Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 05:30 PM
sts60 sts60 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,103
Default

Hello, impactstyles. Welcome (back) to the board. What was your previous handle?

No, I don't think you're crazy, but I do think you might want to switch to decaf for a while.

I am not certain UFOs don't exist (as alien spacecraft). I don't think they do because the evidence is crummy. A series of fakes, misidentifications, anecdotes, and ambiguous and unrepeatable data. And I am looking at the big picture. Yes, I've worked in aerospace, and I've worked in the defense field, which gives me some insight into the nature of the claims and also into the behavior of the organizations you mention. I've also learned something about cultural reinforcement and groupthink and the malleability of memory in particular and subjective experience in general.

I will become a believer in ET visits the instant I am shown hard evidence - not anecdotes, not unverifiable claims, not ambiguous data. Really - I want to believe it - it would be amazing to know the neighbors have already dropped in to visit.
__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago."
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 06:04 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,691
Default

Welcome back impactstyles.

I don't think you are crazy, I just don't think you are correct. I am not a government agent and no one pays me for posting here (I wish).

The reason I do not believe that UFOs are visitors from other worlds is that I have never seen any credible physical evidence of this. It does not matter how many people claim to have seen "something", people can be mistaken in what they see. And it is not up to me to prove they don't exist (that's logically impossible), it is up to the believers to prove they do. That's how science works.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 08:35 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 16,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Who is paying you people and how much?
No one could pay me enough to betray history. No one. You may not believe me, but it is absolutely true. If I believed that Apollo was a hoax, that Roswell was really an alien crash, that any of the other conspiracies were true, no one could possibly pay me enough to claim otherwise.

I don't believe we have been visited by alien spacecraft; it's certainly possible that we have and the evidence isn't there, but I don't believe it. This is, naturally, different from belief or lack thereof in the existence of extraterrestrial life; I do believe in that. Without evidence, admittedly, but I do believe in it. However, I see no reason to believe that alien civilizations have visited Earth without evidence. And, realistically, there isn't any. There are confused eyewitness reports that are generally explicable by known phenomena. There are fuzzy photographs, many of which are obvious fakes.

However, I cannot fathom an alien civilization coming many, many lightyears, buzzing a few fields, and taking off again. I cannot fathom them being advanced enough to come that vast distance and being seen if they don't want to be. I cannot fathom them, in short, behaving the way they must be behaving if the UFO reports are, in fact, reports of alien spacecraft. It doesn't make any sense to me.

I am not a government employee. I never have been. And I can assure you that my disability check is nowhere near enough money to get me to lie about anything, much less to betray history. It's simply ridiculous to me to assume that it is, and I find it one of the most offensive things that it is possible to suggest about me.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 08:39 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 9,951
Default

Quote:
No one could pay me enough to betray history. No one. You may not believe me, but it is absolutely true. If I believed that Apollo was a hoax, that Roswell was really an alien crash, that any of the other conspiracies were true, no one could possibly pay me enough to claim otherwise.
Ditto here.
As an archeologist, the past is my passion and I would never lie about it. I would never want to cause ignorance to anyone, because spreading ignorance is to poison the mind.
Money offered to me for that purpose would be fouler than used tissues.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 10:28 PM
SLF:JAQ SFDJS SLF:JAQ SFDJS is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Hi. Let me begin by saying I am not new here. I visited this site, and posted, frequently about 6-7 years ago after watching the fox special on the moon hoax conspiracy theory. While you were all very knowledgeable and basically pulled me from the CT dark side by thoroughly answering all my questions to satisfaction (except the one about how the stars must have looked from the surface of the moon, why has not one astronaut commented on this because it must have looked beyond amazing with no atmosphere and light pollution in the way) and someone tells me the astronauts were too busy to notice, HOGWASH! But that is another discussion for another time.

Let me begin today’s post with some angst and rudeness (I apologize in advance)

