Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121 (permalink)  
Old 18-February-2005, 11:54 AM
JimTKirk's Avatar
JimTKirk JimTKirk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 720
Default Re: Back Drops The Size Of A Football Field hahahaha

Quote:
Originally Posted by unclejim
...Sorry Boys, things are just bigger in TX.
...
Hmmm... Tell that to AK!
__________________
Hanlon's Razor - "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Asimov's addition - "Or ignorance."

"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."
-- Charles Babbage
Reply With Quote
  #122 (permalink)  
Old 18-February-2005, 10:05 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,000
Default

He seems to have more comments on the page now. He has circled some areas on a cropped closeup of a particular lunar surface image and apparently seems to think it looks similar to the cloth in the picture of that tank/worksite. He seems to be assuming a cloth background for the moon mission. Quite a stretch ...

I don't see any information on the lunar image at all (a jpeg, naturally) so no source to compare it to. In the cropped image on my monitor, there just isn't enough definition for me to see much of anything, but in the primary lunar image on his page, there are obvious effects on the optics from sunlight reflections. I'm sure there would be dust on the optics as well.

Yup, those pictures convince me ... :roll:
Reply With Quote
  #123 (permalink)  
Old 18-February-2005, 11:25 PM
Daryl71 Daryl71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 244
Default

You know, I just mentioned "badly compressed JPG images as proof" in my debunking thread a couple days back.
Irony. #-o
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today