Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 12:07 PM
jay1976 jay1976 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Bull...you continue to post that "we" haven't investigated Roswell simply because we do not agree with your "conclusions". I would have no "complaint" with you, if only you would stop saying that...understand??
I think i have only said that to you, and thats understandable. If you dont agree with my conclusions, i dont care, i dont insult people about it. Please quote me on the things i have said?
  #92 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 12:08 PM
jay1976 jay1976 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
All I really "want to do" is compel you to provide evidence that there actually was a "conspiracy". Why don't you channel your energies into proving that??
I would if u would just put a sock in it!
  #93 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 12:27 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,541
Default

So "if only" you didn't have to respond to feedback from me, then you would be able to proceed with the presentation of your evidence??

That doesn't make a lot of sense, but sure, be my guest...proceed...
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
  #94 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 12:33 PM
Tinaa Tinaa is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 3,799
Default

Both of you need to chill. The report button is to be used when someone breaks a rule, not because you are irritated with each other. This is not a warning, just stop the bickering.
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 04:00 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay1976 View Post
In my opinion, militery
The Roswell incident couldn't have been a military project because the military was unaware of any crash until notified by a civilian. Flight test of secret aircraft were carried out in California at Muroc AFB, now known as Edwards AFB, which incidently, had its own UFO encounters just days after the Roswell incident. Here is the report.

http://www.nuforc.org/Muroc.html
  #96 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 04:36 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=eburacum45;885926]David Rudiak did try to show that the balloon involved, Flight #4, was unlikely to have arrived at the landing spot;
I use to think that a Mogul balloon train was launched at one time but I became suspicious of any launch because no one mentioned recovering anything associated with a Mogul balloon train on the Foster ranch, so I did further research and found that Mogul balloon train #4 was never launched in the first place and the reason was due to clouds. Here is a typical equipment list of a Mogul balloon train yet none of the following equipment was ever recovered on that ranch.

Mogul Balloon Train Equipment

* Dribblers

* Ballast tubes

* Braided lines

* 28 balloons of various sizes

* Radiosode

* 17.5 payload

* Parachutes

* Equipment gauges

The June 3, 1947 launch of a Mogul balloon train was also cancelled due to clouds in the area. The next Mogul balloon flight didn't take place until June 5 and that balloon flight is listed in Mogul balloon flight records as balloon flight #5. That is why there are no flight records for Mogul balloon train #4, because it was never flown.

Mogul balloons were not classified objects and that was no way they could have been confused as downed 'flying saucers.' The balloon train in this photo, which incidently, was recovered by civilians, doesn't resemble a downed 'flying saucer' yet no saucer cover-up story by the military for this recovery.

http://roswellproof.homestead.com/Tr...es_7-14-47.jpg

I also found that Mogul balloon trains were recovered by civilians on other occasions as well. One Mogul balloon train was vandalized because no one was sent to recover the contraption eventhough it was left lying next to a roadway. Mogul balloon trains also had reward tags, equipment ID tags, ID tags identifying the equipment as government property, and questionaires for anyone who recovers a downed Mogul balloon train so there was no way they could have confused them as an ET craft from outer space. The questionaires that were attached to Mogul balloon trains requested the discovered to add their input as to how fast the Mogul balloon train decended, the time and location the downed balloon was found. In other words, ordinary civilians without secret clearances were invited to add information regarding their discovery of any downed Mogul balloon train.

Another Mogul balloon was recovered by a policeman in Flat Bush, New Jersey after ther balloon snagged itself on the roof of a tavern. Another Mogul balloon train was recovered by Rancher, Sid West, in New Mexico and it wasn't until the next day that two individuals were sent to recover the Mogul balloons. Mogul balloon recoveries were not of high priority and the reason why they were often left lying in open fields.

So, thanks to the Air Force, which supplied some of that information, no Project Mogul balloon train was involved in the Roswell incident.
  #97 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 04:51 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Spock;886441]Well yes, actually, because Roswell happened so long ago any information would have been declassified under the fifty year rule. But the government came back and said there was no iinformation on record to declassify! So the government can't have it both ways. Either they neeeded to cover up something secret or there was nothing secret to cover up in the first place. One or the other bu not both. The American public are entirely stupid.
According to the GAO, permanent records relating to the Roswell incident at Roswell AAF were destroyed.

As far as who initiated the Roswell cover-up? It wasn't the folks in Texas nor at Roswell AAF, but from Washington D.C.