Who is paying you people and how much? My god you call the CT people crazy but you are just as bad. There is a center you know and you all are wayyyyyyyy off from it. If this was politics, the Conspiracy Theorists would be all the way to the left of center, and you guys (skeptics to say the least) would be all the way to the right of center. You use this particular thread to discount UFO/UAP/Flying saucers, whatever you want to call them. You make all kinds of jokes but you forgot that there are never certainties in life. Theorists are CERTAIN Flying Saucers are real, and you skeptics are CERTAIN they do not exist. Now don’t tell me you are not certain because that is you politically correct way of denying your own reality. You do not believe. But your nonbelieving is just as whacky and out there as the believers. It really only leads me to one conclusion and that is; scattered among you skeptics are ex government employees, defense contractors, aerospace engineers et al. Who are doing nothing but spreading misinfo and disinfo. There has been so much government interest in this phenomena, that if it was as ridiculous as you claim, would warrant literally ZERO government research and involvement, yet ever since the "Battle for Los Angeles" the government has shown a keen interest in the matter, has compiled numerous reports/investigations, has step by step instructions for Air force personnel on how to react, and what to do when they encounter one. I know you are all probably cracking up laughing at me but what about the disclosure project with all the ex military, airline pilots etc? You think these highly trained highly qualified and professional people mistook ALL their accounts, that is beyond ludicrous and I truly believe you agree with me but will not admit it because you are here to spread propaganda about how insane the idea of a potential craft that is not of terrestrial origin is flying in our skies, invading our airspace at will. Now I know there are tons of secret military projects that get mistaken for flying saucers but like Stanton Friedman says "millions of radioactive isotopes are not fissionable, but a small few are. We do not care about the ones that aren’t; we only care about the small few. Heck even if literally ONE sighting by ANYONE over the years is credible, then it warrants serious investigation. Sure in part you are correct that it is a societal phenomenon. But you are forgetting what caused it to leak into pop culture....Roswell. We all know the details inside and out of this case, but my question is, ranchers in New Mexico were very familiar with weather balloons, as was the military, yet the story magically changes and the rancher is ordered to remain silent on the matter. Well that’s weird, see it is one thing for the rancher to mistake the crash debris, but the military????????? I mean it's staring at us right in front of our faces, yet you continue to mock and poke fun ridiculing the whole subject, furthering the mainstream science agenda of ignoring every and any credible sighting. Then you all question why sightings have gone down, why the shapes of saucers have changed etc... For a bunch of smart guys you are not looking at the big picture here. Sightings have not gone down, just do some worldwide research on the subject, and you will see constant sightings across this globe, it is just that you are so closed minded you already made the decision long ago these do not exist and are not real so you make no attempt to research the matter but then come to a public forum and spread lies that sightings have gone down and the craft has changed from hubcaps to globs of goo. If you did the required research necessary to make an informed comment, the classic saucer shape still is sighted regularly around the globe, but you would not know that. I will admit this entire field is littered with hoaxes, misinformation, disinformation, and flat out liars on both ends of the spectrum which makes it painfully difficult to sift through when trying to get some serious credible cases, but with enough elbow grease you would be surprised at the current sightings/images that are out there today.


I know none of this matters you will call me crazy, make fun of me, and continue to spread your propaganda, and it is truly sad that the future scientists will look to people like you for guidance and all you do is perpetuate the government agenda of ridicule whenever the question of "is it possible advanced life forms are visiting this planet and have been all throughout recorded history" is posed. History will not look back at this time period in a positive light, we live in a dark ages where anything outside of mainstream science is ignored or laughed at and suppressed. This is how we grow stagnant as humanity and it is sickening. Before the uber secretive cold war scientific and technological advances were public knowledge, now everything’s classified for the sake of national security and it holds the normal amateur engineers back from inventing the next form of transportation etc... Imagine Newton’s works or Einstein’s works were never released due to matters of National Security. It is disgusting.


In conclusion I just want to say you are all just as crazy and just as ill informed as the UFO believers out there, the only difference is you are on the opposite end of the spectrum.




Bravo!!!! Atleast 90%
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 11:00 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,691
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLF:JAQ SFDJS View Post
Bravo!!!! Atleast 90%
Which 90%? Do you believe we are being paid as government stooges? (and yes, that is a direct question, and I expect an answer - you know the rules)
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 11-December-2007, 11:51 PM
SLF:JAQ SFDJS SLF:JAQ SFDJS is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 102
Default

Government stooges? NO. I disagree that your are all crazy part.
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 12:12 AM
pzkpfw's Avatar
pzkpfw pzkpfw is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In front of PC
Posts: 2,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLF:JAQ SFDJS View Post
Bravo!!!! Atleast 90%
How is a number calculated with no facts to base it on?
__________________
Reality moves at the speed of light.
If the text of this post is blue, it's a "Moderator comment".
[ The RULES of the Forum ] [ Forum FAQs ] [ Conspiracy Theory advice ] [ Alternate Theory Advice ]
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team - use the /!\ icon at the top-right of the post.
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 02:30 AM
astrophotographer's Avatar
astrophotographer astrophotographer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
There has been so much government interest in this phenomena, that if it was as ridiculous as you claim, would warrant literally ZERO government research and involvement, yet ever since the "Battle for Los Angeles" the government has shown a keen interest in the matter, has compiled numerous reports/investigations, has step by step instructions for Air force personnel on how to react, and what to do when they encounter one.

