Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 07-May-2009, 10:57 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 12,138
Default

I'm just guessing, but I suspect TRUTHisnotfacts is one of the younger posters here, and that might be the reason for the style of the posts.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 06:01 AM
Christopher Ferro's Avatar
Christopher Ferro Christopher Ferro is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Space Coast
Posts: 1,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
I finally got it, but it "cost" me a year.


There was a joke?

CJSF
__________________
Two years ago moved from my town
I was looking up past the city lights
But the city lights got in my way

See the constellation ride across the sky
No cigar, no lady on his arm
Just a guy made of dots and lines

-from "See The Constellation"
by They Might Be Giants
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 04:32 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,692
Default

The BA has picked up the story in his blog.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 04:36 PM
Jason_Roberts's Avatar
Jason_Roberts Jason_Roberts is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United States (South Dakota)
Posts: 254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Ferro View Post


There was a joke?

CJSF
"Don't laugh. This is science." - James Randi
__________________
I am a cryptozoologist.
I search for hidden zoologists.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 09:09 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift View Post
The BA has picked up the story in his blog.
Quote:
Incredibly, some of the Google links are from social networks where people are actually taking the claim seriously enough to wonder about it. To them I say: come over to my house. Let’s play poker.
TRUTHisnotfacts, you like card games?
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 09:31 PM
peter eldergill peter eldergill is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,746
Default

01101001

Heh..I thought you were quoting TRUTHisnotfacts and so when I read Phil's blog I thought TRUTH was plagiarizing

Pete
__________________
PJE

There's so much I don't know about astrophysics. I wish I had read that book by that wheelchair guy.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2009, 09:35 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,118
Default

You can play games with credit cards??

.
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 08:03 AM
Extracelestial's Avatar
Extracelestial Extracelestial is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 130
Default

FYI:

Erich von Däniken is Swiss not Dutch. He isn't exactly what I'd call a fraud as he didn't make things up but interpreted evidence in a - well - biased fashion. But to speak on his behalf: he did make several expeditions to investigate his own claims and withdrew some of the wildest ones later.
In my youth his books were fun to read because I was already infected by the spacefaring virus and I didn't care whether the rockets came from Alabama, Kapustin Jar or Alpha Centauri.

Extracelestial
__________________
Science is not a monument of received Truth but something that people do to look for truth. - Dennis Overbye
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 12:29 PM
TRUTHisnotfacts TRUTHisnotfacts is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 245
Default

I agree with the people on here ...

what I do not understand is this ?

If the object was found by Apollo 11 then how come NASA sent Apollo 12 so many miles away from the site that that this object at ?

If I was NASA and I found this object I would have sent all the Apollo 11 12 13 14 15 all to the same location ...Then later on they could have sent them other places after they had went over the landing area of 11 real good to find everything that was there in area and on the dust .

final answer .........

If they found this object with 11 why not send 12 back there ?
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 12:48 PM
slang's Avatar
slang slang is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
If the object was found by Apollo 11 then how come NASA sent Apollo 12 so many miles away from the site that that this object at ?
That's a good point. If indeed Apollo 11 had found evidence of settlement, it would make sense to study that location more, much more. However, I'm not sure that all the moon rocks brought back by Apollo 11 had been studied by the time that Apollo 17 launched. The hoaxer could argue that the rock was only "opened up" recently. (I have not bothered reading the hoax article.. maybe there is something in there to counter my point).
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
Meet the OOONG TOE.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 12:49 PM
Paul Beardsley's Avatar
Paul Beardsley Paul Beardsley is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Havant, England
Posts: 4,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
I agree with the people on here ...

what I do not understand is this ?

If the object was found by Apollo 11 then how come NASA sent Apollo 12 so many miles away from the site that that this object at ?

If I was NASA and I found this object I would have sent all the Apollo 11 12 13 14 15 all to the same location ...Then later on they could have sent them other places after they had went over the landing area of 11 real good to find everything that was there in area and on the dust ...but they did not sent 12 there so that is a interesting finding to say the least ...if they found this object with 11 why not send 12 back there ?
I do hope nobody is baited by this farcical post.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 12:51 PM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 2,234
Default

What you do not understand is that this story is a complete fabrication, published by a "news" source that has a long track record of publishing similar sensational-sounding and completely untrue stories.

