Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > The Proving Grounds > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 09:36 PM
Donnie B.'s Avatar
Donnie B. Donnie B. is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,693
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.A.F. View Post
My favorite part of that site is the mislabeling of the LRRR...he calls it the Lunar Laser Ranger experiment.
Hey, watch it, pal! Lunar Laser Rangers is my favorite Japanimation show!

At least this guy came up with one new claim (the high-gain antenna picture, new to me at least). The fact that the claim is laughably wrong is par for the course, but he tried.
__________________
Relight the Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 09:37 PM
PetersCreek's Avatar
PetersCreek PetersCreek is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Peters Creek, Alaska
Posts: 2,923
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BertL View Post
I wonder if the jimbot and jayben are connected.
I don't see the connection and I don't think it's appropriate to speculate at this point.
__________________
Brett
Peters Creek, Alaska
─────────────────────────────────────────────
My moderation comments will appear in this color.
To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post:
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice

Last edited by PetersCreek; 07-October-2009 at 09:51 PM.. Reason: added quote
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 10:00 PM
Larry Jacks Larry Jacks is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,280
Default

Originally Posted by BertL
I wonder if the jimbot and jayben are connected.


I don't know but I've long suspected that HBs and Jim Beam are connected.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 11:03 PM
Alan G. Archer's Avatar
Alan G. Archer Alan G. Archer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 524
Default

I count five instances, on pages 2, 4 and 5, that McGowan refers to lunar orbital altitude as being (exactly) 69 miles. That should be 69 nautical miles. Even Ralph Rene wasn't that sloppy, if I'm not mistaken.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 11:35 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Jacks View Post
Originally Posted by BertL
I wonder if the jimbot and jayben are connected.


I don't know but I've long suspected that HBs and Jim Beam are connected.
Hey, I take that personally... I'm rather fond of Jim Beam; though of course, in moderation.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 07-October-2009, 11:54 PM
slang's Avatar
slang slang is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 4,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift View Post
Hey, I take that personally... I'm rather fond of Jim Beam; though of course, in moderation.
Well, that explains the "i'll close the thread and deal with it later" happenings ;P
__________________
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge" -- Charles Darwin
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
Meet the OOONG TOE.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 01:20 AM
Starfury Starfury is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 173
Default

We should probably located the nearest traffic cop because it looks like we have another hit and run.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 02:36 AM
BigDon's Avatar
BigDon BigDon is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 5,846
Default

What's the malware situation on that site? I'd hate to have to log out, raise shields and go in stealth mode if I don't have to.

It DOES sounds like this guy got his hand slapped here and is all pouty. Otherwise he wouldn't know all the main characters here by name now would he?
__________________
In your rush to call everyone "entrenched" or closed-minded or "limited" you fail to note that the "limit" here has a very natural boundary: that point at which the evidence stops. - JayUtah

Science fiction was never meant to be an educational tool. - Editor Amazing Tales
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:09 AM
Alan G. Archer's Avatar
Alan G. Archer Alan G. Archer is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 524
Default

Both hpHosts Online and McAfee SiteAdvisor reported no problems with McGowan's site. Google's Safe Browsing diagnostic also reported no malware activity.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:14 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 16,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDon View Post
It DOES sounds like this guy got his hand slapped here and is all pouty. Otherwise he wouldn't know all the main characters here by name now would he?
I can think of at least two other options. One, he's lurked. Two, he knows someone who's gotten their hand slapped and has listened to the sob story.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:33 AM
Dave J Dave J is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 799
Default

"Aerodynamics" and "LM" don't belong in the same sentence...and there's a perfectly good reason for that. It's frustrating that the CTs just cannot see the LM for the wonderful purpose-built machine that it is.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:40 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torsten View Post
I guess I'll start at a random spot:

Regarding the laser reflectors, David McGowan wrote:


Jimbot: Do you think McGowan's questions are valid? Why or why not?

