Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 25-March-2007, 11:08 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: The Moon is a Spaceship!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
[edit]How could Astronaut Fred Haise state the crew aboard Apollo 13 could see Frau Mauro? At the time of the accident, Frau Mauro, which was to be the original landing site of the Apollo 13, was in darkness and would remain so for the entire time that the Apollo 13 was near the Moon. In fact it did not reappear until 88 hours after the Apollo 13 had left. By this time the Apollo would have been 19,000 miles away on its way back to Earth, making it impossible for any of the crew to see Frau Mauro during the mission .
Incorrect.

Here are the phases of the Moon for April 1970.



As you can see, Fra Mauro would have been experiencing sunrise on April 15th, the day for the landing, if the accident hadn't happened. The 15th was also the date Apollo 13 experienced pericynthion.

Please check your facts before posting (or C&Ping) more claims.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 02:59 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
How could Astronaut Fred Haise state the crew aboard Apollo 13 could see Frau Mauro? At the time of the accident, Frau Mauro, which was to be the original landing site of the Apollo 13, was in darkness and would remain so for the entire time that the Apollo 13 was near the Moon. In fact it did not reappear until 88 hours after the Apollo 13 had left. By this time the Apollo would have been 19,000 miles away on its way back to Earth, making it impossible for any of the crew to see Frau Mauro during the mission .
Just a comment in addition to Jason Thompson & Mak's above - even if these numbers were correct (they aren't) and that if the first time Fra Mauro came into sunlight, Apollo 13 was 19,000 miles away - the moon would stilll be subtending nearly 7 degrees at that distance (i.e. the moon would have appeared roughly 13 times bigger than it does from the surface of the Earth). The view would still have been beautiful and the Fra Mauro region would have been easily identifiable, especially for people that had been specifically trained to land there and as such who would have been intimately familiar with the area!


(Edited to note that Jason Thompson had addressed this already. Sorry folks - move on, nothing more to see here.)
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 11:57 AM
Freethinker Freethinker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov View Post
Incorrect.

Here are the phases of the Moon for April 1970.



As you can see, Fra Mauro would have been experiencing sunrise on April 15th, the day for the landing, if the accident hadn't happened. The 15th was also the date Apollo 13 experienced pericynthion.

Please check your facts before posting (or C&Ping) more claims.
I would say that you should first check yours.. (in more detail)

Pericynthion plus 2-hour manuever happened according to NASA official timeline at g.e.t. 79:27:39 which is 02:40 GMT 15/4/1970

Fra Mauro at that time was well covered by shadow.


(in the picture: Simulation with Virtual Moon Atlas)

The landing site of Apollo13 was located at 17.550 degrees west longitude and 3.617 degrees south latitude in the highlands north-north-west of Fra Mauro and was covered by sunlight not before 9:30 GMT 15/4/1970. Apollo13 was thousand miles away from the moon at that time and was ready for midcourse corrections. How could Haise see the landing site from that distance? (Note also that Fra Mauro is a small area on the moon no bigger than 58 miles)

Last edited by Freethinker; 26-March-2007 at 12:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 26-March-2007, 12:02 PM
R.A.F.
This message has been deleted by R.A.F.. Reason: pointless post
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 12:43 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
How could Haise see the landing site from that distance?
How far was the spacecraft from the Moon? About 19,000 miles, as already mentioned? Making the Moon appear much larger than it does from here, thus making the landing site, the point that have trained to spot and are hence very familiar with, quite easily visible.

You are also assuming that everything in the shaded part of the Moon is utterly black and invisible, which is not necessarily the case thanks to Earthshine. Fra Mauro could still be within the dark area and be visible.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 12:56 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: The Moon is a Spaceship!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
I would say that you should first check yours.. (in more detail)

Pericynthion plus 2-hour manuever happened according to NASA official timeline at g.e.t. 79:27:39 which is 02:40 GMT 15/4/1970

Fra Mauro at that time was well covered by shadow.


(in the picture: Simulation with Virtual Moon Atlas)
Sorry, pal, but that's not right.

