Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 10:44 PM
jt-3d's Avatar
jt-3d jt-3d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by annakin View Post
The best evidence I have is the film 9/11 Eyewitness, which was taped across the river from New Jersey. It records audio of 9 widely-spaced booms before the first collapse and a more rapid progression of 4-5 booms for the second one. So, if you want this CT'ers answer, I think there were 9 charges in each building, the first ones were set off one at a time, the second ones were set off in clusters, all in the basement.
Or they could be steel beams snapping as the building is getting ready to fall. Or are you going to just dismiss this possibility?
__________________
You're a coward and a liar and a thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 10:53 PM
annakin annakin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
Default

>Or they could be steel beams snapping as the building is getting ready to fall. Or are you going to just dismiss this possibility?

No, I don't dismiss it. In fact, a lot of witness reports of "explosions" are undifferentiated from the collapse itself. Like I said, this is the hardest aspect of 9/11 CT imho. The rest is fairly easy...
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 10:53 PM
jt-3d's Avatar
jt-3d jt-3d is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,759
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Architect View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpitfireIX View Post
It's fairly clear to me that the position of the strikes was pre-calculated.

It most likely was--by Osama bin Laden, who holds a degree in civil engineering.
I'm going to disagree slightly there. Setting to one side the difference between a civil and a structural engineer, I doubt if he was that specific. He would know that an impact and fire would probably cause a collapse, but wouldn't be tooooo worried about where on the structure. Otherwise he'd have gone for lower down - quicker collapse, less chance of firefighting.
I don't think they were calculated at all. They just aimed for the building. If it was calculated they would have been more similar in location. They may have been given general instructions such as aim for the lowest part or something but I doubt anything specific. Further bin Laden himself said he was surprised that the whole buildings came down. (That of course relies on a translation, since I don't speak arabic or farsi or whatever it was, but I haven't heard anybody claiming the translations were faked, just you know, bin Laden himself.)
__________________
You're a coward and a liar and a thOOF - Bart Sibrel
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 11:08 PM
Architect's Avatar
Architect Architect is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by annakin View Post
>Or they could be steel beams snapping as the building is getting ready to fall. Or are you going to just dismiss this possibility?

No, I don't dismiss it. In fact, a lot of witness reports of "explosions" are undifferentiated from the collapse itself. Like I said, this is the hardest aspect of 9/11 CT imho. The rest is fairly easy...

No problem. Give us links to the quotes and we'll respond.
__________________
Okay, okay, Mr. Contractor...you can have an extension of time under clause 25 but forget the consequent direct loss and expense under clause 26 - I mean, hell, I thought it was obvious that the foundations went under the walls but there you go.....

...now, I need a clause 13A quote for C4 coated rebar, please.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 11:10 PM
annakin annakin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
Default

>(i) Have you seen the computer models of the fire?

No...how do I know they aren't rigged though?

>(ii) What would you expect the fire to look like?

Red. Or orange, or yellow. This building in Spain actually managed to lose a few upper floors:

Image



>(iii) Have you correlated the supposed people

I understand what you are saying but why not just post some photos of the fire?

Last edited by Wolverine; 27-August-2006 at 11:11 PM. Reason: Replaced hotlinked image with URL.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 11:14 PM
Wolverine's Avatar
Wolverine Wolverine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 5,257
Send a message via MSN to Wolverine Send a message via Yahoo to Wolverine
Default

annakin: I've substituted a URL for the image you had placed in your above post. Please be sure to familiarize yourself with our forum rules; we have very specific restrictions on image use due to bandwidth and copyright issues.

Quote:
8. Hotlinking

Try to avoid putting in links to images directly from someone else's website. This can add a lot to their bandwidth, and then the host has to pay for it. In other words, if you see an image you like on an astronomy site, put in a link to that site, but don't use the [IMG] tags so the image loads into your post from their site directly. If you really want an image in your post, put it in a public site someplace and link to it from there. One exception would be from sites like NASA or universities, where bandwidth is not such an issue. If you own the image, then you can upload it to the board yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 11:17 PM
Architect's Avatar
Architect Architect is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 248
Default

i
Quote:
) Have you seen the computer models of the fire?