Apollo 11 found no such artifact. If it had, the find would have been trumpeted from the rooftops and NASA would have more funding than it would know what to do with.

Your continued credulity on this and other subjects is becoming tiresome.

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 12:57 PM
slang's Avatar
slang slang is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
I do hope nobody is baited by this farcical post.
Now now, at least it showed a little more critical thinking this time
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
Meet the OOONG TOE.
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 01:50 PM
Halcyon Dayz's Avatar
Halcyon Dayz Halcyon Dayz is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nederland - Sol III
Posts: 1,699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Extracelestial View Post
Erich von Däniken is Swiss not Dutch.
Just as well. We already have plenty of cranks of our own as it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Extracelestial View Post
He isn't exactly what I'd call a fraud...
A criminal court did call him just that.
He is not a very trustworthy man.

He doesn't just spin the facts, he has no compunction about lying by omission.
He must have known that a lot of his claims were untrue.
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis
Join the Illuminati
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 02:58 PM
Starfury Starfury is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
I agree with the people on here ...

what I do not understand is this ?

If the object was found by Apollo 11 then how come NASA sent Apollo 12 so many miles away from the site that that this object at ?

If I was NASA and I found this object I would have sent all the Apollo 11 12 13 14 15 all to the same location ...Then later on they could have sent them other places after they had went over the landing area of 11 real good to find everything that was there in area and on the dust .

final answer .........

If they found this object with 11 why not send 12 back there ?
A. There is no such object. That article is from the Weekly World News, whose writers and editors wouldn't know the truth if it sat in their laps and called them "Mama". Nothing written in that rag has ever been the least bit true.

B. If you want to learn about the moon, landing in the same spot over and over makes absolutely no sense. You need samples from different regions of the Moon to really learn about it.

@Paul Beardsley - I agree with you about the farcical nature of this post. However, I felt the need to try to set the poster straight about where the article came from. Probably an exercise in futility on my part though.

Last edited by Starfury; 09-May-2009 at 03:02 PM.. Reason: waffling
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 03:17 PM
TRUTHisnotfacts TRUTHisnotfacts is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 245
Thumbs down

I did not say NASA should have sent every Mission to the same location ..

I said if they found ? this Subject of talk why did Nasa not sent Apollo 12 ?

after reading and then looking at all of your updates of post ...

This is my final statement about this ...

NASA OF THE 80S .... was very high tech but so they would have sent other Apollos if this was found ...but they did not ..question is how come ?

There is not any facts that say it is ... I will stay with history on this one and say its not real ...that is where my data shows me ...truth may not be correct but facts to me is saying in my head that its not real looking at the other years after this rock was found ...
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 05:23 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,446
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
If they found this object with 11 why not send 12 back there ?
By jove...I think he's got it...

The reason they didn't send A12 there is because A11 did not find any "object".

Simple, huh?
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 05:43 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,118
Default

It's just a different think of waying the thing same, all's that.

-- Minneapolis, around Jeff
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 07:24 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 16,737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starfury View Post
A. There is no such object. That article is from the Weekly World News, whose writers and editors wouldn't know the truth if it sat in their laps and called them "Mama". Nothing written in that rag has ever been the least bit true.
This is not quite fair. They were (alas, no more!) perfectly aware that what they printed wasn't true. When I was in high school, the LA Times printed an article about them in one of the not-news sections. Oh, they freely admitted they were making things up, and they were genuinely concerned that other people might take what they wrote as fact. On the other hand, everyone I've ever known who's actually bought a copy has done so as a joke--I had a friend who considered a subscription--so it just seems that articles released from the bonds of the Paper get taken seriously.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2009, 08:55 PM
robross's Avatar
robross robross is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUTHisnotfacts View Post
...truth may not be correct but facts to me is saying in my head that its not real looking at the other years after this rock was found ...
If you are hearing voices in your head telling you things, you might want to go see a doctor about that.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2009, 09:51 AM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,118
Default

