Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #391 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2009, 09:51 AM
NorthernBoy NorthernBoy is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spoons View Post
t's often this silly idea that common sense is the be all and end all - "my experiences are universal law!" - that seems to stunt people's perception. The Universe is not necessarily designed with us in mind. (I suppose it is possible, but not likely)
One thing that has helped sometimes with people who think that their common sense trumps science is to come up with a couple of examples where their common sense is dead wrong.

The rate of all of two objects of differing weights is actually a good one. If you can get someone to make a prediction (and hopefully it is that the heavier thing will fall faster*), then defend it in a dogmatic and vehement fashion, and then see that they were dead wrong, it may help them to understand why common sense does not always work.

One of the things that we learn during a physics education is to try to remove personal incredulity from a situation. It can seem weird that you get missing maxima in an X-ray crystallograph, that there exists an energy gap in crystals, that time really is relative, and so on, but we learn that these things are true, and measure their truth, and this helps us to avoid rushing to conclusion later, and then defending it without thought.

*And yes, you need appropriate masses to make this obvious, but you can happily pick two things whose mass differs by a factor of ten or more, such as a small coin and an apple, and find that both fall as near as matters at the same rate from shoulder height to floor.
Reply With Quote
  #392 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2009, 01:23 PM
iquestor iquestor is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
The rate of all of two objects of differing weights is actually a good one. If you can get someone to make a prediction (and hopefully it is that the heavier thing will fall faster*), then defend it in a dogmatic and vehement fashion, and then see that they were dead wrong, it may help them to understand why common sense does not always work.
IIRC Apollo 15 (Scott) performed this experiment with an eagle feather and a hammer. Because of Air resitance on Earth, the feather would float down, so it cant be performed here. However on the Moon, it was shown they fell at the same rate. Can we not offer this as evidence we went to the Moon? Oh. right. All that footage was faked.
Reply With Quote
  #393 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2009, 02:31 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 19,705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iquestor View Post
Can we not offer this as evidence we went to the Moon?
It has been, on multiple threads in this forum.

Here for one
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #394 (permalink)  
Old 21-October-2009, 08:29 PM
LaurelHS's Avatar
LaurelHS LaurelHS is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,072
Default

Slight nitpick, it was a falcon feather. Fitting when you're part of an all-Air Force crew and your LM is named Falcon.
__________________
"One does not require alien ruins in order to absorb a profound sense of wonder and mystery from the moon. That our civilization had actually visited it is miracle enough." Jason Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #395 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 02:57 AM
nomuse nomuse is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,522
Send a message via AIM to nomuse
Default

In my work I often run into a filter before that filter. It's not even that common-sense doesn't describe the event at hand well, it is that the person doesn't even realize there IS something that goes outside of their untrained intuition. Where this hits me in the paycheck is when the client is going, "What's all this blabbering about comb filtering and decibel scale and feedback threshold? Just give my singer two mics and he'll be twice as loud, okay?"
__________________
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Reply With Quote
  #396 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 09:01 AM
Mellow's Avatar
Mellow Mellow is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iquestor View Post
IIRC Apollo 15 (Scott) performed this experiment with an eagle feather and a hammer. Because of Air resitance on Earth, the feather would float down, so it cant be performed here. However on the Moon, it was shown they fell at the same rate. Can we not offer this as evidence we went to the Moon? Oh. right. All that footage was faked.
I forget where, but I've read claims that the feather was a fake made out of lead! I know, people will keep on spinning to protect their arguement that the Apollo missions were faked.
__________________
There we were in the park when suddenly some old lady says I stole her purse..... I chucked the professor at her but she kept coming..... So I had to hit her with this purse I found.
-- Bender
Reply With Quote
  #397 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 09:41 AM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomuse View Post
In my work I often run into a filter before that filter. It's not even that common-sense doesn't describe the event at hand well, it is that the person doesn't even realize there IS something that goes outside of their untrained intuition. Where this hits me in the paycheck is when the client is going, "What's all this blabbering about comb filtering and decibel scale and feedback threshold? Just give my singer two mics and he'll be twice as loud, okay?"
But to answer that how about answering "Errrr ... No! BUT if we put on a tiny touch of reverb and a fraction of a second delay on one mic he can be his own backing singer ..... !"
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #398 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 09:44 AM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

On the 'common sense' theme, there was someone at work who was questioning the validity of Apollo and said, "They used parachutes to land the capsule in the ocean when they returned, why didn't they use parachutes to land on the moon?"
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....

