A friend and I are having a debate about our year vs mayan calendar.

He says we are really now in 2012 because out cal is 5 years off according to the birth of christ. He gave me links with his approach. I do not know enough about mayan/greorian to debunk him, can anyone clear this up for me.

Thank You

http://www.tprconline.com/index.php?topic=27238.10;wap2
Post made on Quote from: McAirman on August 30, 2007, 12:11:18 AM

also this site

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread268417/pg1

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

Calandars are very arbitrary things, as far as years go. It just depends on what point you want to start counting from. Even if the Mayan calander started five years earlier, that's an arbitrary date aswell.

Our calandar year is based off a religious belief, but you could just as easily base it off of the date of the oldest known human remains, or the first time a peanut butter and jelly sandwhich was made.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

"The year we live in" is quite relative. It depends on which calendar you use.

__________________
Spread the Love!

I may have not explained myself well enough.

What I mean is he says that we are now in the year 2012 which is the end of the mayan calendar.

Which means that 2012 really equals 2007 which is now

Sorry I wasnt clear

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

This is the 44th year of the Argosian Epoch.

__________________
What brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart

Yeah, I got that. Sorry, mine was more a random observation than an answer; I don't know how the two systems compair. Tel him to stock up on extra canned goods and bottled water just in case.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

No problem.

The Mayan's didn't use the birth of Christ to set up their calendar, so when it was encountered by Europeans, it was correlated with the European calendar¹. So, the start corresponds to our Gregorian August 11, 3114 BC. If the Gregorian calendar is off and we have to add five years to all dates, then we are "really" at 2012, but the Mayan calendar "ends" (actually, restarts) five years later too, in 2017.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoame...Count_calendar

A foul epoch if there ever was one.

Hi hhEb09'1

I got your point on this, but if the mayan calendar ends in 2012 and not 2017 and if 2007 is really 2012 then the mayan calendar ends this year. Right

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

Oh oh oh! I think I can use some deductive reasoning to answer your question, however. I don't believe the Mayans numbered their years, like our current date system. In otherwords, I don't think the tribesmemberes dated their checks, 114th of Autunmous, 1601.

The Mayan calander is simply a record of patterns related to the earth's movement, which can be translated to days. Therefore, when it's said that the Mayan calander ends in 2012, they mean that the record of days runs out in what would be our 2012.

Or to put it another way, the calander was said to end in 2012 by the person or persons who translated it in terms of their calander, the Gregorian calender.

So to answer your question, the end of the Mayan calander is (most likely, IMHO) still in OUR 2012.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

No, if this is really 2012, then the mayan calendar ends in 2017. If this is 2007, then the mayan calendar ends in 2012. Either way, it's five years out.

I still feel like I'm still living in 1972 myself.

Oh, the gadgets are better--wait a minute--my old rotary phone sounds better than any cell phone.

Scratch that. Other than the web, not much has changed.

Ok so if it is that simple where do the two threads that I posted get there reasoning for saying it is really 2012 now

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

That, and the price of a coffee

What threads? And whos reasoning? It's hard to tell where anyone gets their reasoning, or even if they're using reason (and for the record, "I saw it on the 'net" is not reasoning).

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

I didnt say it was actual reasoning I said there reasoning. For example that if christ was really born 5 years earlier, then our calendar is 5 years off, but if the mayans did not believe in god then there calendar would be accurate which would make our 2007 there 2012. atleast that is what I understood from my links I gave.

Or am I just confused on all this.

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

seeing as the Mayan calander was found and translated (or described) in terms of Gergorian years well after the birth or death of christ, I don't see how it would make a difference one way or the other if we were off five years. Their calender is not based off him; what are the chances that their calander was also then started within 5 years of his birth? They just happened to start keeping track of years arround that same time? What were they basing their start of the year on?

I'd still say it's pretty safe to assume that when it's understood that the Mayan calendar runs out in 2012, that's OUR 2012 being used to describe that.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

Ok now i think that i am not grasping the concept

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

Let me see if I can word it correctly.

AFAIK, the Mayan calendar years were not numbered 0 (or 1) to 2012. The Mayan calandar was a set of divisions that accurately accounted for days and years based on the earth's orbit around the sun (like the Gregorian calender we use today).

For all I know, the start of each Mayan year might have been April 23rd on our calendars. I don't know how the years were broken down other than by number of days. But it's not important, because we don't talk about the Mayan calendar in terms of Mayan dates. We talk about the Mayan calendar in terms of Gergorian dates.

The year that Christ was born compared to the year we based our calendar on has no bearing on how we describe the calendar in our terms.

Another way to look at it is this: when they looked at the calander, instead of thinking in terms of years, think in terms of days. They didn't just look at the calendar and say, "It says it stops in 2012". They said "There's 1000 days left on this calender. In 1000 days it will be 2012. This calendar ends in 2012" (obviously it was more than 1000). It really doesn't matter when we started counting years on our calender, the Mayan calender ends 1000 days later relative to ours. So unless our calender changes sometimes between when we discover it and when it ends, the result will always be the same.