-------------------------------------------------------------

WAR V WU A50 NL PD

KALAMAZOO MICH JUL 8

WAR DEPT

INTELLIGENCE DIV WASHDC

SUGGEST SAUCERS ARE RADAR TARGET FOR WEATHER OBSERVATION

PURPOSES CONTACT COL M DUFFY SPRING LAKE NEW JERSEY FOR

INFORMATION

TONY GASTON NEWS EDITOR WKZO

1015P

WKZO.
  #98 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 05:14 PM
jay1976 jay1976 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 32
Default

keep the information coming sky
  #99 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 05:47 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jay1976 View Post
keep the information coming sky
I have some information on Project Mogul proving that Project Mogul balloon train #4, which the Air Force implied was responsible for the Roswell incident, never was flown and the Air Force knew it. In other words, that balloon train could not have been responsible for the Roswell incident by that very fact.

For a while, I thought that Mogul balloon train was launched at one time but I became suspicious as to why there were no flight records for Mogul balloon train #4 so I did further investigating and now, I found out why thanks to the U.S. Air Force.

I am waiting for approval to have the information posted.
  #100 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 05:50 PM
Kesh's Avatar
Kesh Kesh is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 1,134
Send a message via ICQ to Kesh Send a message via Yahoo to Kesh
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
According to the GAO, permanent records relating to the Roswell incident at Roswell AAF were destroyed.

As far as who initiated the Roswell cover-up? It wasn't the folks in Texas nor at Roswell AAF, but from Washington D.C.
Do you have evidence to back this up?

Quote:
-------------------------------------------------------------

WAR V WU A50 NL PD

KALAMAZOO MICH JUL 8

WAR DEPT

INTELLIGENCE DIV WASHDC

SUGGEST SAUCERS ARE RADAR TARGET FOR WEATHER OBSERVATION

PURPOSES CONTACT COL M DUFFY SPRING LAKE NEW JERSEY FOR

INFORMATION

TONY GASTON NEWS EDITOR WKZO

1015P

WKZO.
This is meaningless, since we have no idea where you got this from. This is why citations are important.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Philip K. Dick, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes."
Mark Twain

Avatar courtesy of Bunny.
  #101 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 06:05 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Kesh;887082]Do you have evidence to back this up?
This is meaningless, since we have no idea where you got this from. This is why citations are important.
It is important because it shows that there was in fact, a government cover-up relating to the Roswell incident. That document also confirms the testimony of Jesse Marcel and Thomas Dubose, both who posed with the Roswell debris in the famous photos. Here's the document.

http://project1947.com/roswell/wkzo.gif

Last edited by skyeagle409; 18-December-2006 at 06:08 PM.. Reason: Additional Information
  #102 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 06:12 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
It is important because it shows that there was in fact, a government cover-up relating to the Roswell incident.
Yes, but what exactly was the government covering up??
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
  #103 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 06:17 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Spock;885439]Well what a surprise! The military denies it was them! Well you learn something new everyday dontcha?

1993 affidavit signed by Haut

AFFIDAVIT

My name is Walter Haut.

My address is: [-------BLACKED OUT-------]

I am retired.

In July 1947, I was stationed at the Roswell Army Air base, serving as the base Public Information Officer. At approximately 9:30 AM on July 8, I received a call from Col. William Blanchard, the base commander, who said he had in his possession a flying saucer or parts thereof. He said it came from a ranch northwest of Roswell, and that the base Intelligence Officer, Major Jesse Marcel, was going to fly the material to Fort Worth.

Col. Blanchard told me to write a news release about the operation and to deliver it to both newspapers and the two radio stations in Roswell. He felt that he wanted the local media to have the first opportunity to have the story. I went first to KGFL, then to KSWS, then to the *Daily Record* and finally to the *Morning Dispatch*.

The next day, I read in the newspaper that General Roger Ramey in Fort Worth has said the object was a weather balloon. I believe Col. Blanchard saw the material, because he sounded positive about what the material was. There is no chance that he would have mistaken it for a weather balloon. Neither is there any chance that Major Marcel would have been mistaken.

In 1980, Jesse Marcel told me that the material photographed in Gen. Ramey's office was not the material he had recovered.

I am convinced that the material recovered was some type of craft from outer space.

I have not been paid nor given anything of value to make this statement, and it is the truth to the best of my recollection.

/s/ Walter G. Haut
Signature witnessed by: 5-14-93 Max Littell. /s/ (Date)
  #104 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 06:20 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyeagle409 View Post
I am convinced that the material recovered was some type of craft from outer space.
That's nice. Walter is convinced.

