|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello, impactstyles. Welcome (back) to the board. What was your previous handle?
No, I don't think you're crazy, but I do think you might want to switch to decaf for a while. I am not certain UFOs don't exist (as alien spacecraft). I don't think they do because the evidence is crummy. A series of fakes, misidentifications, anecdotes, and ambiguous and unrepeatable data. And I am looking at the big picture. Yes, I've worked in aerospace, and I've worked in the defense field, which gives me some insight into the nature of the claims and also into the behavior of the organizations you mention. I've also learned something about cultural reinforcement and groupthink and the malleability of memory in particular and subjective experience in general. I will become a believer in ET visits the instant I am shown hard evidence - not anecdotes, not unverifiable claims, not ambiguous data. Really - I want to believe it - it would be amazing to know the neighbors have already dropped in to visit.
__________________
"Slapping a guy on the head is just as funny now as it was eighty years ago." |
|
||||
|
No one could pay me enough to betray history. No one. You may not believe me, but it is absolutely true. If I believed that Apollo was a hoax, that Roswell was really an alien crash, that any of the other conspiracies were true, no one could possibly pay me enough to claim otherwise.
I don't believe we have been visited by alien spacecraft; it's certainly possible that we have and the evidence isn't there, but I don't believe it. This is, naturally, different from belief or lack thereof in the existence of extraterrestrial life; I do believe in that. Without evidence, admittedly, but I do believe in it. However, I see no reason to believe that alien civilizations have visited Earth without evidence. And, realistically, there isn't any. There are confused eyewitness reports that are generally explicable by known phenomena. There are fuzzy photographs, many of which are obvious fakes. However, I cannot fathom an alien civilization coming many, many lightyears, buzzing a few fields, and taking off again. I cannot fathom them being advanced enough to come that vast distance and being seen if they don't want to be. I cannot fathom them, in short, behaving the way they must be behaving if the UFO reports are, in fact, reports of alien spacecraft. It doesn't make any sense to me. I am not a government employee. I never have been. And I can assure you that my disability check is nowhere near enough money to get me to lie about anything, much less to betray history. It's simply ridiculous to me to assume that it is, and I find it one of the most offensive things that it is possible to suggest about me.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As an archeologist, the past is my passion and I would never lie about it. I would never want to cause ignorance to anyone, because spreading ignorance is to poison the mind. Money offered to me for that purpose would be fouler than used tissues.
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Bravo!!!! ![]() Atleast 90% |
|
||||
|
Which 90%? Do you believe we are being paid as government stooges? (and yes, that is a direct question, and I expect an answer - you know the rules)
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King) One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009 All moderation in purple |
|
||||
|
How is a number calculated with no facts to base it on?
__________________
Reality moves at the speed of light. If the text of this post is blue, it's a "Moderator comment". [ The RULES of the Forum ] [ Forum FAQs ] [ Conspiracy Theory advice ] [ Alternate Theory Advice ] To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team - use the /!\ icon at the top-right of the post. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
The "battle for LA" really had nothing to do with UFO investigations but if that is what you think, then feel free but there is plenty of good explanations for this event. As far as I know, following the event and once the military was satisified it was not an actual air attack, the matter was dropped and there was no further interest until....... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Lastly, one would think that if it were something really extraordinary, a picture or two would have been taken by all the people that supposedly handled it. There is not one photograph of any of this supposedly strange debris until it arrived at Fort Worth. What do these photographs show? Radar reflectors and balloon materials. Quote:
It was clear that at least a few reported incidents might have involved rare but significant phenomena such as electrical activity high above thunderstorms (e.g., sprites) or rare cases of radar ducting. On the other hand, the review panel was not convinced that any of the evidence involved currently unknown physical processes or pointed to the involvement of an extraterrestrial intelligence. These scientists had no prior interest in the subject and were exposed to only one side of the argument. Yet, they could not see anything in the data. All went back to their studies and did not suddenly find a need to study UFOs. This is not the first time this has happened since 1947. Each time a scientific panel looks at the subject, they all come to the same conclusion. That being that there is no need to think that anything extraordinary is happening. To me, that says a lot. |
