|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Phil gives some reasons here. One big reason is that Hoagland won't stay shut up. He'd be back on C2C the next week complaining about Phil's tactics (like using actual science and facts
) or even claiming victory.Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time." -- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684 |
|
||||
|
Off-Topic Babbling: "Phil VS Hoagland..!??" April 2
Conspiracy Theories: "Hoagland VS Phil??" March 6 Hazzard, How many more times are you going to start a topic asking this question?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0.... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
ToSeek BAUT Forum Moderator
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling. |
|
|||
|
I remember years ago, when Hoagland used to have a free blog on his website. The problem was so many of his critics kept scoring solid hits by explaining the weakness of his "version" of science, that he was forced to go with a pay/membership blog so that only the true believers would be willing to stay.
Kinda does a good job to silence those pesky skeptics! Perhaps Hoagland should be in politics... |