Unfortunately we can't simply take Walter's "word" for it.

We require evidence....got some??
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
  #105 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 06:56 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=R.A.F.;887102]That's nice. Walter is convinced.

Unfortunately we can't simply take Walter's "word" for it.

We require evidence....got some??
We have evidence that the object that crashed at Roswell is not what the Air Force said it was.
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 07:02 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=R.A.F.;887094]Yes, but what exactly was the government covering up??
I am going with the remains of a 'flying saucer.'

Not many people are aware that Project Mogul and Skyhook balloon teams were reporting 'flying saucers' over New Mexico as well. In fact, Charles Moore, the person who has been trying to debunk the Roswell incident as one of his Mogul balloon trains, recorded his own UFO sighting, which was published in LIFE Magazine in 1952 and is listed as "Incident 3.

"Moore's sighting is also found in a number of government documents, including those of the CIA, whose scientists were very impressed by it."

http://roswellproof.homestead.com/LIFE_1952.html


And, there is this.


"Naval Commander Robert B. McLaughlin, head of the Naval missile program at White Sands (who unequivocally stated that the flying saucers being spotted by White Sands personnel, including himself, were not only real but extraterrestrial in origin).

http://roswellproof.homestead.com/files/MCLAUGH1.jpg
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 07:24 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Sam5;885887]That's not true. Science minded people are usually the first to examine any reports of strange things, such as big foot, flying saucers from other planets, perpetual motion machines, etc. Everybody wants the Nobel Prize for finding something really new in nature. But every time we examine the UFO stories, we never find any evidence that they are things from other worlds.
J. Allen Hynek was an hardcore UFO skepitc, that is, until he became involved into the investigation of the UFO enigma. Afterwards, he wasn't skeptical anymore!

Quote:
Some UFOs I managed to photograph with a long telephoto lens turned out to be plastic shopping bags sucked up into the air from a Wal-Mart parking lot by the local wind. If I found some solid evidence of a flying saucer from another planet, why would I want to keep it a secret?
I don't rely just on visual accounts alone, but on visual accounts that can be corroborated by other means such as data evidence from radar and ELINT systems.
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 07:25 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Clear Lake City, TX
Posts: 4,488
Default

Skyeagle409, one thing we like on these fora is for sources to be linked or at least listed. Your "affidavit" from Haut carries neither.

Also, there is a BAUT policy about not posting copyrighted material, which this may be. Try posting a tease and a link instead.
__________________
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
Isaac Asimov
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 07:32 PM
SolusLupus's Avatar
SolusLupus SolusLupus is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 5,055
Send a message via AIM to SolusLupus
Default

Well, you know what time it is for.

Z-Com! For UFO defensiveness!

(Sorry, had to comment. Going back to lurker mode now.)
__________________
There are few left who
Stare at the skies with wonder
Wishing to know more;
The clouds still drift by above
But the eyes below are blind.

--Laura Lundberg

Check out my writing, maybe.
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 07:39 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Jim;887149]Skyeagle409, one thing we like on these fora is for sources to be linked or at least listed. Your "affidavit" from Haut carries neither.
I should mention that Lt. Haut also made the same comments on TV to where there was no question as to what he was saying.

In regards to UFOs, a lot of my references can be obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and microfilm from libraries but I rely much on my own knowledge as to what the data evidence reveals. Here's a link and I will post links from now on.

http://www.nicap.dabsol.co.uk/true-mc.htm
  #111 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 08:29 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,737
Default

Well, here is a pretty indepth investigation into Roswell...
http://www.roswellfiles.com/index.htm



Quote:
What really did happen back in 1947? The best evidence available is always the data collected soonest after the occurance. All indications from this Best Evidence- Mac Brazel's interview with the Roswell Daily Record; J.B. Johnson's photographs; Press reports from early July, 1947... all point to a simple case of mistaken identity. Papers obtained through the Freedom of Information Act that date from this time period are consistent with the explanation that a Mogul Balloon with a radar reflector was what Mac Brazel found.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
  #112 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 09:07 PM
Grand_Lunar's Avatar
Grand_Lunar Grand_Lunar is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Earth-Moon system
Posts: 2,282
Default

I sort of had hoped that the "alien crash" theorists were out of here.

What happened to rational thinking?