|
||||
|
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis Join the Illuminati
|
|
|||
|
Hi everyone it is me again. Thank you for your thought provoking replies, much appreciated. Again I apologize if I came across as rude yesterday. I honestly do not remember my username from the 6 or 7 years ago, but I spent all of my time back then on the moon hoax conspiracy thread and photoshopped images of my little black dog on the lunar surface if anyone out there remembers those pics. Any who, the gentleman that answered my Roswell comments/questions makes a lot of sense, but I find something fishy about the entire story. The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it? Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about, but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet. There is the other gentleman, whose name escapes me now, who owns a piece of "something" that just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet. There are the Chinese dropa stones. Then there are all the stories throughout history. I know you are all well aware of the ancient astronaut theories. But I digress. I don't know how many of you get the science channel on your local cable service, and if you do I don’t know how many of you watched the special yesterday about the "lost" Apollo 11 moon tapes that were recently found and aired. During this special they interviewed a few of the "Houston" guys as well as a new interview with Buzz Aldrin. Here's the kicker if you did not watch it. Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it. They showed the video on the special, but they said it was footage of a later Apollo mission, yet it was the same UFO. Then Buzz goes on to talk about his experience with cosmic rays as he tried to go to sleep. Finally Buzz, and the narrator concurs that nobody "cared" about the ufo following alongside them because they were so caught up with trying to figure out the cosmic rays. But this is exactly what really upsets me. That is proof. Just because you can not touch it or see it today, that was proof with the darned astronaut admitting so, but then they just gloss over it and focus on the cosmic ray scenario. Kind of like how our current president tells us Bin Laden is no longer a concern and most of America is like "Oh, no concern anymore, OK" Meanwhile he is the MAN to get. It makes no sense. To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence. Yet the way it was presented, no one would think twice about it. It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon.
Sorry I am rambling on here but another thing I want to address to the skeptics out there is this. Again why all the government interest? I could understand a few reports to throw people (and Russia) off the trail of our black budget military ops, but for these reports to continue for years on end just does not make sense if the phenomena was fabricated or easily explained by "swamp gas" or "Venus". I anxiously await your replies. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
The skeptics among you who need hard evidence, there is hard evidence, the question is, do you believe it?
I don't think you understand what we mean by "hard" evidence. Of course there is no crashed saucer or alien body that we officially know about... There is no crashed saucer or alien body about which we know even unofficially. There is only rumor and supposition, just as there is rumor and supposition about the appearance of the Virgin Mary in a tree stump a few blocks from my house. but some abductees have had pieces of foreign metal removed from there body that was independently verified as metals not natural to this planet. Not natural doesn't rule out artificial. Most people have detritus in their bodies. I carried a splinter for nearly 10 years, and I still have rocks in my knee from a spill I took when I was eight. I've read dozens of biopsy claims, and none yet that describes something that cannot have been produced on Earth (e.g., industrial alloys, plastics, etc.) The reports say it's not "naturally occurring," but something doesn't have to be naturally occurring in order to wind up in our bodies. Man-made stuff winds up there too. For some reason, UFO enthusiasts inexplicably believe that if it didn't arise through some natural process, it must therefore be from some space culture. ...just fell from the sky one night and has been verified again to not be a meteor, asteroid, or anything from this planet. You mean "anything from this planet" that fell within the researcher's imagination. It is impossible to rule out Earth-bound causes completely. Such determinations simply rule out what the researchers believe to be likely candidate causes. There is a huge difference between, "This isn't any of the ten things I tested for," and "This is something from an alien culture and therefore proof that such a culture exists." Yet the UFO enthusiasts want us to believe the latter. None of what has been presented is what a scientist would term "hard evidence." What has been presented is a conclusion by default or presumption: it's presumed to be an alien artifact until proven otherwise. That's simply the fallacy of begging the question. Buzz openly admits that during his