The "battle for LA" really had nothing to do with UFO investigations but if that is what you think, then feel free but there is plenty of good explanations for this event. As far as I know, following the event and once the military was satisified it was not an actual air attack, the matter was dropped and there was no further interest until.......


Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
But you are forgetting what caused it to leak into pop culture....Roswell.
Actually, it was the Kenneth Arnold sighting a few weeks previous. Had Arnold not reported his sighting to the media and the media ran it in the papers, nobody in NM would have heard of Flying saucers and nobody would have thought they recovered a "flying disc".

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
We all know the details inside and out of this case, but my question is, ranchers in New Mexico were very familiar with weather balloons, as was the military, yet the story magically changes and the rancher is ordered to remain silent on the matter.
One weather balloon is easily identifiable. However, not many were multiple balloons with all sorts of devices (launch rings, parachutes, ballast tubes, radar reflectors, electronic equipment) attached. You are also quick with the fact the rancher was ordered to remain silent. There is absolutley no factual evidence to support this claim. In fact he told the media what he found. Oh....that is right, he was directed by the military to tell a fake story.


Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Well that’s weird, see it is one thing for the rancher to mistake the crash debris, but the military?????????
Correction. A few officers apparently misidentified something they were not familiar with. They were pilots and not weather officers. You put a lot of weight on the opinions of military personnel. As an ex-senior enlisted, I can tell you without a doubt that even the officers are not super intelligent. I know of one instance where several officers were misidentifying Venus as possible ship at night - an enlisted man corrected them after checking some astronomy software. However, back to the main subject, we are not talking about balloons, which would not be too hard to identify, but the reflectors and other materials that were attached to the balloons. In Ohio, a few people thought these objects were "flying discs". To add to the confusion, on the date of the misidentification there was an article in the morning Roswell paper describing "flying discs" that were recovered in Texas. They were said to have been constructed of foil like materials. What were these radar reflectors made of? Aluminum Foil, of course.

Lastly, one would think that if it were something really extraordinary, a picture or two would have been taken by all the people that supposedly handled it. There is not one photograph of any of this supposedly strange debris until it arrived at Fort Worth. What do these photographs show? Radar reflectors and balloon materials.

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
In conclusion I just want to say you are all just as crazy and just as ill informed as the UFO believers out there, the only difference is you are on the opposite end of the spectrum.
I don't consider myself ill-informed. I have looked at this subject extensively. Maybe my skepticism prevents me from seeing it from a neutral point of view but that is who I am. However, don't take my word for it. I suggest you look at what a panel of scientists (the 1997 sturrock panel) said about the subject after being presented a one-sided presentation from pro-UFO scientists:

It was clear that at least a few reported incidents might have involved rare but significant phenomena such as electrical activity high above thunderstorms (e.g., sprites) or rare cases of radar ducting. On the other hand, the review panel was not convinced that any of the evidence involved currently unknown physical processes or pointed to the involvement of an extraterrestrial intelligence.

These scientists had no prior interest in the subject and were exposed to only one side of the argument. Yet, they could not see anything in the data. All went back to their studies and did not suddenly find a need to study UFOs. This is not the first time this has happened since 1947. Each time a scientific panel looks at the subject, they all come to the same conclusion. That being that there is no need to think that anything extraordinary is happening. To me, that says a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 03:59 AM
Halcyon Dayz's Avatar
Halcyon Dayz Halcyon Dayz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nederland - Sol III
Posts: 1,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
You do not believe.
Exactly.

Skeptics require evidence.
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis
Join the Illuminati
Reply With Quote
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 02:36 PM
impactstyles impactstyles is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
Default