Interesting stuff, gzhpcu. I'm actually surprised the ballon theory holds up. I always figured it was a crash, but a secret aircraft.
__________________
This is no fantasy. No careless product of wild imagination. - Jor-El

Godspeed, John Glenn. - Scott Carpenter

And these atomic bombs that science burst upon the world that night were strange even to the men that used them.
- H.G Wells, The World Set Free

To the conspiracy crowd, radiation is a big Boogey Man that inspires terror and death in all who encounter it. - JayUtah
  #113 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 09:26 PM
SolusLupus's Avatar
SolusLupus SolusLupus is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 5,055
Send a message via AIM to SolusLupus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grand_Lunar View Post
I sort of had hoped that the "alien crash" theorists were out of here.

What happened to rational thinking?
C'mon Grand Lunar, surely we can accomplish this without attacks.

(And yes, I suppose I'm not one to be talking, but point out when I'm making attacks when you can and we're all happy)
__________________
There are few left who
Stare at the skies with wonder
Wishing to know more;
The clouds still drift by above
But the eyes below are blind.

--Laura Lundberg

Check out my writing, maybe.
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 09:44 PM
vonmazur's Avatar
vonmazur vonmazur is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 651
Question Why "Alien" ???

I wonder of some of the advocates of this being an extraordinary occurance, could explain one thing that "sticks" in my mind, so to speak....

Why does this event, of necessity, have to involve "Aliens"???
Why not something less unlikely??

One other point, the quote from the White Sands Officer above means absolutely nothing, without some kind of evidence, and even the language used leads one to wonder about what kind of rational process was going on at the time.....Why use the term "Flying Saucers", when "Anomolous Objects", or Unidentified Objects would have been more logical and a lot less assumptive......IF some object or light is seen, why do we go right off and call it something it is not, without evidence???

Dale in Ala
__________________
"Ad astra per aspera"
  #115 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 09:52 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=gzhpcu;887208]Well, here is a pretty indepth investigation into Roswell...
http://www.roswellfiles.com/index.htm
The materials found were not consistent with any Mogul balloon train. I listed the items carried by Mogul balloon trains and not one single piece was ever recovered on the Foster ranch. Also, I found that the Mogul balloon train the Air Force implied was responsible for the Roswell incident had never flown and the Air Force knew it.

That is why there are no flight records for Mogul balloon train #4.
  #116 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 10:15 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=Grand_Lunar;887243]I sort of had hoped that the "alien crash" theorists were out of here.

Interesting stuff, gzhpcu. I'm actually surprised the ballon theory holds up. I always figured it was a crash, but a secret aircraft.
It wasn't a secret aircraft that crashed at Roswell. Since the military was totally unaware of any crash until notified by the sheriff, the object couldn't have been any type of secret aircraft, especially since days went by and the military was still unaware of any crash on the Foster ranch.

Recently, I went into details on another message board as to how the military keeps its secrets, and I covered how the military keeps secrets even from the eyes of those who already possess Top Secret clearances on certain so-called secret bases.

To sum it up, if you are attached to a secret base and you do not have the need to know nor clearance for certain classified projects, even your Top Secret clearance won't allow you to see what is going on behind closed doors on that secret base.
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 10:36 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=vonmazur;887264]I wonder of some of the advocates of this being an extraordinary occurance, could explain one thing that "sticks" in my mind, so to speak....

Why does this event, of necessity, have to involve "Aliens"???
Why not something less unlikely??

One other point, the quote from the White Sands Officer above means absolutely nothing, without some kind of evidence, and even the language used leads one to wonder about what kind of rational process was going on at the time.....Why use the term "Flying Saucers", when "Anomolous Objects", or Unidentified Objects would have been more logical and a lot less assumptive......IF some object or light is seen, why do we go right off and call it something it is not, without evidence???

Dale in Ala
Because, even the Project Mogul and Skyhook balloon teams were reporting 'flying saucers' over their area in New Mexico.

It couldn't have a secret aircraft because the military was not aware of any downed classified project of theirs at the time of the crash on the Foster ranch and it definitely wasn't a Mogul balloon train either. The balloon trains were no more classified than a typical weather balloon, so all I can say is that the Air Force did a brilliant job of pulling another false story over the eyes of the public.

To this very day, the military continues to cover-up the Roswell incident. Even Congressman Steven Schiff (R.,N.M.) was amazed of how the Air Force blocked his attempts to investigate the Roswell incident for himself. You can read his comments here on page 52 of 194.

http://www.gl.iit.edu/wadc/history/r...eport/Book.pdf
  #118 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 10:56 PM
skyeagle409 skyeagle409 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California
Posts: 335
Default

Quote:
=gzhpcu;887208]Well, here is a pretty indepth investigation into Roswell...
http://www.roswellfiles.com/index.htm
I wanted to add that one must be careful of those skeptical websites because they are known for providing bad information.