trip to the moon, they had a UFO follow them, and they have video of it. Buzz Aldrin's alleged UFO has been covered at length. It hasn't been secret at all. It was a piece of the Saturn V rocket. That is proof. No, it isn't. UFO enthusiasts simply tell only the part of the story they want to believe. They omit Aldrin's and others' later statements that the thing they first sighted was later positively identified as the SLA panel. It was unidentified for a while, but only for a while. To me Buzz Aldrin's words last night were an admission that this phenomenon is at least partly attributed to an extraterrestrial presence. Not attributed in any way, shape, or form. Nobody except the UFO enthusiasts believes anymore Aldrin was talking about anything but the SLA panel, including Aldrin. It was later admitted that to this day NASA still has no idea or admission to what this craft was that followed Apollo 11 to the moon. Completely, totally false. NASA conclusively identified it as the SLA panel based on its trajectory. Again why all the government interest? Because during the Cold War the U.S. was understandably paranoid. At first they thought these sightings might have been of Soviet craft of some kind, such as recon drones or combat aircraft. Then they feared Soviets might use some gimmick to create a bunch of sightings that would tie up U.S. air defense while they launched an attack. The government interest decades ago was simply to see whether these sightings could be tied to any known national security threat. In some cases that could be ruled out affirmatively, because upon serious investigation the real cause was discovered (usually mistaken identification of common phenomena). But the affirmative method is not required. That is, an investigation doesn't necessarily have to determine the actual root cause in order to rule out some other root cause whose ruling-out was the primary activity. Nowadays, ironically, the criticism is that government isn't interested enough. UFO enthusiasts chalk this up to the government supposedly already having first-hand knowledge of space aliens, therefore no further public research is needed. It's more parsimoniously attributed to the prior interest having been satisfied, and no change in the observations warrants revisiting the conclusion. |
|
||||
|
Ever since the days of Kenneth Arnold, there has been no crystal-clear, smoking gun evidence that unidentified flying objects are alien spaceships. If there had been, this discussion would not be taking place.
An interesting case is the 2004 Mexican military flir ufo video case in Campeche. Initially unexplained and intriguing, Captain Franz and others showed convincingly that the images were caused by oil flares (just compare the oil flare photos with the video). However, if you search for information on ufo sites, on some the case is still being presented as unsolved. This, unfortunately often happens: something is initially mistakenly identified as an ufo by an astronaut, pilot, etc. and then when an explanation is found, the initial report is not rectified. A question for impactstyle: what is the difference between being a skeptic and being a non-believer? I, for one, don't consider myself an skeptic. I just can't accept assertions without proof, so I do not believe the assertions. (P.S. your replies would make easier reading, if you broke them down into smaller paragraphs - thanks)
__________________
______________________________________________ “He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever” Chinese proverb "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
With some time and research I can provide links/articles/non fuzzy pics/non fuzzy videos that more than warrant revisting the conclusion. Random question, have you all ever heard of hyperdiminsional physics? |
|
|||
|
...And regarding the disclosure project, if it is the popular belief in this forum that everything is explained, and everything is misidentified, then what about the disclosure project? I can believe a few military people and a few airline pilots might have been three sheets to the wind one night and thought venus=ET, but not the hundreds of retired military high ranking officials, pilots, engineers, etc. Again even if 99% of their sightings are explained, what accounts for that 1%, THAT is where my questions lie. If these people thought for one second that there was an alternative, easy explanation for what they saw, then they would not risk everything to come forward and publicly admit what they are saying, and again we are not talking one or two guys here we are talking hundreds.
|
|
||||
|
In respect to your questions concerning Hoagland's hyperdimensional space and the disclosure project, I suggest you use the search function on this forum, and you will find both amply discussed.
__________________
______________________________________________ “He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever” Chinese proverb "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence - and then success is sure." - Mark Twain. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The New Mexico Tech info looks legit, it being an accredited science and engineering school. However the National Institute for Discovery Science is another matter entirely. And of course, don't forget to visit the Alien Implant Research Online Store!
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
OK. After reading the link you provided, it shows nothing of revealing the origion of the implants. Additionally, understand what I am about to write is in no way spam or advertising. My father is a happy retiree with an interest in this subject. He literally just had a phone interview with Dr Lier yesterday. The Dr explained these things to him and my dad will put the entire interview on his website for all to see. We are not talking about websites, research or what have you, we are talking straight form the horses mouth this time, and the Dr said that one implant was biological and the others created nerve endings, and we do not have the technology as humans to duplicate this. He also stated that the body never rejects these implants either which is kind of fishy. I will stop here because I am not advertising or spamming for his website. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Don't get us wrong.
Nobody here is saying that it is impossible that Earth is, or ever was, visited by an extraterrestrial sentient life-form. It is however extremely unlikely for a number of reasons. Since we know for a fact that a very large percentage of all UFO sightings were either misinterpretations of natural or man-made phenomena, or genuine hoaxes, then we must, in the absence of any hard evidence indicating otherwise, come to the parsimonious conclusion that it is more then likely that all remaining sightings fall in the same categories. (I hope that that sentence didn't get to convoluted.)
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis Join the Illuminati
Last edited by Halcyon Dayz; 12-December-2007 at 07:35 PM.. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
In the two fields I work in (work as a chemist, volunteer as a nature guide), I have learned a very important leason, it is fine to say "I don't know". People do that in science all the time.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King) One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009 All moderation in purple |
|
||||
|
Quote:
By the way, I would like an apology for your assertion that I would betray my own beliefs.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
|||
|
|
|
||||
|
With some time and research I can provide links/articles/non fuzzy pics/non fuzzy videos that more than warrant revisting the conclusion.
Keep in mind that "the conclusion" in this context is "UFO sightings do not indicate a threat to U.S. national security." To say, in contrast, that something -- anything -- does indicate a threat to U.S. national security is an affirmative statement with a burden of proof. So to warrant revisiting the conclusion, you have to satisfy a burden of proof. Unfortunately, "I dunno what I saw," does not even approach the burden, much less carry it. The government studies I'm familiar with do not even attempt to answer the question whether UFO sightings represent alien spacecraft. That they did, or should have, is simply the spin put on them by UFO enthusiasts. |
|
||||
|
Dr. Lier is not credible. He has a vested interest in one interpretation. Further, he makes statements that are not supported by evidence nor the remainder of the medical community. One such statement is that there are no inflammatory responses around supposedly alien implants, and that normally-occurring debris should always exhibit one. That expectation is not medically true and is further counterindicated by my own experience. I believe Dr. Lier is overstating the defensibility of his interpretation of extracted items as medically anomalous.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Even though Stan Friedman makes a good point that the Blue Book Special Report 14 has hundreds of credible reports, that by no means implies these are aliens being sighted. And even J. Allen Hynek's probability-strangeness doesn't really get us closer to good solid evidence. When I listen to Stan Friedman these days, he almost sounds naive even though he's been around forever.
__________________
'Just be a good team player in life', Andrew Evans |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I want to go back to the moon. I don't care which rocket you use, whichever one you pick, I'll like it, I swear. "If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis Rovers forever! - ToSeek |
|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Oh, God, that's funny. Comedy gold. Seriously, I'm wiping my eyes now.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flying motorcycle, a new design | danscope | Science and Technology | 59 | 28-March-2007 04:54 AM |
| Flying in a hydrogen atmosphere...speculation | Romanus | Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers | 17 | 29-November-2006 02:15 PM |
| 100 years of flight | Argos | Off-Topic Babbling | 19 | 08-November-2006 05:15 PM |
| Big bang was not happened | suntrack2 | Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers | 12 | 20-September-2005 03:08 PM |
| What just happened here? | N C More | Off-Topic Babbling | 17 | 09-September-2005 10:32 AM |