Ha, ha...the nuts are going to snip this story in some future "nasa's hiding something" documentary. Upon closer inspection, it appeared they might have blown the toilet tanks before re-entry and what we are seeing is probably a frozen turd.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14901858/

In the video, the guy calling Nasa has to tell them he's not joking first, lol. That's the line the woowoo's will snip...

Might be, there's been at least one mission that had a waste line stopped up due to something sticking and freezing.

__________________
The last time I felt a warm fuzzy feeling, I was informed by my doctor that it was just gas.

They're having a lot of fun over at GLP.

__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

LOL! I had fun with this in class today since it was in fact a UFO.

__________________
I am the stone that the builder refused
I am the visual,
the inspiration,
that made lady sing the blues
Judo flip, chop chop chop

Proof of UFO's

[tinfoilhat mode quote]Astronauts and cosmonauts have seen strange objects in orbit for years[/tinfoilhat mode quote]

__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran

Well, not an ufo.

Just another example of the long list of nasa mediocrity.

One future mission we'll hear "SPLAT!!!! AW JEEZ! THANKS ATLANTIS!!!!

__________________
I am the stone that the builder refused
I am the visual,
the inspiration,
that made lady sing the blues
Judo flip, chop chop chop

So are the UFO's holding the shuttle hostage??
Will the space shuttle ever be allowed to come back to Earth??
And what will the UFO's think of the Space Station??



Is this finally the end for all of us???

Sounds like a job for... TP Man!

__________________
Any fool can ask a profound question that takes a wise man decades to answer.

I don't know whats weirder. That GLP had twelve pages of babble on the subject in the space of only a few hours or that Toseek actually monitors that zoo.

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales

He's not the only one!

It's just a hobby.

__________________
What's the youngest you could die of old age?

Well, I'm never gonna get that image outta my head.

How about the constellation Urion?

(ref. Apollo 13, as well as some space ref books)

__________________
This is no fantasy. No careless product of wild imagination. - Jor-El

Godspeed, John Glenn. - Scott Carpenter

And these atomic bombs that science burst upon the world that night were strange even to the men that used them.
- H.G Wells, The World Set Free

To the conspiracy crowd, radiation is a big Boogey Man that inspires terror and death in all who encounter it. - JayUtah

I have not heard of that board before he linked to it. Man, it's....ah.....entertaining at least. I look foward to browsing it as time permits whenever I need a laugh or two.

Some of the more *ahem* colourful (note the correct, Canadian spelling) posters that drop by here are invited to leave this board and head over to that one, where the rules are a bit...laxer than here...(laxer...laxative..coincidence?)

Pete

__________________
PJE

There's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I wish I had read that book by that wheelchair guy.

Or Rothschild Sewage and Septic Sucking Services!

__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.

meaning?

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

Meaning that a multimillon shuttle device delayed its landing because is losing pieces, pieces that even nasa doesnt have a clue of what they are.

Meaning that a multimillon shuttle device delayed its landing

From the sounds of things, it was likely going to be delayed by weather anyway.

because is losing pieces, pieces that even nasa doesnt have a clue of what they are.

It is very unlikely it was part of the shuttle itself, and how exactly are they supposed to identify a dark spot that is on a TV monitor? Magic? Remote Viewing?

__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran

They will ask either Sylvia Browne or Nancy Leider, depends who is on duty.

And so the answer will be:
either a lost soul of a dead astronaut or planet X

Meaning that a multimillon shuttle device delayed its landing because is losing pieces, pieces that even nasa doesnt have a clue of what they are.

First, nobody knows if the object was a piece of the Orbiter. Second, how exactly are you supposed to tell from a brief glimpse of an object as it dwindles in the distance? Third, do you have any idea of what is involved in getting a manned spacecraft into orbit, or in determining whether it is safe to land? If not, how exactly are you competent to judge "mediocrity"? Was there a point to your comment, or are you simply feeling superior today?

__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago."

Jesuscrist, is this serious?

If you have any doubts about nasa mediocrity, here, let me show you the word mediocrity really loud, in its purest form, courtesy of the NASA's chief HIMSELF:

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/shuttle-05zzzzr.html
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...nterview_x.htm


The space shuttle and International Space Station — nearly the whole of the U.S. manned space program for the past three decades — were mistakes, NASA chief Michael Griffin said Tuesday.

Sorry for my english.

Billions of dollars sunk into the Strategic Defense Initiative, and the most effective mode of space combat we can come up with is flinging poo... (and here I thought we stopped flying monkeys in the 50's )

__________________
The last time I felt a warm fuzzy feeling, I was informed by my doctor that it was just gas.

Never underestimate the destructive potential of dung moving at near-relativistic velocities....

__________________
Any fool can ask a profound question that takes a wise man decades to answer.

"captain's log..."

*I am sooo sorry...*

__________________
Any fool can ask a profound question that takes a wise man decades to answer.

rotflmao!

__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith

Please don't be sorry that was the best laugh I've had all day.

If you have any doubts about nasa mediocrity, here, let me show you the word mediocrity really loud, in its purest form, courtesy of the NASA's chief HIMSELF:

So with hindsight they made a mistake, are you perfect? Can you predict everything that your choices 30 years ago would have today? Could have you done a better job? It's easy to cast insults 30 years after the fact, not so easy predicting the future. Yes, in hindsight, the Shuttle was compromised by a lot of factors, but it was a good vision, it just wasn't going to go anywhere. Nixon liked it though and killed Apollo. Had they expanded from Apollo we'd have been on Mars over a decade ago, probably have a full time present there with people trather then robots, but that wasn't the direction Congress took. Don't be so fast to blame NASA either. They do what they can with the tools they were given. They got given shoody tools that were only any good for NEO and haven't lived up to their original billing. Easy to look back and see that, not so easy to do in 1970. However having said that there is no reason to believe that the object fell off the shuttle. NASA is still jumpy after Columbia and so is willing to take greater precautions to make sure everything is okay if if the odds of it not are 0.001%. They just won't take any risks right now, and fair enough. It's not like the crew or ship are in any danger by delaying them, so why not do it and be safe and 100% sure it's fine?

__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran