Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2007, 05:07 PM
Runningman Runningman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 3
Default NASA and Schumann Resonance

I have recently been battling Geopathic healing and have come accross a very specific claim that should be easy to refute. Unfortunately, I don't really want to embarrass myself by writing to NASA, and surely someone must have done this already.

Geopathic healing, water dousing, and Feng Shui all make claims about earth vibrations. This site (http://www.fengshui.co.uk/GeopathicStress.htm specifically states that "NASA builds in imitations of this earth's electromagnetic frequency into their space shuttels, known as Schumann Resonators to safeguard the health of astronauts when they are outside of the influence of the earth and its vital frequency."

Has anyone ever debunked this?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2007, 06:01 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,574
Default

Welcome to the board!

How do they determine what's "outside the influence of the Earth" in the first place?
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2007, 08:10 PM
sts60 sts60 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,017
Default

Hi, runningman. Welcome to the board.

The simple answer is that the claim is factually incorrect; NASA does not incorporate "Schumann resonators" on the Shuttle. Period.

The premise is also wrong. Earth doesn't have a fundamental frequency; it has all sorts of different characteristic electromagnetic and acoustic frequencies. Schumann resonance, due to the "waveguide" formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere, causes a set of characteristic frequencies in the ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) band.

Actually, there seems to be a decent debunking of this nonsense claim here.
__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2007, 08:14 PM
Runningman Runningman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 3
Default

Well, basically, they start with a little bit of science. Schumann resonance actually does exist. It refers to electromagnetic waves that travel between the surface of the earth and the ionosphere.

The pseudoscientists have developed an intricate theory that these waves are impacted by underground water, and that there are places on the earth where the waves are distorted. Since we have evolved over millions of years to depend on a specific frequency, being in the wrong place is responsible for all manner of health problems.

So, now the medicine show enters the picture. You can correct these problems by hiring someone to rearrange your furniture. You can also hire someone to tap into these forces and find water for you.

However, several of them make the claim that even NASA recognizes the necessity of these waves and equips space craft with devices to replicate this resonance. (Any vehicle above the ionosphere would be outside of the influence of these waves.) This is a specific claim that should be able to be refuted. I'm just wondering if anyone has already done this?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-August-2007, 08:25 PM
Runningman Runningman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks, sts60, that reference was just what I was looking for.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 04:17 AM
dgavin dgavin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Epi And b c
Posts: 1,147
Default

Touching on Water Dousing, I'll step out on a limb and say that I have practicle experience using dousing rods to find water, for a well on my dad's place.

However I can not explain -why- it works. However I have three thoughts on what might cause it to seem to work.

1. Gravitaional changes. The water bearing strata is denser then dry strata, therefore a minor increase in gravity is picked up by the rods, causing them to tilt in towards each other. Not really a pratical idea by a remote posibility.

2. Changes in Ground Conductivity. Self explainatory, in that water increases the conductivity of soil. The rods pick this up somehow. Also Not really a pratical idea by a remote posibility.

3. Random chance. During dousing you get a lot of rod cross overs. Random chance dictates that some of these will be over a water source. This is probably how dousing really functions.
__________________
"There is no problem that cannot be solved by a suitable application of high explosives" - US Army Demolitions School

http://worldsofothersuns.home.comcast.net/
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 11:34 AM
Z28Jerry Z28Jerry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 157
Default

Random Chance.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 06:06 PM
Kelfazin's Avatar
Kelfazin Kelfazin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgavin View Post
Touching on Water Dousing, I'll step out on a limb and say that I have practicle experience using dousing rods to find water, for a well on my dad's place.

However I can not explain -why- it works. However I have three thoughts on what might cause it to seem to work.

1. Gravitaional changes. The water bearing strata is denser then dry strata, therefore a minor increase in gravity is picked up by the rods, causing them to tilt in towards each other. Not really a pratical idea by a remote posibility.

2. Changes in Ground Conductivity. Self explainatory, in that water increases the conductivity of soil. The rods pick this up somehow. Also Not really a pratical idea by a remote posibility.

3. Random chance. During dousing you get a lot of rod cross overs. Random chance dictates that some of these will be over a water source. This is probably how dousing really functions.
If you can do it in front of the JREF you could be rich
__________________
I was just sitting here contemplating the immortal words of Socrates who said, "I drank what?"

"Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot." --Carl Sagan "Pale Blue Dot"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 07:25 PM
Grashtel Grashtel is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgavin View Post
3. Random chance. During dousing you get a lot of rod cross overs. Random chance dictates that some of these will be over a water source. This is probably how dousing really functions.
Yep, that and if you dig a deep enough hole pretty much anywhere you will usually find water (though how much and weather it refills at a worthwhile rate is a different matter) which is counted usually as a hit by dowsers.
__________________
Girl: Mister Darwin! The stupid people are breeding and taking over the planet!
Charles Darwin: Tut tut, little girl, don't worry! I'll take care of them with my CHAINSAW OF NATURAL SELECTION! Ahahahahahhaha!!!!!!
-QUeen of Wands 12/08/2003
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-August-2007, 08:57 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 11,373
Talking

You know, if you look at our new banner, the BA might not be boxing on the moon, he might be dousing water (look at how he's holding his hands) and the artist just didn't do a good job of showing the rod.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 10:10 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
The premise is also wrong. Earth doesn't have a fundamental frequency; it has all sorts of different characteristic electromagnetic and acoustic frequencies. Schumann resonance, due to the "waveguide" formed by the Earth's surface and the ionosphere, causes a set of characteristic frequencies in the ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) band.

Actually, there seems to be a decent debunking of this nonsense claim here.
I respond to this in my next post about what NASA might actually have, and why.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that.

I am human. Fully human.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-August-2007, 10:17 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runningman View Post
However, several of them make the claim that even NASA recognizes the necessity of these waves and equips space craft with devices to replicate this resonance. (Any vehicle above the ionosphere would be outside of the influence of these waves.) This is a specific claim that should be able to be refuted. I'm just wondering if anyone has already done this?
I wonder if they're confusing Schumann Resonance with the Schuler Cycle, also known as Schuler Tuning? Discovered by Max Schuler, a German engineer who's principle is used in all mechanical gyroscopes to minimize the effects of translation on errors. The principles are still used in B-52s, and other older aircraft.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that.

I am human. Fully human.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2007, 01:59 AM
dgavin dgavin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Epi And b c
Posts: 1,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelfazin View Post
If you can do it in front of the JREF you could be rich
Bring them on! I don't mind being an experiment to prove that dousing works by random chance. If it turns out to be gravitational or conductivity, I'd have to eat my hat on TV I guess.

Would be entertaining eaither way.
__________________
"There is no problem that cannot be solved by a suitable application of high explosives" - US Army Demolitions School

http://worldsofothersuns.home.comcast.net/
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2007, 12:10 PM
sts60 sts60 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,017
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
I wonder if they're confusing Schumann Resonance with the Schuler Cycle, also known as Schuler Tuning? Discovered by Max Schuler, a German engineer who's principle is used in all mechanical gyroscopes to minimize the effects of translation on errors. The principles are still used in B-52s, and other older aircraft.
Here's the thing I like about this forum. Not only does the conversation wander to cover a lot of interesting information, but much of it is just so darned useful in everyday situations. I mean, here I've been blithely just hopping into my F-16 and rolling out in the morning on the way to work all this time, and I've not once taken the Schuler effect on my INS into account...

Interestingly, the last link contained this bit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Gums' Posted: Feb 18, 2004 - 07:15 PM
We are talking late 60's technology. The A-7D used the same computer that the Lunar Module used to put Armstrong and others on the moon! Pretty capable machine in its time.
A bit of casual searching didn't enlighten me. Does anybody else know about this?
__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago."
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-August-2007, 11:41 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sts60 View Post
I mean, here I've been blithely just hopping into my F-16 and rolling out in the morning on the way to work all this time, and I've not once taken the Schuler effect on my INS into account...
Ah. That explains the drift!

