The greatest illuminati "science" hoax ever - revealed worldwide first by Matt Marriott

Not just another "science" hoax.
You can measure how great the hoax is. The measurement results prove it to be the greatest hoax ever.

No, not Evolution Theory, the most important hoax ever.
It is even older.

No, not Heliocentrism, the mother of all "science" hoaxes.
It is not as old.

Unlike Heliocentrism and Evolution, this hoax did not appear as the result of a new theory.
The acceptance of this hoax was
- the post-condition for the acceptance of the Heliocentric model;
- the pre-condition for the illuminati to launch the Evolution hoax.

The greatest hoax ever and the 9/11 planes hoax

It appeared just like the 9/11 "planes" hoax, i.e. as the result of manufactured "evidence".
Again like 9/11, the repetition technique in the context of the BIG LIE framework (9/11: using not only one but four "jets" to cover-up the hoax; second "impact" constantly repeated in the first hours) was used.
Like 9/11, the full story of this hoax is revealed first worldwide by Matt Marriott.

But what is probably the most incredible analogy with 9/11 is the "thousands of eyewitnesses" aspect, where 9/11 pales in comparison with this hoax ...

To get the hoax's name, just fill the blanks below:

[_ _ _ _ _ _ _] [_ _ _ _ _ _ax]

It should not be difficult to name it, right?

I would vote for the [MattMariot] [bull-hoax]

__________________

Any comments in glorious red are to be considered in ModeratorMode.


善數, 不用籌策 (shàn shù, bù yòng chóu cè)
He who is good at counting, uses no counting tools
“A good scientist has freed himself of concepts and keeps his mind open to what is”
道德經, 二十七 (dào dé jīng, 27)

Do I spin first or can I buy a vowel?

Are there any "T"'s Vanna?

__________________
Spock Jenkins of the Vulcan Jenkins'.

MattMarriott,
Don't play games, I'm not in a guessing mood. Tell us what this is about or I'll suggest the thread be closed. And if has nothing to do with space or astronomy, it is no longer appropriate for this forum.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

More than just related. It is at the center of astronomy and space.

Stellar parallax?

__________________
"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head" Terry Pratchett

I think that the hoax has something to do with the Illuminati's propensity to do bizarre, meaningless to get people to jump through hoops for their amusment.

Hey, wait a minute...

__________________
Carl Matherly

Offical Battlestar Galactica Apologist

Named Time Magazine's 2006 "Person of the Year"

Yes.

This "game" has gone on long enough...specifically spell out what you are talking about.

__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

For once, for me, the Similar Threads feature may have nailed one:
Matt Marriott Thread

That Matt Mariott?

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Looking at his "blog" (what kind of a blog doesn't allow comments??) it would seem that whatever he is talking about has something to do with 911.

And as such would not be appropriate for this forum.

Unless the illuminati are somehow "responsible" for stellar parallax???

__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

Ohhhh k, so what's the hoax? Stellar paralax doesn't exist? What's your evidence?

theres a guy that posts on Talk origins, John McCoy. He thinks Staller Parallax can't be measured because the stars are so far away that the engle will be too small to measure so scientists are just guessing about most of Astronomy to support Evolution.

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

Has he the equipment to actually attempt parallax measurements or is he just making up facts to support his opinion?

__________________
"The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head" Terry Pratchett

He's mostly right, there. Most of the stars in the sky are too far away for parallax to be measured. But there are plenty of nearby stars for which parallax can, and has been, measured.

Parallax is useful only out to a certain distance; after that, you have to use different methods.
He's completely wrong there.

Fred

__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684

I think I got it.

The stellar parallax is so small that one time a person tried to focus his vision on a star. The stress on the nerves was so high from looking at an object requiring a so small difference of angle on the eyes that the brain of that person exploded, sending giblets of brain and shrapnel from his Illuminati's implants. That new zombie then went for a career in politics, confirming the politics-illuminati connection.

