|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I noticed this on Digg yesterday: Scientific Poll: 84% Reject Official 9/11 Story. (Yes. Captain Conspiracy himself...)
Really, I don't have too much to say about it, because this comment to the Digg submission pretty much says it all: Quote:
|
|
||||
|
And what they are hiding is:
That they had reservations that a major terrorist attack might be in the works or that they could have foreseen a major terrorist attack had they pushed to see all of the reports from field agents.
__________________
Keeper of the Jabberwock |
|
||||
|
That and that their response systems were flawed for an internal attack, that people made bad calls which resulted in unnecessary deaths, that the fire crews were under equipped and unprepared for the event, that the administation spent the critical parts of the morning looking like stunned goats and as a whole the White House, the FAA and NORAD have been spinning things to cover their collective butts so that the whole pile of mess doesn't get dumped into their laps for being incompetent. Having said that, with the systems they had, they did a reasonable job, it's just the the communications and systems they had in place sucked very badly.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername Apollo: The History and the Hoax Enter the World of Athran |