Fra Mauro is just a little bit past where the terminator is at first quarter. During the 15th of April, 1970, the Moon was past first quarter and into its gibbous phase as it approached full Moon. And the Fra Mauro area was not "well-covered", instead first being struck by sunlight on its higher regions and then completely engulfed by light from the Sun.

Plus one must also take into account the Earthshine illumination that Jason Thompson noted. Heck, while looking at a two day old Moon in clear, dark skies, I can make out all the various maria. And that's from ~225,000 miles away.

BTW, how does this jibe with your claim
Quote:
At the time of the accident, Frau Mauro, which was to be the original landing site of the Apollo 13, was in darkness and would remain so for the entire time that the Apollo 13 was near the Moon. In fact it did not reappear until 88 hours after the Apollo 13 had left.
Fra Mauro was experiencing sunrise as Apollo 13 rounded the Moon, and the terminator had moved past it by the time Odyssey and Aquarius left the lunar neighborhood.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 03:42 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,222
Default

Has anyone actually checked whether the statement about seeing Fra Mauro is in the actual A13 transcripts, or was reported in Lovell's book?

I know it was made in the movie, but that's not exactly a reliable primary source. It wouldn't be the first time than an HB used "evidence" from Apollo 13 in a hoax argument.
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 03:45 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 916
Default

That's a good point, Donnie. I had a quick flick through the book and couldn't find the reference, but not knowing exactly when the statement was supposedly made I can't be sure I was even searching the right part.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 04:18 PM
Freethinker Freethinker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov
Sorry, pal, but that's not right.

Fra Mauro is just a little bit past where the terminator is at first quarter. During the 15th of April, 1970, the Moon was past first quarter and into its gibbous phase as it approached full Moon. And the Fra Mauro area was not "well-covered", instead first being struck by sunlight on its higher regions and then completely engulfed by light from the Sun.
So you say that high-resolution lunar map and lunar phases simulation program "Virtual Moon Atlas" is wrong? Have you clicked in my attached picture?
And may I ask what are your sources for your claim?
I urge you to download Free Virtual Moon Atlas and try it for yourself. You will findout that A13 landind site was first hit by sunlight (pass the terminator) after 9:30 GMT. Pericynthion+2hours manuever happened 7 hours earlier. (Pericynthion 9 hours earlier)

About Earthshine: Its a phenomenon mostly visible when the moon is in early crescent phase. On 15th April the moon was 2/3rds.

ps to all: relax, I am not a Hoax Biliever. I am just checking some of their theories..

Last edited by Freethinker; 26-March-2007 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 04:29 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
About Earthshine: Its a phenomenon mostly visible when the moon is in crescent phase. On 15th April the moon was 2/3rds.
Check that: only visible from here during crescent phase. When you're up close and personal with the Moon it's likely to be a different story.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 04:34 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 916
Default

By my calculation that puts Fra Mauro only about 46 miles from the terminator at the time of the PC+2 burn. How wide is Fra Mauro?
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 04:41 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freethinker View Post
Frau Mauro, which was to be the original landing site of the Apollo 13, was in darkness and would remain so for the entire time that the Apollo 13 was near the Moon. In fact it did not reappear until 88 hours after the Apollo 13 had left.
You know, this is just flat-out silly. Are you seriously saying that NASA announced where Apollo 13 would land, but were too stupid to realize that it would be in darkness at the time they were suppose to land??

Not only is that hogwash, it makes zero sense.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 05:33 PM
trinitree88 trinitree88 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,305
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
You know, this is just flat-out silly. Are you seriously saying that NASA announced where Apollo 13 would land, but were too stupid to realize that it would be in darkness at the time they were suppose to land??

Not only is that hogwash, it makes zero sense.
RAF. Agreed. Goes way beyond silly.
__________________
A third rate theory forbids
A second rate theory explains after the fact
A first rate theory predicts...A. Lomonosov
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 06:53 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,222
Default

That's not the claim here. Because of the explosion, A13 reached and left the moon before it was originally scheduled to land. Therefore the landing site may well have still been in darkness or very close to the terminator at the time A13 did its free-return.

The question now is, did anyone actually mention seeing Fra Mauro during the actual flyby, or was that only a throw-away line in the movie Apollo 13? And if the landing site was in fact mentioned during the actual mission, was it or was it not still in darkness, or could it have been recognized by illumination of peaks or by Earthshine?