Last edited by Skyfire; 22-October-2009 at 09:45 AM.. Reason: added word 'theme' instead of 'idea'
Reply With Quote
  #399 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 10:43 AM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,420
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyfire View Post
"They used parachutes to land the capsule in the ocean when they returned, why didn't they use parachutes to land on the moon?"
Duh.

Obviously because there was no water to land in.

Sheesh...
Reply With Quote
  #400 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 12:18 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyfire View Post
there was someone at work who was questioning the validity of Apollo
and said, "They used parachutes to land the capsule in the ocean when
they returned, why didn't they use parachutes to land on the moon?"
That is mind-boggling. I think I would like to have witnessed that
conversation. I don't suppose you can relate what was said next?

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
__________________
http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

"I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

"The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves
Reply With Quote
  #401 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 01:13 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Root View Post
That is mind-boggling. I think I would like to have witnessed that
conversation. I don't suppose you can relate what was said next?

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
As you can imagine I sat there for a moment thinking 'Ooooohkaaay,.... where do I start?'

However, he was soon put right with a simple discussion about atmosphere, and what a lack of it ACTUALLY MEANS .... including making parachutes just dead weight and useless. We then went on to discuss gravity and how 1/6 G makes a lot of difference to amount of fuel, thrust required etc.

It was quite interesting having to go back to very basic principles at times to explain things.

A later discussion moved to the photos and shadows, so I got him to refer to some of his own photos, and he soon began to understand that! He had even found the 'no stars' "argument" by now but referring him to try to take photos at night which included stars, we soon sorted that one.

It is always frustrating when we see people on the 'net who are so entrenched that they are never prepared to try stuff and actually TEST it for themselves.

Needless to say I showed him how to investigate and try it out for himself, not just believe everything he read on the internet ...

It took time, over about two weeks, but from being very skeptical at first (due to some stuff he had read) he came to understand what an amazing scientific and engineering adventure and achievement the moon landings were.
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #402 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 01:28 PM
Daggerstab's Avatar
Daggerstab Daggerstab is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyfire View Post
Needless to say I showed him how to investigate and try it out for himself, not just believe everything he read on the internet ...

It took time, over about two weeks, but from being very skeptical at first (due to some stuff he had read) he came to understand what an amazing scientific and engineering adventure and achievement the moon landings were.
You know, I actually bookmark such "success stories". It's nice to know that some people can be reasoned with.
__________________
(As you can guess from the location, English is not my native language.)
Reply With Quote
  #403 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 02:42 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daggerstab View Post
You know, I actually bookmark such "success stories". It's nice to know that some people can be reasoned with.
Yes, he was skeptical, but not a CT believer. If he had read a lot more CT stuff before we began (what I hope was) our reasoned discussion, who knows?

Anyway, yes, put it down to a success. That kind of discussion when you really have to go back to science basics can be quite helpful for your own understanding!

It also makes me realise just how much our (UK) education system seems to have lost since I was at school. His education was more than 20 years after mine!
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #404 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 02:55 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Root View Post
That is mind-boggling. I think I would like to have witnessed that
conversation. I don't suppose you can relate what was said next?

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
Ok, I have now found the post in question, because I did post about it a couple of years ago in a different thread : HB quote of the day

... and I had forgotten his SECOND mention of the parachute (which is true!)
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #405 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 03:20 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 26,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mellow View Post
I forget where, but I've read claims that the feather was a fake made out of lead! I know, people will keep on spinning to protect their arguement that the Apollo missions were faked.
Someone made a video showing a feather and a hammer falling at the same speed, which looked really impressive until you watched carefully and noticed that the "feather" bounced.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #406 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 03:27 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,646
Default

Thanks, Skyfire!