Quote:
Interestingly, the last link contained this bit (about the A-7D sharing a computer with the Lunar Lander).

A bit of casual searching didn't enlighten me. Does anybody else know about this?
Obscure, but true.

If you really want to get your feet wet with early, practical computer applications, visit the Memorial at Pearl Harbor. Take some time to wander through the naval museum next to the main building, particularly the manually-cranked fire control computers used to calculate (wind) shell ballistics based upon not just wind, but atmospheric conditions, as well.
__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that.

I am human. Fully human.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-August-2007, 01:41 AM
PhantomWolf's Avatar
PhantomWolf PhantomWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lost Deimos Moon Base
Posts: 5,651
Send a message via ICQ to PhantomWolf Send a message via AIM to PhantomWolf Send a message via MSN to PhantomWolf Send a message via Yahoo to PhantomWolf
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgavin View Post
Bring them on! I don't mind being an experiment to prove that dousing works by random chance. If it turns out to be gravitational or conductivity, I'd have to eat my hat on TV I guess.



Would be entertaining eaither way.


Either way you wouldn't win the $million. The $million is for a proven Paranormal effect. If you proved that it was caused by a normal effect that we just hadn't thought of, it'd no longer be paranormal and thus would be Ineligible for the money.
__________________
Howling from the Shadows

It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality. --- JayUtah

You can't reason an irrational person out of an irrational belief. --- Noclevername

Apollo: The History and the Hoax
Enter the World of Athran
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-August-2007, 02:22 PM
dgavin dgavin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Epi And b c
Posts: 1,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomWolf View Post
Either way you wouldn't win the $million. The $million is for a proven Paranormal effect. If you proved that it was caused by a normal effect that we just hadn't thought of, it'd no longer be paranormal and thus would be Ineligible for the money.
Darn it! I so wanted to by a Prowler with the money too!
__________________
"There is no problem that cannot be solved by a suitable application of high explosives" - US Army Demolitions School

http://worldsofothersuns.home.comcast.net/
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2007, 04:32 PM
Mister Earl's Avatar
Mister Earl Mister Earl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,058
Default

Mr. Randi has stated many times that Dowsing is an acceptable test for the JREF prize of $1,000,000. He has had many dowsers test, and so far none have won. If you legitamately believe that you can dowse water, then go ahead and fill out thier application. If you read the JREF rules, you'll note that they cannot legally back out of a test. If you do your dowsing, per a test co-designed by both you and JREF, and you PASS, then go from the initial test to one attended by JREF witnesses. If you pass that, you get the $1,000,000.

Seriously, if you read thier rules, you'll see they don't leave any wriggle-room for themselves. But I highly advise you to conduct some basic double-blind tests yourself so that you can be sure you can actually do this. Here's a simple test you can do:

1.) Get two friends to assist you, ten cardboard boxes, and ten empty plastic milk containers. Fill one full of water.
2.) The first person takes the materials in another room, arranges the milk jugs, and covers each with a box.
3.) The person leaves the room, and you go in with your witness to dowse. Pick the box you think has the water, then you both leave without touching the boxes. Write down which you think it was.
4.) First person goes back in the room, and rearranges ALL boxes so none are in thier original position.
5.) Repeat steps 1-4 nine more times.

Statistically speaking, you should hit the water once. Get three or more, and you have something...
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-August-2007, 04:45 PM
Mister Earl's Avatar
Mister Earl Mister Earl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,058
Default

But just to give you something to think about:
1.) If dowsing rods can really detect water, why can it detect water under many tens of feet of dirt, yet not be deflected by the large water source that is your body?
2.) If you take your dowsing rods to a lake, stream, or pool, why don't you get a very strong deflection?
Reply With Quote