I seem to recall that we've had this discussion before, but I've had no luck finding it. My vague recollection is that the mention of Fra Mauro occurred in the movie only, not in the actual mission.

ETA: Found it! The 88-hour anomaly claim is from our old pal Cosmic Dave.
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 26-March-2007, 09:36 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 916
Default

Right, the relevant passage from the book by Jim Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger:

Quote:
Fred Haise rather enjoyed being alone in his LEM. He liked the unaccustomed quiet, he liked the unaccustomed elbow room, and he liked, more than either, the brief chance to be in charge of his own ship. Unlike the commander of the three-man lunar crew, who enjoyed near-absolute authority over the vehicles and the men placed in his charge, and unlike the command module pilot, who would assume total command of the mother ship during the two days his crewmates were off flying their LEM, the lunar module pilot would never take the helm of either ship he was aboard. For men who, before joining NASA, had made their living test-flying planes, this could rankle a bit. At three o'clock Wednesday morning, however, as Jim Lovell and Jack Swigert were entering the second hour of their sleep shift in Odyssey, Fred Haise - third in command of a crew of three - found himself drifting around his well-loved Aquarius alone.

"Houston, Aquarius," Haise radioed quietly to Jack Lousma as he floated toward Lovell's vacant station.

"Go Fred," said Lousma.

"I'm looking back at the left-hand corner of the moon," Haise said, "and I can just barely make out the foothills of the Fra Mauro formation. We never did get to see it when we were in there close."

"OK," Lousma said. "It looks like you're not in so close anymore. I'm reading on my monitor here, Fred, that you're 16,214 miles away from the Moon and moving at 4,500 feet per second."
So, according to the book, the observation of Fra Maro took place at several thousand miles out, and several hours after the free return shot round the Moon. According to the information given the crew spent two hours after the PC+2 burn executing the PTC manoeuvre and powering down the LM, then Haise slept for three hours, and he radioed his observation of Fra Mauro two hours into Lovell and Swigert's rest period. Add that all up and we have Haise seeing Fra Mauro some seven hours or so after the PC+2 burn, exactly the time Freethinker says it would be emerging from the shadows of the terminator. This is also about nine hours after pericynthion, just when Dark Moon says the same event should happen.

At 16,214 miles a little trigonometry shows that the Moon as seen from the spacecraft subtends an angle of 7.6 degrees, over 15 times larger than it appears from here. Further, the trigonometry also reveals that the Fra Mauro crater, which is 50 miles across, subtends an angle of 10.6 arcminutes, easily naked eye visible. For comparison, the 376-mile wide Mare Crisium, which is visble from Earth with the naked eye, only subtends between 5.1 and 5.7 arcminutes (due to foreshortening, that would be its length as seen from here). It is therefore no great stretch to think that Fred Haise could have seen the Fra Mauro region with the unaided eye at the time he radioed the observation to Earth.

The only reason I can see that this has even been brought up as an issue by CTs is that in the film Apollo 13 they transplanted this observation of the landing site to the time when the crew was right near the Moon. However, that whole sequence is nothing but dramatic license, since they observe Mare Tranquilitatis, Fra Mauro and the Tsiolkovsky crater in the space of a few seconds, and all after LOS, which is not physically possible.

Bennett and Percy, who made the original claim about the suspect timing (in fact the illustration on the cover of their book suggests it was the inspiration for the title), apparently don't believe artistic licence is allowed in a film and want to claim NASA's endorsement of the film as a claim of total historical accuracy. That is nothing short of laziness when the primary source material is available for inspection. Indeed, if you go back to the primary sources, you find that the events happened at just the right times.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What Apollo treasures do you have? Kiwi Space Exploration 43 26-March-2007 05:37 PM
September 2006 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 0 08-September-2006 09:46 AM
The Sun and Moon ramsquire Astronomy 13 02-September-2005 05:31 PM
Is the moon hollow? cheekychap Conspiracy Theories 24 09-June-2005 11:11 PM
December 2004 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 2 03-December-2004 09:25 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today