No...how do I know they aren't rigged though?

How do you know the photos aren't rigged? How do you know that Jones' "evidence" isn't rigged?




Quote:
>(ii) What would you expect the fire to look like?

Red. Or orange, or yellow. This building in Spain actually managed to lose a few upper floors:

To what extent have you considered the depth of the building, positioning of fires therein, and so on?

And why would the external face glow red?
__________________
Okay, okay, Mr. Contractor...you can have an extension of time under clause 25 but forget the consequent direct loss and expense under clause 26 - I mean, hell, I thought it was obvious that the foundations went under the walls but there you go.....

...now, I need a clause 13A quote for C4 coated rebar, please.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2006, 11:35 PM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

Video fakery theories aren't popular even among the CT crowd. But, these theories have never been debunked, only ignored and/or slandered.

Check out here.

I'm using a 911 CT for the simple reason that he debunks that "no planes" "fake video" myths but is obviously still in the "Govt did it" camp. I'd note that this means that a lot of his claims (especially the first parts) need to be looked at more closely (for example this classic line "Examination of the CBS video shows that, ignoring the penthouse, the building collapsed entirely in under 7 seconds. An brick dropped from the height of the building's roof through a vacuum would have taken 5.9 seconds to reach the ground. Clearly, the structure of this building had been shattered to remove nearly all the resistance to its collapse." The fact the penthouse fell into the interior over 5 secs before the collapse shows that the interior structure was shattered and gone, duh! He does get close to reality a few times, but doesn't want to let go of his CT beliefs so often clearly contradicts the photos sitting right next to his statments.)
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 12:05 AM
Sam5 Sam5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
Um, no. Seriously. Nixon hired people to break into a man's psychiatrist's office......
Ahh, the good old days. That guy Ellsberg released classified government documents to the press, against federal law. He, a government employee, fed the confidential documents to the Washington Post. This year, the Pennsylvania ACLU celebrates the anti-government break-in of the FBI office in Media, PA in 1971. This group of lawyers praises the break-in of an FBI office! Lol. Business as usual for the politicos.

They couldn’t break into each other’s offices fast enough back in those days. No buildings blown up by the government, but there were buildings being blown up and people killed by the anti-government opposition, such as ROTC buildings, university buildings, military recruitment centers, etc. PG&E towers were being toppled by the anti-government people in California. Kidnappings, murders, armed robberies, etc., none done by the government. Not to mention the fact that Woodward and Bernstein were getting confidential information from government workers, telling them that their information would be kept confidential, then Woodward turned right around and fed the information to Mark Felt of the FBI! Lol. Remind me to never tell Woodward or Bernstein anything I want to keep secret.

But what does their movie show? Woodward and Bernstein being afraid for their lives as if the big ol’ bad government was going to do away with them like in the movie “Enemy of the State” and “Three Days of the Condor.” Lol. This is what started all this modern “conspiracy” baloney..... Hollywood. Excuse me if I’m not afraid of the government blowing up my office building or chasing me through the streets of New York and Washington.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 12:54 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam5 View Post
Excuse me if I’m not afraid of the government blowing up my office building or chasing me through the streets of New York and Washington.
Neither am I. Neither would I have been under Nixon, frankly. However, had Nixon decided he didn't like me--for whatever reason, apparently--there's not an aspect of my life under the government that would have been safe. They sure would've done their level best to screw up my disability claim, I can tell you that. (An audit of my back taxes wouldn't find anything. I've never made enough to make it worth my while to cheat.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by annakin
No, I don't dismiss it. In fact, a lot of witness reports of "explosions" are undifferentiated from the collapse itself. Like I said, this is the hardest aspect of 9/11 CT imho. The rest is fairly easy...
The part that's easy for you is motive, which again isn't at all what you should look at first. What's proving difficult for you, it seems, is evidence. Perhaps this should tell you something.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 01:18 AM
Sam5 Sam5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,410
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
Neither am I. Neither would I have been under Nixon, frankly. However, had Nixon decided he didn't like me--for whatever reason, apparently--there's not an aspect of my life under the government that would have been safe....
Well, I’ll go along with that regarding those days. But that’s different from a big conspiracy to kill thousands of Americans in plane hijackings and building explosions.