Hi everyone it is me again. Thank you for your thought provoking replies, much appreciated. Again I apologize if I came across as rude yesterday. I honestly do not remember my username from the 6 or 7 years ago, but I spent all of my time back then on the moon hoax conspiracy thread and photoshopped images of my little black dog on the lunar surface if anyone out there remembers those pics. Any who, the gentleman that answered my Roswell comments/questions makes a lot of sense, but I find something fishy about the entire story. The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it? Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about, but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet. There is the other gentleman, whose name escapes me now, who owns a piece of "something" that just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet. There are the Chinese dropa stones. Then there are all the stories throughout history. I know you are all well aware of the ancient astronaut theories. But I digress. I don't know how many of you get the science channel on your local cable service, and if you do I don’t know how many of you watched the special yesterday about the "lost" Apollo 11 moon tapes that were recently found and aired. During this special they interviewed a few of the "Houston" guys as well as a new interview with Buzz Aldrin. Here's the kicker if you did not watch it. Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it. They showed the video on the special, but they said it was footage of a later Apollo mission, yet it was the same UFO. Then Buzz goes on to talk about his experience with cosmic rays as he tried to go to sleep. Finally Buzz, and the narrator concurs that nobody "cared" about the ufo following alongside them because they were so caught up with trying to figure out the cosmic rays. But this is exactly what really upsets me. That is proof. Just because you can not touch it or see it today, that was proof with the darned astronaut admitting so, but then they just gloss over it and focus on the cosmic ray scenario. Kind of like how our current president tells us Bin Laden is no longer a concern and most of America is like "Oh, no concern anymore, OK" Meanwhile he is the MAN to get. It makes no sense. To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence. Yet the way it was presented, no one would think twice about it. It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.

Sorry I am rambling on here but another thing I want to address to the skeptics out there is this. Again why all the government interest? I could understand a few reports to throw people (and Russia) off the trail of our black budget military ops, but for these reports to continue for years on end just does not make sense if the phenomena was fabricated or easily explained by "swamp gas" or "Venus".

I anxiously await your replies.
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 02:55 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: What happened to all the flying saucers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
[edit]Any who, the gentleman that answered my Roswell comments/questions makes a lot of sense, but I find something fishy about the entire story. The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it?
What hard evidence? And, once again it's not a matter of belief.
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about, but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet.
Where are the documented independent lab test results that demonstrate this claim?
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
There is the other gentleman, whose name escapes me now, who owns a piece of "something" that just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet. There are the Chinese dropa stones.
Once again what are the results of physical and chemical analysis of these objects?
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Then there are all the stories throughout history. I know you are all well aware of the ancient astronaut theories. But I digress.
A poster here has as his signature (IIRC) "The sum of anecdotes is not equal to data."
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
I don't know how many of you get the science channel on your local cable service, and if you do I don’t know how many of you watched the special yesterday about the "lost" Apollo 11 moon tapes that were recently found and aired. During this special they interviewed a few of the "Houston" guys as well as a new interview with Buzz Aldrin. Here's the kicker if you did not watch it. Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it. They showed the video on the special, but they said it was footage of a later Apollo mission, yet it was the same UFO. Then Buzz goes on to talk about his experience with cosmic rays as he tried to go to sleep. Finally Buzz, and the narrator concurs that nobody "cared" about the ufo following alongside them because they were so caught up with trying to figure out the cosmic rays.
You might want to check out this thread where the facts of this matter are discussed in detail.
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
But this is exactly what really upsets me. That is proof. Just because you can not touch it or see it today, that was proof with the darned astronaut admitting so, but then they just gloss over it and focus on the cosmic ray scenario.
It's proof that things in space can be temporarily misidentified by even the best of us, but with investigation and objective evidence, a correct identification can be made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Kind of like how our current president tells us Bin Laden is no longer a concern and most of America is like "Oh, no concern anymore, OK" Meanwhile he is the MAN to get. It makes no sense.
Careful with the political content. Check the rules if you haven't been here for a while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence. Yet the way it was presented, no one would think twice about it. It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.
No, they finally figured it out. See the thread referenced above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Sorry I am rambling on here but another thing I want to address to the skeptics out there is this. Again why all the government interest? I could understand a few reports to throw people (and Russia) off the trail of our black budget military ops, but for these reports to continue for years on end just does not make sense if the phenomena was fabricated or easily explained by "swamp gas" or "Venus".

I anxiously await your replies.
What government interest? There's been little since Project Blue Book closed after demonstrating the various objects which had been mostly misidentified did not constitute a threat from the U.S.S.R. The reports continuing makes fine sense, since, as time goes by, new generations look at the sky and repeat the same mistakes.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 02:59 PM
astrophotographer's Avatar
astrophotographer astrophotographer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Any who, the gentleman that answered my Roswell comments/questions makes a lot of sense, but I find something fishy about the entire story.
I admire your skepticism. Please apply it to the crashed spaceship story which is much less likely than a top secret balloon project, which was operating not far away from the debris site.


Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it? Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about, but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet. There is the other gentleman, whose name escapes me now, who owns a piece of "something" that just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet.
And your source for this information is? I have not heard of any such debris. All debris presented to scientists have always turned out to be something ordinary.




Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
But I digress. I don't know how many of you get the science channel on your local cable service, and if you do I don’t know how many of you watched the special yesterday about the "lost" Apollo 11 moon tapes that were recently found and aired. During this special they interviewed a few of the "Houston" guys as well as a new interview with Buzz Aldrin. Here's the kicker if you did not watch it. Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it. They showed the video on the special, but they said it was footage of a later Apollo mission, yet it was the same UFO. Then Buzz goes on to talk about his experience with cosmic rays as he tried to go to sleep. Finally Buzz, and the narrator concurs that nobody "cared" about the ufo following alongside them because they were so caught up with trying to figure out the cosmic rays. But this is exactly what really upsets me. That is proof.
Actually, Aldrin was edited in the TV show. He concluded that it was probably one of the SLA panels from S-IVB stage and said so when somebody inquired to him about his comments on that very show.

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
I could understand a few reports to throw people (and Russia) off the trail of our black budget military ops, but for these reports to continue for years on end just does not make sense if the phenomena was fabricated or easily explained by "swamp gas" or "Venus".

I anxiously await your replies.
The problem is that about 75-95% (depending on what UFOlogist/source you quote) of these sightings can be explained as ordinary events like "Venus" (called the "queen of UFOs" by Ufologist Valle). With such a large quantity of misperceptions/misidentifications, can the remaining 5-25% just be simple misperceptions that were reported so badly that an identification can't be made? It is on the burden of those making the claim that UFOs are something new to science and may be ET visiting to provide proof. Like Bigfoot, Nessie, fortune telling, talking to the dead, etc. the evidence is never very convincing and always boils down to "The witness would never lie or be mistaken". History has shown that witnesses do lie and witnesses make mistakes about what they see. Therefore, the most logical explanation for most, if not all, UFO reports is they are simply misperceptions/misidentifications/hoaxes. Until good solid evidence can be gathered to show otherwise, UFOs will remain a fringe topic that most scientists will ignore.
Reply With Quote
  #164 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 03:09 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,302
Default

The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it?

I don't think you understand what we mean by "hard" evidence.

Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about...

There is no crashed saucer or alien body about which we know even unofficially. There is only rumor and supposition, just as there is rumor and supposition about the appearance of the Virgin Mary in a tree stump a few blocks from my house.

but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet.

Not natural doesn't rule out artificial. Most people have detritus in their bodies. I carried a splinter for nearly 10 years, and I still have rocks in my knee from a spill I took when I was eight.

I've read dozens of biopsy claims, and none yet that describes something that cannot have been produced on Earth (e.g., industrial alloys, plastics, etc.) The reports say it's not "naturally occurring," but something doesn't have to be naturally occurring in order to wind up in our bodies. Man-made stuff winds up there too. For some reason, UFO enthusiasts inexplicably believe that if it didn't arise through some natural process, it must therefore be from some space culture.

...just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet.

You mean "anything from this planet" that fell within the researcher's imagination. It is impossible to rule out Earth-bound causes completely. Such determinations simply rule out what the researchers believe to be likely candidate causes.

There is a huge difference between, "This isn't any of the ten things I tested for," and "This is something from an alien culture and therefore proof that such a culture exists." Yet the UFO enthusiasts want us to believe the latter. None of what has been presented is what a scientist would term "hard evidence." What has been presented is a conclusion by default or presumption: it's presumed to be an alien artifact until proven otherwise. That's simply the fallacy of begging the question.

Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it.

Buzz Aldrin's alleged UFO has been covered at length. It hasn't been secret at all. It was a piece of the Saturn V rocket.

That is proof.

No, it isn't. UFO enthusiasts simply tell only the part of the story they want to believe. They omit Aldrin's and others' later statements that the thing they first sighted was later positively identified as the SLA panel. It was unidentified for a while, but only for a while.

To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence.

Not attributed in any way, shape, or form. Nobody except the UFO enthusiasts believes anymore Aldrin was talking about anything but the SLA panel, including Aldrin.

It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.

Completely, totally false. NASA conclusively identified it as the SLA panel based on its trajectory.

Again why all the government interest?

Because during the Cold War the U.S. was understandably paranoid. At first they thought these sightings might have been of Soviet craft of some kind, such as recon drones or combat aircraft. Then they feared Soviets might use some gimmick to create a bunch of sightings that would tie up U.S. air defense while they launched an attack.

The government interest decades ago was simply to see whether these sightings could be tied to any known national security threat. In some cases that could be ruled out affirmatively, because upon serious investigation the real cause was discovered (usually mistaken identification of common phenomena). But the affirmative method is not required. That is, an investigation doesn't necessarily have to determine the actual root cause in order to rule out some other root cause whose ruling-out was the primary activity.

