|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
@ RobDegraves, Yes I know that the Mayan's never predicted the end of the world and if you read the whole thread you can see that I never say that I think that they did. But thank you anyway for the post.
As i recall Mckenna got most of hes parts to his theories from Out Of Body Experience's and therefore they are'nt worth to trust. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King) One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009 All moderation in purple |
|
||||
|
Well, except the reason so many people claim it's all going to happen in 2012 has to do with the Mayan calendar, even if they never mention it. That's why it's the year they reference. You'll note it's always 2012, and there's never a reason given that isn't either Nostradamus or the Mayans--and if it's Nostradamus, the Mayans usually come in somewhere anyway.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
||||
|
Well, he said himself that he developed a lot of his ideas while taking psychedelic drugs. I don't take his interpretations of his drug trips very seriously.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong? Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability. The Leif Ericson Cruiser |
|
||||
|
Certain musicians of the 1960s may have also written many things under the influence of psychedelic drugs (allegedly) but accurate predictions of future cataclysmic events weren't among them.
__________________
Dave Anyone seen my marbles? Anyone ... ? |
|
||||
|
Hallucinations and psychedelic trips are pretty much perpendicular to seeing the actual world and stating facts. Sure, perhaps you may be "enlightened" in some way or another a few times, but it mostly results in you getting more creative: e.g. certain musicians of the 1960s. Now creativity isn't a bad thing, but being creative with your perception doesn't make what you think you see any more true.
![]()
__________________
Spread the Love! |
|
||||
|
Put it this way--I wouldn't post every idea I had in the grips of full-fledged mania, either. You need a filter. The issue, to me, is not the validity of the mechanism--which I don't think is completely valid, and certainly not "medical"--but the quality of the filter. I can guarantee you that those much-vaunted drug-addled artists (not just of the '60s, either, even if we're including the 1860s) produced a lot of stuff that wasn't worth a thing. The filter's the important bit here, and it doesn't seem to be very effective in this case.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
|||
|
Quote:
'All Elephants are gray, but not all gray things are elephants.' Dr Sheldon Cooper, Big Bang Theory I have had that quote in my head for some time just looking for somewhere to drop it. Sorry for the late post, just saw the thread. It has been weeks since I last browsed.
__________________
"If they put me on a postage stamp tell them to use the young Bender" --Bender |
|
|||
|
Okey so I debunked that text for my class mate and then he sends me this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tLPJ9KdbzQ&feature=fvw .
One more thing that scares me is that history channel and fox are doing show about this stuff, when something like the end of the world theorys goes out in to public televison peapole will take it seriosly. And that is one other thing that scares me, if channels like the history channel makes show about it, then there might be some thing to this? Other wise wy would the history channel make shows about it? ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
It gets viewers. |
|
|||
|
And money. :P
sorry for that panic frase ''And that is one other thing that scares me, if channels like the history channel makes show about it, then there might be some thing to this? Other wise wy would the history channel make shows about it?'' I am angry at the history channel, cuse they make shows about peapoles deepest fears and tell them that is is true. When I saw one of the programs the said that the '' I ching'' was a doomsday profetsy. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Learning Channel and the History Channel (FoX never was any good) have both gone this route. I stopped watching both a long time ago... |
|
|||
|
Sorry to ask again but there is still one more thing that bugs me, and that is the claim that the universe will reset to the time of it's creation. I dont know if I sould belive it or not please explain wy it is wrong ( if it is)
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If somebody is going to say something as huge as the universe resetting itself will happen, he or she will need to provide some huge evidence to show that it will actually happen.
__________________
Spread the Love! |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Does a spilled glass of milk right itself and gush backwards into the glass? |
|
|||
|
The person you told me that the universe resets bilve in god and are a new ager.
She says '' it have happend before''. The only thing she has fore an evidence is that she says ''prove me wrong, there is no evidence that is have not reset it self before'' So there you go, i know it is not a vaild argument but it keeps a 14 year old kid awake a night. |
|
||||
|
She makes the claim, she needs to provide evidence. Saying "prove that they didn't" doesn't mean a thing. One thing you could do is say "there's an invisible elf on my shoulder. Prove me wrong".