-- Jeff

.
Reply With Quote
  #407 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 04:05 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Root View Post
Thanks, Skyfire!

-- Jeff

.

Oh dear! What have I said?!


Do I take it you teach in the UK?
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....

Last edited by Skyfire; 22-October-2009 at 04:09 PM.. Reason: changed 'here' to say UK
Reply With Quote
  #408 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 04:21 PM
Jeff Root Jeff Root is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,646
Default

No, what did I say? Or not say that you expected me to say?

-- Jeff, still in Minneapolis

.
Reply With Quote
  #409 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 04:30 PM
cosmicdave's Avatar
cosmicdave cosmicdave is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iquestor View Post
IIRC Apollo 15 (Scott) performed this experiment with an eagle feather and a hammer. Because of Air resitance on Earth, the feather would float down, so it cant be performed here. However on the Moon, it was shown they fell at the same rate. Can we not offer this as evidence we went to the Moon? Oh. right. All that footage was faked.

Actually, such an experiment was shown on the DVD 'Darkmoon' which is widely available. You don't have to be on the Moon to recreate the experiment.

And as far as this guys article goes - I thoroughly enjoyed it. He summarised really well and pretty much showed up a lot of the regular posters on this forum as being wrong.

As he says - no original footage or blueprints are available, and the footage seen by the World was hardly 'live' now was it?
__________________
There are several of us who do believe in UFOs and who have had occasion to see a UFO on the ground, or from an airplane. There was only one occasion from space which may have been a UFO."

Gordon Cooper, Astronaut (Mercury-Atlas 9, May 15, 1963; Gemini 5, August 21, 1965), Col. USAF (Ret); letter to Granada's Ambassador Griffith at the United Nations, November 9, 1978

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk - Europe's biggest UFO database.
Reply With Quote
  #410 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 04:42 PM
Jason Thompson Jason Thompson is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicdave View Post
Actually, such an experiment was shown on the DVD 'Darkmoon' which is widely available. You don't have to be on the Moon to recreate the experiment.
Oh yes you do. The 'recreation' on that video fails by virtue of having the feather released point down, or in other words, in its most aerodynamic orientation. Had the experiment been repeated holding the feather horizontally, as it was in the Apollo 15 broadcast, the result would have been very different.

Quote:
And as far as this guys article goes - I thoroughly enjoyed it. He summarised really well and pretty much showed up a lot of the regular posters on this forum as being wrong.
What a load of rubbish. The guy argues from incredulity and makes so many fundamental errors you have to wonder what he actually knows about anything.

Quote:
As he says - no original footage or blueprints are available, and the footage seen by the World was hardly 'live' now was it?
Again, rubbish. Original footage and blueprints are available if you know where to look and what you should reasonably expect to find.
__________________
"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common: They don't alter their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views." The Doctor, Doctor Who: The Face of Evil.
Reply With Quote
  #411 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 04:57 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,738
Default

CosmicDave...Will you be addressing the questions you left unanswered last time you were here??...or is this just a "flyby" to take "potshots" at posters?

If the latter than don't bother.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #412 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 05:05 PM
R.A.F.'s Avatar
R.A.F. R.A.F. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicdave View Post
...pretty much showed up a lot of the regular posters on this forum as being wrong.
Can you present evidence that posters here were wrong?

Consider that a direct question.
__________________
"The facts gentlemen, and nothing but the facts, for careful eyes are narrowly watching." Isaac Asimov
Reply With Quote
  #413 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 05:56 PM
pjwarez's Avatar
pjwarez pjwarez is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicdave View Post
Actually, such an experiment was shown on the DVD 'Darkmoon' which is widely available. You don't have to be on the Moon to recreate the experiment.
I believe I've seen the experiment you speak of. It most certainty was NOT recreated in "Darkmoon" and has been discredited many times. I believe it was done by David Percy, and he (IMHO), just like Bart Sibrel, is nothing more than another uneducated hoax nut-bar seeking attention.

