14-November-2006, 09:42 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
|
|
Hoax Claims needed!!!
Below is a summary of what I'm going to be working through slowly. I have tried to line up the Hoax Claims into sections where they have something to do with the section being discused. Unfortunately I'm a little light in some sections (though I expect that some sections will other non-Apollo sections will have no Hoax claim attached) and I was hoping that people might know of hoax claims I haven't got but need so that I can use them to fill the pages that are really needing a few more. Mostly I'm looking for things that can be added to Apollo's 7, 8 & 10. Any help appreciated.
==================================================
Apollo 1 Page:- Summary
- The Apollo 1 astronauts were killed because Grissom was going to “blow the whistle” on the fakery
- Gus Grissom was obviously trying to make a big statement as he placed a lemon in the window of the Apollo I spacecraft as it sat ready for launch!
- The Apollo 1 fire of January 27, 1967, killed what would have been the first crew to walk on the Moon just days after the commander, Gus Grissom, held an unapproved press conference complaining that they were at least ten years, not two, from reaching the Moon. The dead man's own son, who is a seasoned pilot himself, has in his possession forensic evidence personally retrieved from the charred spacecraft (that the government has tried to destroy on two or more occasions).
Apollo 4 Page:- Mission Summary.
- CSM Profile and structure of CSM
- The Apollo spacecraft would have needed 6 feet of lead shielding to protect the astronauts.
- CNN issued the following report, "The radiation belts surrounding Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed (like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach the Moon.) The phenomenon known as the 'Van Allen Belts' can spawn (newly discovered) 'Killer Electrons' that can dramatically affect the astronauts' health."
- An astrophysicist who has worked for NASA writes that it takes two meters of shielding to protect against medium solar flares and that heavy ones give out tens of thousands of rem in a few hours.
- Russian scientists calculated in 1959 that astronauts needed a shield of 4 feet of lead to protect them on the Moons surface.
- Why didn't the astronauts on Apollo 14 and 16 die after exposure to this immense amount of radiation?
- Why are NASA only starting a project now to test the lunar radiation levels and what their effects would be on the human body if they have sent 12 men there already?
Apollo 5 Page:- Mission Summary
- The LM was never tested unmanned
- The Apollo spacecraft would have needed 6 feet of lead shielding to protect the astronauts.
- LM Structure and design
- The LM couldn't have flown
- The LM doesn't look like a spacecraft
- The LM was too flimsy
Apollo 6 Page:- Mission Summary
- Saturn V structure and design
- The technology didn’t exist to go to the Moon.
- The Apollo computers weren’t powerful enough. In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple calculator.
Apollo 7 Page:- Mission Summary
- All the Astronauts were Military so they would have done what they were ordered too.
- Apollo 7 was just a few months after Apollo 6, which had major problems with the Saturn V. They couldn't have fixed it in time.
Apollo 8 Page:- Mission Summary
- The CSM was just in LEO
Apollo 9: Completed
Apollo 10 Page:- Mission Summary
- The LM was never tested Manned near the moon
- Who would dare risk using the LM on the Moon when a simulated Moon landing was never tested?
Apollo 11 Page:- Mission Summary
- The LM was never test landed MANNED either
- Some photographs have a person / object in shadow but they are lit, proving that addition lighting was used.
- Who filmed Neil Armstrong coming down the ladder?
- There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the LM's 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Sceptics would have you believe that the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LM as it landed. If this is true, how did Armstrong create that famous boot print if all the dust had been blown away?
- Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand. The astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place.
- Armstrong refuses to be interviewed about the landings.
- How could they get it right the first time?
- The astronauts should have been able to jump six feet straight up.
- Instead of being able to jump at least ten feet high in "one sixth" gravity, the highest jump was about nineteen inches.
- Film evidence has recently been uncovered of a mis-labelled, unedited, behind-the-scenes video film, showing the crew of Apollo 11 staging part of their photography. The film evidence is shown in the video "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!". and appears above in the 'Why Did Apollo 11 Astronauts Lie About Being In Deep Space?' section.
Apollo 12 Page:- Mission Summary
- All the lunar photographs are too good; they all look professionally done.
- The film would have melted in the heat or been exposed by radiation
- There were no viewfinders on the camera.
- The pure oxygen atmosphere in the module would have melted the Hasselblad's camera covering and produced poisonous gases. Why weren't the astronauts affected?
- The Apollo 11 TV pictures were lousy, yet the broadcast quality magically became fine on the five subsequent missions.
- Why did so many NASA Moonscape photos have non parallel shadows? sceptics will tell you because there is two sources of light on the Moon - the Sun and the Earth... That maybe the case, but the shadows would still fall in the same direction, not two or three different angles and Earth shine would have no effect during the bright lunar day (the time at which the Apollo was on the Moon).
Apollo 13 Page: Completed
Apollo 14 Page:- Mission Summary
- You can see the flag waving on the Moon, showing it is being blown by a breeze. During the Apollo 14 flag setup ceremony, the flag would not stop fluttering.
- The film was slowed down to make it appear as 1/6 gravity.
- Heiligenschein Halos/Spotlights
- Spotlights in the Helmets
Apollo 15 Page:- Mission Summary
- The astronauts could not have operated the camera or wound the film with gloves on.
- The crosshairs in some of the photographs disappear behind objects, proving the photos were faked.
- Why did one of the stage prop rocks have a capital "C" on it and a 'C' on the ground in front of it?
- The LRV couldn't fit into the LM
- If the Rover buggy had actually been moving in one-sixth gravity, then it would have required a twenty-foot width in order not to have flipped over on nearly every turn. The Rover had the same width as ordinary small cars.
Apollo 16 Page:- Mission Summary
- The astronauts couldn’t survive the + / - 280F temperatures on the Moon.
- Sceptics argue that the lack of stars on Moon photographs is acceptable, despite zero atmosphere to obscure the view. Yuri Gagarin pronounced the stars to be "astonishingly brilliant". See the official NASA pictures above that I have reproduced that show 'stars' in the sky, as viewed from the lunar surface. And why exactly do you think there are hardly any stars visible on Apollo films taken from the Moon? The answers simple - Professional astronomers would quickly calculate that the configuration and distances of star formations were incorrect and so NASA had to remove them to make sure they could keep up the scam.
- It could have been filmed in a studio (House Rock Defence.)
- Missing Rover Tracks
- Same backgrounds different times
- Even though slow motion photography was able to give a fairly convincing appearance of very low gravity, it could not disguise the fact that the astronauts travelled no further between steps than they would have on Earth
Apollo 17 Page:- Mission Summary
- The backgrounds in some photos aren't right, the LM changes size but the mountains don’t.
- This proves the LM was moved around a movie set as required for good shots. They also have the same background for different locations.
- Why in most Apollo photos, is there a clear line of definition between the rough foreground and the smooth background?
- Who took the photographs of the LM lifting off the Moon? With more than a two second signal transmission round trip, how did a camera pan upward to track the departure of the Apollo 16 LEM? Gus Grissom, before he got burned alive in the Apollo I disaster A few minutes before he was burned to death in the Apollo I tragedy, Gus Grissom said, 'Hey, you guys in the control center, get with it. You expect me to go to the moon and you can't even maintain telephonic communications over three miles.' This statement says a lot about what Grissom thought about NASA's progress in the great space race.
- Sceptics claim that you cannot produce a flame in a vacuum because of the lack of oxygen. So how come I have footage on this page showing a flame coming from the exhaust of an Apollo lander? (Obviously the sceptics are wrong or the footage shows the lander working in an atmosphere)
|
Linear Mode
