|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
In reading the proclamation on national television, Ford inadvertently said 'July 20'.
In addition to his embarrassing falls (due to an inner-ear problem, IIRC), Ford also had a tendency to put his foot in his mouth at times. From an AP article: Quote:
![]()
__________________
--Doug "When your statics problem becomes a dynamics problem, you're in trouble." --me Moor's Law: "As you go from freshman engineering to Ph.D., the amount of work required per credit hour doubles approximately every 18 months." --me, inspired by Prof. Scott Moor |
|
||||
|
So that's what Bush is up too, he's trying to out Ford, Ford. lol
__________________
Howling from the Shadows It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername Apollo: The History and the Hoax Enter the World of Athran |
|
|||
|
The redesigned command module hadn't been tested.
Define 'tested'. Someone has to make the first flight, and Apollo 7 had already flown the block II command module (albeit with block I couches). Nobody had flown on the Saturn V. See above. Someone has to be first, and the escape system was well tested and considered reliable. The control center and network wasn't ready. The fly control team wasn't ready and the crew only had three maybe four months to train versus the normal 1 year. They had already been training for a flight of some kind. Operating the command module wasn't so problemmatic as you make it sound. And tracking and communication with a spacecraft on the way to the Moonis easier because it doesn't keep drifting in and out of recpetion ranges. And they had to reenter at 25000 m/hr. The fastest reentry up to that date. Apollo 4 had already proven the heat shield at translunar re-entry velocity. If there was an Apollo hoax maybe it started around this time period. 1967-1974. But why? What would have to be wrong for the program to need to be faked. The hardware had been designed and built over several years, and it would do the job. What could stop the real landing at such a late stage?
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even reporters have a hard time getting their facts straight while ducking and covering. ![]()
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bart Sibrel's article | AstroMike | Conspiracy Theories | 69 | 14-October-2009 01:56 PM |
| Apollo Astronauts - Joking Around | Kiwi | Space Exploration | 62 | 12-July-2007 10:17 AM |
| What Apollo treasures do you have? | Kiwi | Space Exploration | 43 | 26-March-2007 06:37 PM |
| Check out the Apollo Image Archive by Paul Spurdis (LPI) | Fly Me To The Moon | Conspiracy Theories | 45 | 06-March-2004 06:01 PM |
| A laugh and a half | mbjvx | Conspiracy Theories | 42 | 21-November-2003 07:23 PM |