Nowadays, ironically, the criticism is that government isn't interested enough. UFO enthusiasts chalk this up to the government supposedly already having first-hand knowledge of space aliens, therefore no further public research is needed. It's more parsimoniously attributed to the prior interest having been satisfied, and no change in the observations warrants revisiting the conclusion.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 04:22 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,684
Default

Ever since the days of Kenneth Arnold, there has been no crystal-clear, smoking gun evidence that unidentified flying objects are alien spaceships. If there had been, this discussion would not be taking place.

An interesting case is the 2004 Mexican military flir ufo video case in Campeche. Initially unexplained and intriguing, Captain Franz and others showed convincingly that the images were caused by oil flares (just compare the oil flare photos with the video). However, if you search for information on ufo sites, on some the case is still being presented as unsolved. This, unfortunately often happens: something is initially mistakenly identified as an ufo by an astronaut, pilot, etc. and then when an explanation is found, the initial report is not rectified.

A question for impactstyle: what is the difference between being a skeptic and being a non-believer? I, for one, don't consider myself an skeptic. I just can't accept assertions without proof, so I do not believe the assertions. (P.S. your replies would make easier reading, if you broke them down into smaller paragraphs - thanks)
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 04:24 PM
impactstyles impactstyles is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
Not natural doesn't rule out artificial. Most people have detritus in their bodies. I carried a splinter for nearly 10 years, and I still have rocks in my knee from a spill I took when I was eight.

Dr. Robert Leir who has perfomed multiple surgeries removing these foreign objects has said some of the implants were biological and actually responded by "moving" when the attempt was made to remove them. He went on further to state that most of the foreign peices of metal removed have created nerve endings which, as humans, we still do not have the technology to accomplish.

...just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet.

Buzz Aldrin's alleged UFO has been covered at length. It hasn't been secret at all. It was a piece of the Saturn V rocket.

I apologize in advance again for not reading the other thread that talks about this...yet. But Buzz said during the interview he asked Houston how far away the rockets were at that time and they responded 6,000 miles, he then further states he knew this object was not 6,000 miles away but much closer.

To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence.

It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.

Completely, totally false. NASA conclusively identified it as the SLA panel based on its trajectory.

So you are now telling me that during this documentary, not only did they stretch the truth, but they flat out bold face lied to their viewers, we are not talking a little stretch here, we are talking a completely made up, fabricated, based on nothing at all, lie.


Again why all the government interest?

Because during the Cold War the U.S. was understandably paranoid. At first they thought these sightings might have been of Soviet craft of some kind, such as recon drones or combat aircraft. Then they feared Soviets might use some gimmick to create a bunch of sightings that would tie up U.S. air defense while they launched an attack.

The government interest decades ago was simply to see whether these sightings could be tied to any known national security threat. In some cases that could be ruled out affirmatively, because upon serious investigation the real cause was discovered (usually mistaken identification of common phenomena). But the affirmative method is not required. That is, an investigation doesn't necessarily have to determine the actual root cause in order to rule out some other root cause whose ruling-out was the primary activity.

Nowadays, ironically, the criticism is that government isn't interested enough. UFO enthusiasts chalk this up to the government supposedly already having first-hand knowledge of space aliens, therefore no further public research is needed. It's more parsimoniously attributed to the prior interest having been satisfied, and no change in the observations warrants revisiting the conclusion.

With some time and research I can provide links/articles/non fuzzy pics/non fuzzy videos that more than warrant revisting the conclusion.


Random question, have you all ever heard of hyperdiminsional physics?
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 04:42 PM
impactstyles impactstyles is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
Default

...And regarding the disclosure project, if it is the popular belief in this forum that everything is explained, and everything is misidentified, then what about the disclosure project? I can believe a few military people and a few airline pilots might have been three sheets to the wind one night and thought venus=ET, but not the hundreds of retired military high ranking officials, pilots, engineers, etc. Again even if 99% of their sightings are explained, what accounts for that 1%, THAT is where my questions lie. If these people thought for one second that there was an alternative, easy explanation for what they saw, then they would not risk everything to come forward and publicly admit what they are saying, and again we are not talking one or two guys here we are talking hundreds.
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 04:51 PM
gzhpcu's Avatar
gzhpcu gzhpcu is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 3,684
Default

In respect to your questions concerning Hoagland's hyperdimensional space and the disclosure project, I suggest you use the search function on this forum, and you will find both amply discussed.
__________________
______________________________________________
“He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever”
Chinese proverb
"All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 05:18 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: What happened to all the flying saucers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Dr. Robert Leir who has perfomed multiple surgeries removing these foreign objects has said some of the implants were biological and actually responded by "moving" when the attempt was made to remove them. He went on further to state that most of the foreign peices of metal removed have created nerve endings which, as humans, we still do not have the technology to accomplish.
Here are a few links re Dr. Lier, who is a podiatrist and, as shown by his web site, a "true believer" in abductions. The lab results show materials that are found on Earth. Metallurgically the state/structure of the materials indicate a probable origin in one case from a low-nickel iron meteorite and, in the other, an Earth-based rock. Nothing remotely biological here.

