Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 07:04 AM
MG1962A's Avatar
MG1962A MG1962A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 571
Default Sometime debunking has rewards

While playing with my debunker on another forum I was browsing some Apollo 11 photos. This one I have never seen. But OMG it takes my breath away, it is just majestic, and for me anyway (sums the entire endeavor up) in one single photo

Enjoy............

Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 07:42 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,926
Default

What took that picture?

Also I had always assumed the CM flew with the pointy end more horizontal to the surface, not pointed straight away like that shows. Granted it's just an assumption, but why would they bother to rotate it to that orientation in the first place?

Line of thought here, and much of this may be way off. I thought the "door" to the CM was at the pointy end. Didn't they have to flip the SM around to get into the LM, then have the same configuration to get back into the CM after lunar lift off? If that's right, and I question my knowledge of it, then why would the CM ever be in the orientation shown while over the Moon?
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 08:03 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

What took that picture?

One of the crew in the LM I'd guess. It would have been taken either before descent to land, or before re-docking on the way back.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 08:17 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
What took that picture?

One of the crew in the LM I'd guess. It would have been taken either before descent to land, or before re-docking on the way back.
Why would it have been so high above the CM? Or is just not as high as it looks?

And yeah, I did assume the LM was on the surface at the time. Rookie mistake.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 08:45 AM
JMV's Avatar
JMV JMV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 394
Default

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-37-5447HR.jpg
It was taken around the time of the CSM separation maneuver. The separation maneuver was done over the landing site and it was a 2.7 fps radially downward SM RCS burn. The spacecrafts are in the right positions and right orientation for that in the picture.

The separation burn was radially downwards, because the spacecrafts had to be in equiperiodic orbits in case the LM fails to burn DOI. Descent Orbit Insertion was a deceleration burn done on the opposite side of the moon from this point and for safety reasons they had to make sure that the LM is coming about three to four kilometers behind the CSM at the point of DOI. To accomplish this the CSM had to take the lower route so that it would reach the opposite intersection point before the LM.

[EDIT: Insertion, not Initiation]

Last edited by JMV; 20-March-2007 at 09:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 08:55 AM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,926
Default

Wow, thanks. That pretty much answered it all.

It is a great pic by the way.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 09:10 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,566
Default

It makes my puny monitor sad! (I hate my monitor.)
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 01:08 PM
sts60 sts60 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,016
Default

Clearly this picture was faked by NASA. Not only are there no stars, but the LM was supposed to go down to the surface of the Moon, and here it is above the CSM. As we all know, you can't get somewhere in space by going the other way! Plus, I see part of the matting used by the photofakery crew along the lower right side.
__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 01:25 PM
Sigma_Orionis's Avatar
Sigma_Orionis Sigma_Orionis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
Clearly this picture was faked by NASA. Not only are there no stars, but the LM was supposed to go down to the surface of the Moon, and here it is above the CSM. As we all know, you can't get somewhere in space by going the other way! Plus, I see part of the matting used by the photofakery crew along the lower right side.
Yeah, right, and now you will tell me that you know that cause you work with spacecraft like the Thunderbird 3
__________________
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 02:03 PM
Nicolas's Avatar
Nicolas Nicolas is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 11,228
Default

Thunderbird 3, not the Thunderbird 3. It's clear you are no real spacecraft engineer.

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 02:30 PM
Sigma_Orionis's Avatar
Sigma_Orionis Sigma_Orionis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 1,956
Default

No I am not, I'm not even a real plastic model plane kit builder
__________________
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 03:29 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMV View Post
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-37-5447HR.jpg
It was taken around the time of the CSM separation maneuver.
Thanks for the higher res and explaination.
With the first picture, it took me a while to figure out that I was looking at the CM and not a crater.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 03:46 PM
AtomicDog's Avatar
AtomicDog AtomicDog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
Thanks for the higher res and explaination.
With the first picture, it took me a while to figure out that I was looking at the CM and not a crater.
You mean the opposite shadow direction didn't clue you in?
__________________
"Time travel gives me a headache." - Capt. Kathryn Janeway
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 20-March-2007, 11:08 PM
Occam's Avatar
Occam Occam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma_Orionis View Post
No I am not, I'm not even a real plastic model plane kit builder
Careful what you admit to - you are rapidly losing your rights to nerdship
__________________
This is not an idea to be tossed aside lightly - it should be thrown with great force
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 12:32 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMV View Post
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/Hi...-37-5447HR.jpg
It was taken around the time of the CSM separation maneuver. The separation maneuver was done over the landing site and it was a 2.7 fps radially downward SM RCS burn. The spacecrafts are in the right positions and right orientation for that in the picture.
Wow - I've seen that image before, but never in Hi-Res. It is just stunning.
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 12:55 PM
Sigma_Orionis's Avatar
Sigma_Orionis Sigma_Orionis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occam View Post
Careful what you admit to - you are rapidly losing your rights to nerdship

Well considering how every time glued the things I'd use so much it would damage the plastic and that every time I painted them it looked like a job made by Al Bundy, I think it's safe to admit it

Besides I took the Nerd Test (take a look at my Blog ) and got 98% so I am not too worried
__________________
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 04:09 PM
SpitfireIX's Avatar
SpitfireIX SpitfireIX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,115
Send a message via AIM to SpitfireIX
Talking

It makes my puny monitor sad! (I hate my monitor.)

I'm looking at it right now on a 24" monitor in one of the CAD labs at school.
__________________
--Doug

"When your statics problem becomes a dynamics problem, you're in trouble." --me

Moor's Law: "As you go from freshman engineering to Ph.D., the amount of work required per credit hour doubles approximately every 18 months." --me, inspired by Prof. Scott Moor
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 04:11 PM
Tog_'s Avatar
Tog_ Tog_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 2,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigma_Orionis View Post
Well considering how every time glued the things I'd use so much it would damage the plastic and that every time I painted them it looked like a job made by Al Bundy, I think it's safe to admit it
But did you at least "fly" the thing aroung the room every time you stuck a new part to the mess? Bonus points for making airplane noises while you did it.
__________________
A Nerd can figure out how long it will take the original Enterprise traveling at warp 6.5 to travel from Regulus to Antares.
A Geek will think he can use that to pick up a girl in a bar.
A Dork knows he can't pick up the girl with it, but will hang around for hours anyway, just in case she asks.
She might. You never know.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 05:51 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog_ View Post
But did you at least "fly" the thing aroung the room every time you stuck a new part to the mess? Bonus points for making airplane noises while you did it.
In my neighborhood the proper noise for a prop plane was "Eeeeeyyyoooooowwwwww!" -- with the sound modulations synced to the swoop of the plane, of course. For jets it was more like "Sssssshhhhhhh!" (but there really isn't a proper way to write that sound).
__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 21-March-2007, 06:49 PM
Sigma_Orionis's Avatar
Sigma_Orionis Sigma_Orionis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 1,956
Default