__________________
Spread the Love! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Just because someone says it is "scientifically proven" doesn't make it so. Its like saying "It's scientifically proven that monkeys spontaneously turn into leaping leprichuans".
And capitalizing it doesn't make it more true.
__________________
Defining science can be difficult. It’s a method, a way of looking at things. It’s a compendium of facts, knowledge, data. It’s a tool, used to investigate the world and to make sure we don’t let our biases, egos, and wishes get in the way of finding what’s real. Science (and skepticism) boil off the dross and leave the pure nugget of reality. ~Phil Plait |
|
||||
|
Quote:
To be blunt, by asking questions, you are showing more maturity than I had at your age. Not that I show much maturity now... Anyway... It all is a learning process. Critical thinking is a learning process. It does not happen immediately, just as learning math or science does not happen immediately. I'm going to post a link http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html Read each one. Take time to really think about how often you use each one of these in daily life. Think about how often you hear them.. And think especially hard about why they are fallacies. In your quote, the statement is made: Quote:
Science does not work that way and if you see someone claiming something was proven by science- it demonstrates that they do not know science. Science makes observations in order to theorize the most accurate Model of reality that it can. That is all it does. Models can be changed with new and better observations. That's science. It can create a model that says it's 99.999999999999999999999999% likely that water is wet. But it can never prove that water is wet. Last edited by Neverfly; 10-October-2009 at 06:38 PM.. Reason: Thanks a LOT NickW- you made me remove an all caps word <grouchy> |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As to the History Channel . . . well, there's a lot of knowing what to watch involved there, and it makes me very upset about how much more of that it takes than it used to. Yesterday morning, I saw a very interesting show about humans in the Americas--mostly, actually, they talked about humans in what would become Los Angeles, because there's a very good source of fossils (albeit mostly not human ones) in downtown--and it was, based on what I remember from trips to the museum they showed in it, accurate and informative. I think the show about the "Lost Pyramid" they'd played before it was pretty good, too. The best guide I can offer is to ignore anything with the word "Nostradamus" in it. "Doomsday" is probably another one worth avoiding, though they have put that in actual educational programming once or twice. "Da Vinci" sounds as though it should be right out, but they've played a very good debunking show now and again.
__________________
Gillian "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'" "You can't erase icing." "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!" |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Did you read Demon-Haunted World yet? Are you using your baloney detection kit? Stop being helpless. ========================== Edit: Quote:
Here are some BAUT Forum topics that have addressed aspects of predictions for year 2012, and some allied articles:
Bad Astronomy Blog: 2012, the year nothing will happen Universe Today: 2012: No Planet X Universe Today: 2012: Planet X is not Nibiru Universe Today: 2012: No Killer Solar Flare Universe Today: 2012: No Geomagnetic Reversal Universe Today: 2012: No Comet Universe Today: Another Voice Against 2012 Mania Universe Today: 2012: Combat the Nonsense Astronomical Society of the Pacific: Doomsday 2012, the Planet Nibiru, and Cosmophobia (PDF)
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ... Last edited by 01101001; 20-October-2009 at 04:03 AM.. |
|
|||
|
Hello! I was reading some posts here on the forum, then I found this one, I dont really know what it means I am not afraid but here it is.
Quote:
Last edited by favole; 11-October-2009 at 07:13 PM.. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
You realize, of course, that proponents of the 2012 cataclysm will suddenly discover a "math error" that "proves" that the world will actually end in 2015. "Take heart; it's still not too late to prepare. Just send $19.95 (plus shipping and handling) to us and we'll tell you how." ![]()
__________________
--Doug "When your statics problem becomes a dynamics problem, you're in trouble." --me Moor's Law: "As you go from freshman engineering to Ph.D., the amount of work required per credit hour doubles approximately every 18 months." --me, inspired by Prof. Scott Moor |
|
|||
|
Yes this is what I heard two months ago, I am NOT afraid of this beacuse I know this is rubbish.
In the year 2025 all the pover plants in the world will be over heated and there will be a melt down from every power plant in the world. :/ When will the doomsday peapole stop? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
"Any Sufficiently Analyzed Magic is Indistinguishable from SCIENCE!" -Agatha Heterodyne "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -Florence Ambrose |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|