The New Mexico Tech info looks legit, it being an accredited science and engineering school. However the National Institute for Discovery Science is another matter entirely.

And of course, don't forget to visit the Alien Implant Research Online Store!
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 05:38 PM
impactstyles impactstyles is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maksutov View Post
Here are a few links re Dr. Lier, who is a podiatrist and, as shown by his web site, a "true believer" in abductions. The lab results show materials that are found on Earth. Metallurgically the state/structure of the materials indicate a probable origin in one case from a low-nickel iron meteorite and, in the other, an Earth-based rock. Nothing remotely biological here.

The New Mexico Tech info looks legit, it being an accredited science and engineering school. However the National Institute for Discovery Science is another matter entirely.

And of course, don't forget to visit the Alien Implant Research Online Store!


OK. After reading the link you provided, it shows nothing of revealing the origion of the implants. Additionally, understand what I am about to write is in no way spam or advertising.

My father is a happy retiree with an interest in this subject. He literally just had a phone interview with Dr Lier yesterday. The Dr explained these things to him and my dad will put the entire interview on his website for all to see. We are not talking about websites, research or what have you, we are talking straight form the horses mouth this time, and the Dr said that one implant was biological and the others created nerve endings, and we do not have the technology as humans to duplicate this. He also stated that the body never rejects these implants either which is kind of fishy. I will stop here because I am not advertising or spamming for his website.
Reply With Quote
  #171 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 05:46 PM
astrophotographer's Avatar
astrophotographer astrophotographer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 808
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
I can believe a few military people and a few airline pilots might have been three sheets to the wind one night and thought venus=ET, but not the hundreds of retired military high ranking officials, pilots, engineers, etc. Again even if 99% of their sightings are explained, what accounts for that 1%, THAT is where my questions lie. If these people thought for one second that there was an alternative, easy explanation for what they saw, then they would not risk everything to come forward and publicly admit what they are saying, and again we are not talking one or two guys here we are talking hundreds.
The problem is that these people don't realize they are mistaken at the time. Being a pilot, astronaut, or even housewife does not make one always right (although my wife would probably disagree). People of all trades make mistakes when they see something. Many of these people you are referring to are often telling their stories years later and memory can be a faulty thing. Others were convinced at the time of the incident that they saw something strange and extraordinary. This makes them unreliable simply because witnesses who are emotional often make mistakes in what they report. We could go through each case piece by piece but it will probably be a waste of time since you will always use the fall back position "but the witness reported this or the witness knew what he saw". Most of the high profile incidents have had alternative and more earthly explanations offered for them. Until something better than a few "UFO stories" by excited/emotional eyewitnesses can be presented, the more rational explanation will be accepted as the likely source.
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 06:36 PM
Halcyon Dayz's Avatar
Halcyon Dayz Halcyon Dayz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nederland - Sol III
Posts: 1,699
Red face Occam's Razor

Don't get us wrong.

Nobody here is saying that it is impossible that Earth is, or ever was, visited by an extraterrestrial sentient life-form.
It is however extremely unlikely for a number of reasons.

Since we know for a fact that a very large percentage of all UFO sightings were either misinterpretations of natural or man-made phenomena, or genuine hoaxes, then we must, in the absence of any hard evidence indicating otherwise, come to the parsimonious conclusion that it is more then likely that all remaining sightings fall in the same categories.

(I hope that that sentence didn't get to convoluted.)
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis
Join the Illuminati

Last edited by Halcyon Dayz; 12-December-2007 at 07:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 06:49 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,691
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
<snip>
Again even if 99% of their sightings are explained, what accounts for that 1%, THAT is where my questions lie.
Just to add on to what Halcyon Dayz said, that's why they are called UNIDENTIFIED Flying Objects. I can say that I have seen things in the sky that I wasn't sure what they were. But, it is a big leap to go from "I don't know what that is" to "It must be from another planet". Without hard evidence that is actually is from another planet, then it just has to stay unidentified.