ETA: Perhaps I should have waited for a response to PetersCreeks' question, but it's difficult to hold off when seeing yet another website repeating the same old unresearched and idiotic claims, after stating: "While suffering through the numbing uniformity of the various websites on both sides of the aisle, it became perfectly clear that the hoax side of the debate was in serious need of a fresh approach and some new insights. So I began writing again. Feverishly."
Strictly in terms of rhetorical style it is safe to say that big Phil was spanked in a painful way throughout this article.

"
Plait also notes that originally on his site he had said “that the engines also cut off early, before the moment of touchdown, to prevent dust from getting blown around and disturbing the Astronauts’ view of the surface. This was an incorrect assertion.” The funny thing is though that he voiced that “incorrect assertion” just as forcefully and as arrogantly as he voices all the other assertions on his page – which makes sense, I guess, since everything else on his page is incorrect as well.
"
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:41 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PetersCreek View Post
If one applies a very, very loose definition of "spanked"...well...still, no. There is so much wrong with that rambling screed, it's hard to know where to start.

Before we do start, do you intend to defend this position here?
Did you read the article?
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:41 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torsten View Post
I guess I'll start at a random spot:

Regarding the laser reflectors, David McGowan wrote:


Jimbot: Do you think McGowan's questions are valid? Why or why not?

ETA: Perhaps I should have waited for a response to PetersCreeks' question, but it's difficult to hold off when seeing yet another website repeating the same old unresearched and idiotic claims, after stating: "While suffering through the numbing uniformity of the various websites on both sides of the aisle, it became perfectly clear that the hoax side of the debate was in serious need of a fresh approach and some new insights. So I began writing again. Feverishly."
Strictly in terms of rhetorical style it is safe to say that big Phil was spanked in a painful way throughout this article..

"
Plait also notes that originally on his site he had said “that the engines also cut off early, before the moment of touchdown, to prevent dust from getting blown around and disturbing the Astronauts’ view of the surface. This was an incorrect assertion.” The funny thing is though that he voiced that “incorrect assertion” just as forcefully and as arrogantly as he voices all the other assertions on his page – which makes sense, I guess, since everything else on his page is incorrect as well.
"
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:43 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayUtah View Post
I echo PetersCreek's question. Since the referenced site also attempts to take me personally to task, do you (jimbot) intend to stand in the site author's place and defend his claims against me?
Are you Phil? because he really does provide a few laughs at your expense.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:45 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iquestor View Post

Question: Was there even a mention of the recent direct photographs made of the various apollo landing sites by LRO?

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/3694...ollo11_lrg.jpg
< edited by moderator Swift to change a very large picture to a link >
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:46 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Posts do not seem to be going through here. I had 2 posts not come though.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:46 AM
LaurelHS LaurelHS is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 828
Default

JayUtah and the Bad Astronomer are different people. People here have explained that the article you posted is extremely inaccurate. What do you say to that?
__________________
"One does not require alien ruins in order to absorb a profound sense of wonder and mystery from the moon. That our civilization had actually visited it is miracle enough." Jason Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:47 AM
pjwarez's Avatar
pjwarez pjwarez is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
Did you read the article?
Well I can't speak for Peter, but seeing that his first post was this...
Quote:
There is so much wrong with that rambling screed, it's hard to know where to start.
.. it would be a safe bet that he did.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:55 AM
Grashtel Grashtel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
Posts do not seem to be going through here. I had 2 posts not come though.
Do they have links in them? If so then they are being held in the moderation queue, as an anti-spam feature posts form new members that contain links get held for moderation.
__________________
"Any Sufficiently Analyzed Magic is Indistinguishable from SCIENCE!" -Agatha Heterodyne

"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -Florence Ambrose
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 03:56 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

"
What the suits did, in essence, was provide the astronauts with their own little portable, climate-controlled, radiation-protected atmosphere.
"

Anyone want to talk about that one.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:05 AM
NickW's Avatar
NickW NickW is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bandon, OR
Posts: 764
Default

Actually, jimbot, what most of us want is an answer to some of the questions.
__________________
Defining science can be difficult. It’s a method, a way of looking at things. It’s a compendium of facts, knowledge, data. It’s a tool, used to investigate the world and to make sure we don’t let our biases, egos, and wishes get in the way of finding what’s real. Science (and skepticism) boil off the dross and leave the pure nugget of reality. ~Phil Plait
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:12 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