In his so-called "recreation", the only way he could get the feather to drop at the same rate as the hammer was to turn the feather longways, or at a right angle to the ground. There is NO WAY on Earth, in an atmosphere to have the feather drop at the same rate with its length parallel to the ground, as it was in the Apollo 15 experiment!
Reply With Quote
  #414 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 06:07 PM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicdave View Post
...
You don't have to be on the Moon to recreate the experiment.

Percy didn't recreate the experiment. He approximated it. He doesn't get points for that. And now apparently he's off hiding in France now so he doesn't have to listen to people questioning his findings.

...pretty much showed up a lot of the regular posters on this forum as being wrong.

And then retracted it. All he did was call us names and say, "Nuh-uh, I know differently." Since you don't have any qualifications in this area, I don't imagine why you think you know whether he was on target or not. Specific rebuttals were given.

I invited David McGowan to discuss his findings with me personally -- including those aimed directly at me. Not only did he refuse my invitation for a discussion, he called me childish names and told me to do something with myself. (I'm sure you can guess what.)

Now is that really the kind of author you want to put on your pedestal? I go to great lengths to remain accountable for my public statements. He does not.

As he says - no original footage...

Wrong.

...or blueprints are available

Wrong. What have you personally done to locate any of this material? David Percy didn't look. And since both you and David McGowan simply crib mindlessly from his material, you don't know any better yourself.

...the footage seen by the World was hardly 'live' now was it?

In what way wasn't it live?
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #415 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 06:38 PM
Extravoice's Avatar
Extravoice Extravoice is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Democratic People's Republic of New Jersey
Posts: 1,010
Default

...the footage seen by the World was hardly 'live' now was it?
In what way wasn't it live?


This is a new claim to me, too. Please elaborate, Cosmicdave.
__________________
I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them. -- Jimmy Hoffa
Reply With Quote
  #416 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 06:58 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 17,859
Default

It was on delay, at least. Does that count as "hardly live"? If you're being a stickler instead of realistic, sure.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #417 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 07:15 PM
iquestor iquestor is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurelHS View Post
Slight nitpick, it was a falcon feather. Fitting when you're part of an all-Air Force crew and your LM is named Falcon.
Thanks for the correction. I think I knew that but then re-forgot it.
Reply With Quote
  #418 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 11:30 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyfire View Post
Oh dear! What have I said?!


Do I take it you teach in the UK?
Ignore me ... I've been out on a brewery trip .... [homer mode] mmmmmmmmm beer! [/homer mode]
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #419 (permalink)  
Old 22-October-2009, 11:32 PM
Skyfire's Avatar
Skyfire Skyfire is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull, UK
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Root View Post
No, what did I say? Or not say that you expected me to say?

-- Jeff, still in Minneapolis

.
See above ..... i seem to have got coplettley rong end of stick... and tiping gone to pot ....
__________________
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm.... that's funny...'
- Isaac Asimov

"Entering the lottery defines you as a gambler; supporting SETI defines you as a human ... with passion and hope for the future." - Cosmopaul67 - 28th Jan 2010

Are we alone in the Universe? Are we the only intelligent life? Who knows? But the universe is so BIG, it somehow seems such a waste of space if we are ....
Reply With Quote
  #420 (permalink)  
Old 23-October-2009, 07:27 AM
HenrikOlsen's Avatar
HenrikOlsen HenrikOlsen is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark 55.6773° N 12.3610° E
Posts: 9,675
Send a message via MSN to HenrikOlsen Send a message via Yahoo to HenrikOlsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike alexander View Post
The idea of artificial satellites was not just something that popped out of thin air. As part of the planning for the International Geophysical Year (1957-58):
And Clarke's paper that introduces the geostationary orbit is from 1945.
__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’
Andrew Vachss, Autobiographical essay
Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Wagging The Moondoggie" by Dave McGowan Magnificent Desolation Conspiracy Theories 32 10-December-2009 11:30 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today