Ergo, the Mayan calendar ends in OUR year 2012.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

Actually, that is not quite right (or I don't understand your point). The Mayans most definitely counted years (and days too). If a ruler fought a battle 12 years and 63 days after the start of his reign, it was the same 12 years and 63 days in the Mayan calendar as ours. They even took care of leap years, though they did it slightly differently than we do. The wikipedia article isn't a bad starting point. There is a very detailed, technical discussion here (Word document).

But the key question from bmpbmp is how to align the two calendars. I know we have talked about this before and I even posted some links. I'm going to be somewhat lazy and not search them out again, but they are somewhere in the forum. I did find this explanation of the correlation. From the linked article:
There is A TON of more information about the difficulties of the correlation on the website.

@bmpbmp - I don't mean this in a rude way, but So What. There is absolutely no reason to believe that the Mayans had any particular insight into the end of the world and there is no particular reason to think that the Mayans thought anything more of the end of a Calendar Round then we did of the year 2000. Other than the potential (unfullfilled) of computer problems, the world didn't end in 2000 either. I don't see why it matters.

__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple

When I first saw this thread, I was hoping that there might be an excuse to get some of the 2012=doom silliness out of the way for this year. But, it looks like we'll have to wait through 2012 before this goes away.

A question though: Are any prominent groups thinking of ways to push this past 2012? As in: "No, it isn't really 2012 when bad stuff is supposed to happen, it's 2015 (or 16 or 17)."

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

So Swift and Van what you are trying to say then is that we are now (2007) living in the mayan 2012 year then

__________________
Don't Hate Me Cause I Am Dum

Congratulations. This topic satisifes my flimsy criteria to be included in this list:

2003 no, 2012 si
2012
Pole shift / Planetary alignment 2012?
2012 alignment question
about the Mayan 2012 item
2012 Debunking?
Possible asteroid impact in 2012?
2012 asteroid?
We don't have to worry about 2012!
More on 2012 from India Daily
2012 Completion of conspiracy?
Here's what's REALLY going to happen in 2012...
crop circles, Planet X and 2012
Planet X, crop circles and 2012 cataclysma
According to the Mayans, what will happen on 23rd Dec. 2012?
More 2012 Nonsense
NEO 2012?
Dangerous NEO in 2012?
Christmas 2012
2012 mayan calender end of world
Regarding the supposed polar shift/new ice age in 2012
New 2012 threat?
2012 look at this thing on the sun
Russian Expert Predicts Global Cooling from 2012
Pole shift idea origins
Dec 20 2012
2012 Stuff
Horizon Project-New End of World Scare?
Date: December 21st 2012
Earth passing thru Galactic center in 2012 - didn't that already happen?
2012: What do you think well happen (if anything)
So what will we see in 2012?
Galactic Tsunami?
Plane of the ecliptic of the galaxy?
Earth's Magnetic Field & 2012
2012?
Any truth to this?
How can the sun be aligned with Galactic centre?
the whole 2012 poles flip nonsense
Planet X Official Advertisement
What year are we in

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Aren't we also in the year AE62? (Atomic Era)

What about LF38? (Lunar Footprint era)

Or IA30?(Interstellar Age - 1977 being the year Voyager 1 was launched on it's journey to interstellar space and is still operational ... just!) (P.S. I know Pioneer was launched earlier - late 60's?? - but for me true interstellar travel was achieved by Voyager as it is still working even now ... I think!)

__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....

Swift: any calender is counting years, that's what a calendar does. What I meant was simply that the mayan calandar (AFIAK) doesn't end in the mayan calander year 2012, but that it ends in our Georgian Calandar year 2012.

That was based off the assumption that out of all these people claiming the world will end in 2012 based on the Mayan calendar, at least one of them would have been smart enough to realize that the Mayan 2012 is different than the Georgian 2012...

...but I will admit that's not necessarily a safe assumption.

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."

I'm saying that it is irrelevant. I'm saying it would be nice if the folks that have managed to get themselves worried over a funny interpretation of an old calendar system had an excuse to give it up now, rather than continue on about it for several more years.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Even the Gregorian calendar is only based on a rough estimate of the birth of Jesus and is probably off by four to twelve years. The western dating system was created in the sixth century by a monk, Dennis the Diminutive, whose main goal was trying to determine a formula for the date of Easter. His estimate for Jesus' birth has to be at least four years too late because it is known that King Herod died in 4 BCE. It could be twelve years late if one considers the possibility that the star of Bethlehem was really a close approach of Halley's Comet, which is known to have occurred in 11 BCE. And with no "zero year" between 1 BCE and 1 CE it is forever mathematically incorrect, which is why the question of whether centuries start in the years 00 or 01 can never be answered.

I still say it's the year 65,000,000 AEE (After Extiction Event)...

Or ALMEE (After Last Major Extinction Event)

__________________
WANTED:

Schroedinger's Cat

Dead And Alive

Or year 5 BEOW (Before End Of World).

__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base