In the two fields I work in (work as a chemist, volunteer as a nature guide), I have learned a very important leason, it is fine to say "I don't know". People do that in science all the time.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #174 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 06:51 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 16,733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by impactstyles View Post
Random question, have you all ever heard of hyperdiminsional physics?
Speaking of people who won't believe an explanation when the evidence is right in front of their eyes . . . .

By the way, I would like an apology for your assertion that I would betray my own beliefs.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #175 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 07:49 PM
Dave J Dave J is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 798
Default

http://www.nuforc.org/

What do you make of this event? (trick question...)
Reply With Quote
  #176 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 08:55 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,302
Default

With some time and research I can provide links/articles/non fuzzy pics/non fuzzy videos that more than warrant revisting the conclusion.

Keep in mind that "the conclusion" in this context is "UFO sightings do not indicate a threat to U.S. national security." To say, in contrast, that something -- anything -- does indicate a threat to U.S. national security is an affirmative statement with a burden of proof. So to warrant revisiting the conclusion, you have to satisfy a burden of proof. Unfortunately, "I dunno what I saw," does not even approach the burden, much less carry it.

The government studies I'm familiar with do not even attempt to answer the question whether UFO sightings represent alien spacecraft. That they did, or should have, is simply the spin put on them by UFO enthusiasts.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #177 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 09:09 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,302
Default

Dr. Lier is not credible. He has a vested interest in one interpretation. Further, he makes statements that are not supported by evidence nor the remainder of the medical community. One such statement is that there are no inflammatory responses around supposedly alien implants, and that normally-occurring debris should always exhibit one. That expectation is not medically true and is further counterindicated by my own experience. I believe Dr. Lier is overstating the defensibility of his interpretation of extracted items as medically anomalous.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #178 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 09:19 PM
HypothesisTesting HypothesisTesting is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: a small grain of dust
Posts: 302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by astrophotographer View Post
I am not so certain about this. Many amateurs are recording the ISS with little difficulty and in enough detail to identify it. Yes, I have plenty of satellite streaks in my photographs and all are very small but I use a digital SLR with a low focal length. Many amateurs using CCDs are imaging galaxies in very long focal lengths and with fine resolution. My guess is they could probably identify large satellites (about the size of a bus) if they passed the field of view. Of course, they would just be wide streaks and not show detail.

Then we have the survey's done by NEAT, LONEOS, LINEAR, etc. They are covering larger areas of the sky looking for fast moving asteroids (and sweeping up just about everything else in near earth orbit). I am sure any foreign object invading the earth environment would be imaged and identified. I believe there was one such object some time ago that was thought to be an old Saturn rocket stage that may have returned into earth orbit (although this was never confirmed and could be just a small asteroid).

The amount of sky monitored by these surveys have pretty much eliminated the comet discoveries by amateurs (not completely yet). It would seem these instruments would be able to detect any large objects in earth orbit or approaching earth orbit.
This is a good discussion, something I didn't think of before. If there are as many UFOs as the "flaps" imply, I agree that some good resolution images of UFOs would have shown up by now. The fact that such are not occuring is good further confirmation that UFOs are not alien craft (not to mention the many other reasons such as the total improbability of "them" travelling to "us" in this whole large universe.)

Even though Stan Friedman makes a good point that the Blue Book Special Report 14 has hundreds of credible reports, that by no means implies these are aliens being sighted. And even J. Allen Hynek's probability-strangeness doesn't really get us closer to good solid evidence. When I listen to Stan Friedman these days, he almost sounds naive even though he's been around forever.
__________________


'Just be a good team player in life', Andrew Evans
Reply With Quote
  #179 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 09:25 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 9,951
Default

Quote:
Government stooges? NO. I disagree that your are all crazy part.
I once shampooed my eyebrows, for which my father called me crazy. But I think everyone else here was a normal kid.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon.
I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear.

"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
Reply With Quote
  #180 (permalink)  
Old 12-December-2007, 10:27 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
But I think everyone else here was a normal kid.


Oh, God, that's funny. Comedy gold. Seriously, I'm wiping my eyes now.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
"The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying motorcycle, a new design danscope Science and Technology 59 28-March-2007 04:54 AM
Flying in a hydrogen atmosphere...speculation Romanus Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 17 29-November-2006 02:15 PM
100 years of flight Argos Off-Topic Babbling 19 08-November-2006 05:15 PM
Big bang was not happened suntrack2 Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers 12 20-September-2005 03:08 PM
What just happened here? N C More Off-Topic Babbling 17 09-September-2005 10:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today