For an example, I was debating on another website where a Roswell debunker tried to discredit one of the Roswell military witnesses. It involved Kirtland AFB and the ability of the Air Force's C-54 to operate from that base. The debunker claimed the runway at Kirtland AFB was too short for the C-54 to operate from and that raised my eyebrows above my hairline. I later found that his reference came from the website of Tim Printy and that is what set the fireworks off.

I was already aware that the C-54 operated from time to time out of Kirtland, but apparently, the debunker stood his ground. As a result, I had to throw in some military history to back my claim that the C-54 was not only capable of flying out of kirtland AFB, but the larger, much heavier B-29 was capable as well. After all, the first atomic bomb components were flown from Kirtland AFB aboard Air Force C-54s and B-29s.

Afterwards, he took the information I supplied and asked Tim Printy for clarification since it was his website that claimed the C-54 was not capable of flying out of Kirtland.

You can read his correction on his own website. Read on down until you come to the red type.

http://members.aol.com/TPrinty/crews.html
  #119 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 10:56 PM
stutefish stutefish is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,114
Default

In the case of a classified aerospace research project, I would not be surprised at all if the public-facing side of the Air Force really did not know about the crash.

I mean, how often does the military register its top-secret programs with its PR department? It's usually best if the public face can disavow knowledge with total sincerity.

I can see it now...

AIR FORCE PR OFFICE: Hello?

BLACK BOX BRIGADE: Yes, this is Joe, over at Area 51. We're testing a new airframe, top secret stuff. In fact, you're not even cleared to know about it.

AF PR: Okay... And how can we help you today?

BBB: Well, if anybody calls saying they saw a crash or picked up some debris from a crash site-

AF PR: Of course! We should say that we know nothing, right? No plane, no test flight, no crash, no nothing, as far as we're concerned, right?

BBB: Actually, we'd like you to politely explain that there was a test flight of a top secret aircraft, and that it crashed, and that's probably what the pieces are. Otherwise, people will start to think we're hiding alien spaceships.

AF PR: Are you sure the official Air Force line isn't "we have no idea what you're talking about", and let the public think whatever it wants?

BBB: No, that won't be necessary. Just remember: this project is classified, and this conversation never happened.

AF PR: I... understand.
  #120 (permalink)  
Old 18-December-2006, 10:59 PM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,663
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

The materials found were not consistent with any Mogul balloon train.

Well if you take the original witness descriptions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac Brazel
]Brazel related that on June 14 he and 8-year-old son, Vernon were about 7 or 8 miles from the ranch house of the J.B. Foster ranch, which he operates, when they came upon a large area of bright wreckage made up on rubber strips, tinfoil, a rather tough paper and sticks.
.....
When the debris was gathered up the tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks made a bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8 inches thick, while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20 inches long and about 8 inches thick. In all, he estimated, the entire lot would have weighed maybe five pounds.

There was no sign of any metal in the area which might have been used for an engine and no sign of any propellers of any kind, although at least one paper fin had been glued onto some of the tinfoil.

There were no words to be found anywhere on the instrument, although there were letters on some of the parts. Considerable scotch tape and some tape with flowers printed upon it had been used in the construction.

No strings or wire were to be found but there were some eyelets in the paper to indicate that some sort of attachment may have been used.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bessie Brazel
The debris looked like pieces of a large balloon which had burst. The pieces were small, the largest I remember measuring about the same as the diameter of a basketball. Most of it was a kind of double-sided material, foil-like on one side and rubber-like on the other... Sticks, like kite sticks, were attacked to some of the pieces with a whitish tape. The tape was about two or three inches wide and had flower-like designs on it. The 'flowers' were faint, a variety of pastel colors... The foil-rubber material could not be torn like ordinary aluminum foil... I do not recall anything else about the stength or other properties of what we picked up. We spent several hours collecting the debris and putting it into sacks. I believe we filled about three sacks... We speculated a bit about what the material could be. I remember dad saying 'Oh, it's just a bunch of garbage.'
Sounds balloon like to me.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roswell Debunking NEOWatcher Off-Topic Babbling 0 01-July-2005 01:17 PM
Rational Roswell? electromagneticpulse Against the Mainstream 27 13-March-2005 05:59 AM
NM Governor Richardson Calls For Roswell UFO Investigation 01101001 Against the Mainstream 57 20-August-2004 03:38 PM
Roswell & Balloons Alan Against the Mainstream 11 13-June-2003 04:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today