Due to radiation from the illuminati implants, the brain giblets that were now set free started to have a life on their own. Since each giblets was now nostalgic of their life in the rest of the brain, they started roaming the land, looking for new brains that would welcome them. The problem though was that their consiousness was tainted by the illuminati's corruption since their mother brain had illuminati's implants. So the giblets were in fact evil, as if they had eaten an apple and failed to swallow it whole and it got stuck in their throat.

The giblets were so evil that they started to evolve and become more complex, even though their evolution was unguided (since they were evil). They then went to take over brains of pilots so they could fly planes into towers. Giblets that became too complex were forced into careers in politics.

One of the giblets then came upon a nickel on the street, proving the Moon landings were faked in a studio on Mars.

One of the illuminati's implant shrapnel was forced into a career as movie star in Japan, his contract ending somewhere in 2012.

And so this is why Planet X is true and you all owe me 20$.


We need more threads like that, it's fun! :P

So what exactly is the hoax and what proof do you have of it? And no more guessing games - just state what you mean.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

Eh, why bother asking? The nature of the posts shows he's got nothing, and hence has to "spice it up". Same ad-tactic as posting a billboard that simply says "it's coming" then in a few months changing it to "it will soon be here" then "in 14 days" then finding out they're just opening another McDonalds two blocks up the road from the other McDonalds. One day, when I lie and cheat my way into moderatordome, I'll zap these kinda posts to a buttery-goldenbrown toast! MWAHAH....oh. sorry.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

Huh?? Had to leave, thinking that Matt would certainly have answered by the time I got back....

Almost 4 hours later and still nothing??

He should at the very least have the common courtesy to explain what his conspiracy is.

__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

That is his style (on GLP too).

His posts always consist of:

1. Vague and unclear refrences to some hoax or some-such thing.
2. The claim he revealed it world-wide first-time.
3. Questions.
4. Links to semi-related things.
5. Links to other posts by him.

I once figured his "style" was to lead people to the conclusion (that he thought was correct) by guiding them with questions.

[I think that is a valid teaching method.]

However, I personally have never really understood anything he's getting at. There's plenty of his stuff on GLP right now, if you want to get dirty. Even Hubble (space telescope) is a hoax too, apparently. Also Dinosaurs and continental drift.

Cheers,


P.S. I like how the existence of stellar parallax is used by HB's to "explain" why there were no fake stars put in Apollo photos... (I love woo-woo versus woo-woo.)

__________________
Reality moves at the speed of light.
If the text of this post is blue, it's a "Moderator comment".
[ The RULES of the Forum ] [ Forum FAQs ] [ Conspiracy Theory advice ] [ Alternate Theory Advice ]
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team - use the /!\ icon at the top-right of the post.

...

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales

What is your evidence that he needs any 'meds'? To me this looks close to Ad Hom.

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

...

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales

Problem is that's really on the edge, even over, of ad-hom. It's not nice to speculate on people's mental states, even if you disagree with them. Mods have banned CT's for similar things.

__________________
"4th Law of Modern Thermodynamics: Where Mihoshi is, Chaos Reigns." ~W. Hakubi
"Gun control is hitting your target; Recycling is reloading your brass." ~ Lex of Dirty Work.

Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!

Hang on a minute you two. What the heck are you guys talking about? Ever been to this guy's other sites? Take a quick trip over. The man needs help. I'm not being flippant here. He has some major anxiety issues. If he had a broken leg it wouldn't be an Ad Hom to say it needed a splint and some plaster. Yes, I have several semesters of colledge level psychology. Got 4.0 every time. (Edit due to consensus that its an Ad Hom)

Just because you two can't see it doesn't mean it isn't there.

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales

An ad hominem statement need not be false in order to be ad hominem.

__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base

You've never considered the possibility that he might be "pulling your leg"???

How he behaves elsewhere isn't "necessarily" relevant to this disussion. When you start making accusations, it detracts from any argument you present.

__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov

Okay guys, I don't mean any malice. Isn't that a requirement for a Ad Hom?

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales

R.A.F. if we go under the assuption that he's joking then the whole issue is pointless.

__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales