I think the poster was confusing style of debate with conclusions reached; aka he thought Trodas was being lumped in with some group of "People who don't believe what we believe," rather than identified as "Oh, we've seen THIS syle of argument before!"

__________________
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

Thanks for that, nomuse.

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

Hi Paul,

Personally, I didn't find it questionable, but I know there are those who do (like jdavisabc, apparantly). I don't know if "ironic" is the right word for how I meant it, but I hope you understand my intent. I really meant questionable by jdavisabc.

CJSF

__________________
Two years ago moved from my town
I was looking up past the city lights
But the city lights got in my way

See the constellation ride across the sky
No cigar, no lady on his arm
Just a guy made of dots and lines

-from "See The Constellation"
by They Might Be Giants

Thanks, Christopher. I understand what you mean. As long as people like you don't have a problem with it, I'm happy!

__________________
Nothing beautiful was ever made from gravel.

People like me enjoy your posts Paul.

__________________
All Moderation in Purple
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
◄Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ►

Surely the Japanese survey would show all the vehicles left by NASA????

Actually it is the Indian survey mission which has photographed the NASA equipment left on the Moon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandra..._landing_sites

__________________
New Orion's Arm Site . The Starlark . Against a Diamond Sky (OA Novella Collection) . OA Flickr set

That would depend on two three FOUR things.

1. Did the Japanese satellite (SELENE it was?) actually fly over the Apollo mission sites?
2. Did any of the satellite's cameras have a sufficient resolution to capture any of the sites, if the satellite flew over?
3. (Related to 2) Did the satellite fly at a sufficiently low altitude to allow the camera to see any of the mission sites, if the satellite flew over?
4. Were any of the satellite's cameras that could do it if they were close enough etc, actually pointed towards the sites to make a photograph at the right time?

__________________
Spread the Love!

By the way Poetscornersociety, welcome to BAUT.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

Kaguya. It was renamed after launch, SELENE was the earlier name. Maybe they want to keep it for a proper AI moon lander.

__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
Meet the OOONG TOE.

Just looking at one of these:

The published aerial resolution of the Kaguya Terrain Camera was only 10 meters. Not good enough to resolve hardware left behind from the Apollo missions.

__________________
I can't WAIT for January 1, 2013 to arrive! Then again, I'm still waiting for October 1, 1993 ...

You'd better BET there's a spoon, Neo! THWACK!!!!