"
doesn't it seem just a little strange that experts would now suggest that if we get to work right away, we might be able to land men on the Moon by the year 2020? Isn't that like saying that with a lot of hard work and a little luck, we might be able to develop a video game as technologically advanced as Pong by the year 2025? Or that by 2030, the scientific community might produce a battery-operated calculator small enough to fit into your pocket?
"

Any takers?
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:13 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickW View Post
Actually, jimbot, what most of us want is an answer to some of the questions.
I am just a neutral observer waiting to be convinced by the best argument. Unfortunately for your side Phil started by getting spanked.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:18 AM
LaurelHS LaurelHS is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
"
doesn't it seem just a little strange that experts would now suggest that if we get to work right away, we might be able to land men on the Moon by the year 2020? Isn't that like saying that with a lot of hard work and a little luck, we might be able to develop a video game as technologically advanced as Pong by the year 2025? Or that by 2030, the scientific community might produce a battery-operated calculator small enough to fit into your pocket?
"

Any takers?
They're not talking about landing two men on the Moon and having them spend three days there like the longest Apollo missions. They're talking about larger crews, longer stays and maybe building a base on the Moon. So that requires the development of new technology. And they no longer have the huge budget that they had during the Apollo program.
__________________
"One does not require alien ruins in order to absorb a profound sense of wonder and mystery from the moon. That our civilization had actually visited it is miracle enough." Jason Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:18 AM
JayUtah's Avatar
JayUtah JayUtah is online now
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
...
I am just a neutral observer...

I doubt it.

...waiting to be convinced by the best argument.

Sorry, that's not what happens here. You don't get to present someone else's claims so that you can enjoy them when they work for you and then back away from them as "someone else's work" as soon as things start going bad for you. Participation in this forum requires you personally to state and defend a case.

Unfortunately for your side Phil started by getting spanked.

Nope. Most of what's on the other side of your link is simply an argument from incredulity.

What did you personally do to confirm, test, or verify any of that author's claims before declaring victory?
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things." --John Adams
Clavius Moon Base
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:20 AM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 17,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
Posts do not seem to be going through here. I had 2 posts not come though.
As part of our anti-spam measures, links from new posters, particularly if they have links or attachments, get held in a queue until approved. Depending on whether any moderators are around, it can sometimes be a couple of hours till that happens. I have now approved them, with an edit to one, to change a very large image to a link (much nicer for people with slow connections and because of copyright issues).

Now that we got that out of the way, jimbot, I have already told you that you need to clearly state what your thoughts are, what evidence you have, and you need to start answering questions. If you have not read the rules or the Advice for Conspiracy Theory Supporters, I very strongly urge it.

Lastly, though Phil Plait, the Bad Astronomer, is a co-owner of this forum, he very rarely participates here. So if you are waiting for a reply from him, you will probably be disappointed.
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:20 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
I am just a neutral observer waiting to be convinced by the best argument. Unfortunately for your side Phil started by getting spanked.
If your assertion is that Phil Plait got spanked, you're not neutral, are you?

If you would like to discuss the articles accuracy- Pick one at a time and cover it.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:20 AM
ZappBrannigan's Avatar
ZappBrannigan ZappBrannigan is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbot View Post
I am just a neutral observer waiting to be convinced by the best argument. Unfortunately for your side Phil started by getting spanked.
Yeah. Sounds totally neutral.
__________________
See? Because of me, now there's a warning. -Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 08-October-2009, 04:21 AM
jimbot jimbot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurelHS View Post
They're not talking about landing two men on the Moon and having them spend three days there like the longest Apollo missions. They're talking about larger crews, longer stays and maybe building a base on the Moon. So that requires the development of new technology. And they no longer have the huge budget that they had during the Apollo program.
So you are saying that in a couple of years we could throw together a 3 day stay on the moon without much trouble? I just do not get that impression that that is true. A private company or other country would have done it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Wagging The Moondoggie" by Dave McGowan Magnificent Desolation Conspiracy Theories 25 08-April-2002 08:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today