Nah, facts talk to people inside their heads. That's just a goofy fact about
facts. Of course, it still pays to be skeptical about what those facts seem
to be saying. Facts can be sneaky little devils.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2009, 10:00 AM
slang's Avatar
slang slang is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Root View Post
Facts can be sneaky little devils.
Stubborn too, or so I've heard.
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
Meet the OOONG TOE.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 01:26 AM
SpecialEd SpecialEd is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default

Look, I'm not an engineer like a lot of you guys (I'm in construction) but even I knew enough to see that It was hoeey. Aside from cracking up when I saw the picture, I mean.

For one, they said the drawing is made from an iron compound "found only in the highlands of the moon." How would we know that? We've never been to the highlands of the moon.

Also that "chemical analysis dates the drawing at 200,000 years." What chemical analysis is that? You can't carbon date iron.

I have to agree that given the consistency of the kind of questions or claims TINF comes up with, I suspect he's just having a little fun. Which is fine if we remember to do the same & not get too wound up about it.
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 01:49 AM
LaurelHS LaurelHS is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialEd View Post
We've never been to the highlands of the moon.
I thought Apollo 14 and 16 and 17 did visit the highlands of the Moon.
__________________
"One does not require alien ruins in order to absorb a profound sense of wonder and mystery from the moon. That our civilization had actually visited it is miracle enough." Jason Roberts

Last edited by LaurelHS; 13-May-2009 at 01:57 AM.. Reason: I forgot 17
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 01:54 AM
SpecialEd SpecialEd is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurelHS View Post
I thought Apollo 14 and 16 did visit the highlands of the Moon.
oh.
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 04:15 AM
Cavorite's Avatar
Cavorite Cavorite is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialEd View Post
Also that "chemical analysis dates the drawing at 200,000 years." What chemical analysis is that? You can't carbon date iron.
Actually, sometimes you can. Cast iron can contain up to 4% carbon. If the iron was smelted with charcoal, that makes it potentially datable. If it was fired with coke, you're out of luck.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 08:39 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurelHS View Post
I thought Apollo 14 and 16 and 17 did visit the highlands of the Moon.
A14 landed in the Fra Mauro highlands that were to have been A13's landing spot. A16 landed in the Descartes highlands.

A17 landed at the Taurus-Littrow valley.
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 13-May-2009, 05:10 PM
LaurelHS LaurelHS is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 791
Default

The ALSJ describes the landing site as "Taurus-Littrow, highlands and valley area."
__________________
"One does not require alien ruins in order to absorb a profound sense of wonder and mystery from the moon. That our civilization had actually visited it is miracle enough." Jason Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 14-May-2009, 06:01 AM
AGN Fuel's Avatar
AGN Fuel AGN Fuel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The beautiful Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurelHS View Post
The ALSJ describes the landing site as "Taurus-Littrow, highlands and valley area."
They must have had a geologist on board if they couldn't settle for one or the other...
__________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day." - Douglas Adams

"Certainly, in the topsy-turvy world of heavy rock, having a good solid piece of wood in your hand is often useful." - Ian Faith
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 14-May-2009, 04:41 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,302
Default

"Highlands" is a broader term designating -- for lack of a simpler explanation -- the white parts of the lunar surface as seen from Earth. It's basically anything that's not a mare. Maria make easier landing sites due both to orbital inclination and terrain. With increasing proficiency in piloting comes the ability to land in more far-flung areas of the Moon, and among rougher terrain. The J-mission landing profile was steeper and faster and require more from both pilot and machine to make a safe landing. Hence the highlands exploration came later in the program.
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stanley Kubrick and the lunar landings AstroMike Conspiracy Theories 78 14-October-2009 01:16 PM
October 2006 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 0 01-October-2006 03:05 PM
October 2004 AstroCalendar Dave Mitsky Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories 0 05-October-2004 08:31 AM
Why does the moon appear closer? Verlan J. Kliewer Against the Mainstream 1 23-October-2002 03:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today