My original point was that the lives of Woodward and Bernstein were NOT in danger, and in fact they were getting information from government people, including a high FBI official, in a political effort to topple Nixon. But the movie made it seem as if the government was “out to get” Woodward and Bernstein, rather than W&B and government people being out to get Nixon.

I’m not trying to justify things that Nixon did. I’m trying to point out that Hollywood can take the truth and twist it around and make a lot of people paranoid.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 01:40 AM
Faultline's Avatar
Faultline Faultline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,200
Default

Looking at motives is useless in a scientific discussion, anyway. Motives are difficult to prove, difficult to disprove, and don't prove anything even if you DO prove one exists.
__________________
My son is my universe.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 01:51 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

I have to agree quite a bit, I think a lot of CT's only really understand the world from Hollywood's perspective. It goes further and deeper that just the obvious movies though. Look at Stargate: SG-1 for an example. Pyramids built by Aliens who controlled Earth and built our civilisation. Secret Covert US military operations. Hiding contact with Aliens, covering up alien attacks, black government ops groups (who then go rouge), secret spaceflight technologies and space program. It's really the entire bundle of CT bollocks. Yet it's in other programs too, and not just The X-Files and Millenium. Follow The Pretender and you'll find dark government sponsered groups conspiring to overthrow governments, cause plane crashes and worse. Roswell continues the Roswell crash myth and adds in the idea of evil Government men trying to hunt them down, as does Taken and The 4400. Even popular non-sci-fi has similar things, watch 24 for example, all of them have included some sort of inside job, and season 5 could have been right out of many of the 911 CT's handbooks.

I do believe, that perhaps while they haven't created the conspiracy theory as such, they do continually promote them in the popular media, and I expressed that in this thread a while back.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 01:54 AM
Sam5 Sam5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,410
Default

Opps, wrong post on the wrong thread.

Last edited by Sam5; 28-August-2006 at 02:07 AM. Reason: wrong thread :)
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 02:19 AM
Woody- Woody- is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by annakin View Post

Red. Or orange, or yellow. This building in Spain actually managed to lose a few upper floors:

Image

The only thing this pic shows is that fire is much more visible at night.
__________________
Reality is for those that can't handle video games.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 06:07 AM
Architect's Avatar
Architect Architect is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
black government ops groups (who then go rouge)
What, like they start wearing make-up?
__________________
Okay, okay, Mr. Contractor...you can have an extension of time under clause 25 but forget the consequent direct loss and expense under clause 26 - I mean, hell, I thought it was obvious that the foundations went under the walls but there you go.....

...now, I need a clause 13A quote for C4 coated rebar, please.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 06:36 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

What, like they start wearing make-up?

No, they go from Black-Ops to Red-Ops..... sheeze do really I have to explain the entire workings of the super secret galatic Government to you?
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 28-August-2006, 10:05 AM
MG1962A's Avatar
MG1962A MG1962A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
I don't think they were calculated at all. They just aimed for the building. If it was calculated they would have been more similar in location. They may have been given general instructions such as aim for the lowest part or something but I doubt anything specific. Further bin Laden himself said he was surprised that the whole buildings came down. (That of course relies on a translation
If reports are correct Bin Laden did give them general instructions on what to do. Two thirds up and try and get a corner. I have a foggy memory he had studied a little about building design.

Given you have inexperienced pilots in high stress, I suppose you could say they almost did pretty good (relatively speaking)

And I have seen the same interview when bin laden was surprised the buildings came down. Like most watching that day, he thought they would loose the top third or so
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)