<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum - Astrophotography</title>
		<link>http://www.bautforum.com/</link>
		<description>Post your pictures.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:17:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Ngc210 11/19/09</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96932-ngc210-11-19-09-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This very faint 10.9 mag spiral galaxy in Cetus has a very bright core but with very faint tidal arms. In this frame up close to a dozen galaxies are in this area alone (mag 14-17 ) and another dozen just around it.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This very faint 10.9 mag spiral galaxy in Cetus has a very bright core but with very faint tidal arms. In this frame up close to a dozen galaxies are in this area alone (mag 14-17 ) and another dozen just around it.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11255d1258688047-ngc210-11-19-09-ngc210-l3hr-35m-rgb33m-7ll.jpg" target="_blank">NGC210-L3hr-35m-RGB33m-7LL.jpg</a> (123.3 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11256d1258688047-ngc210-11-19-09-ngc210-l3hr-35m-rgb33m-neg-7ll.jpg" target="_blank">NGC210-L3hr-35m-RGB33m-Neg-7LL.jpg</a> (121.7 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>JAICOA</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96932-ngc210-11-19-09-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ngc 2340 / wbl 133</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96908-ngc-2340-wbl-133-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Taking a break from Arp galaxies:

NGC 2340 is the largest and brightest member of the WBL 133 galaxy group located about 275 million light-years away in the constellation of Lynx and not far from the far larger Abell 569.  The group contains some 13 members though not all are withing my image.  I should have moved 2340 from the center to capture more of them but this was taken automatically as I slept so the scope just obeyed my instructions to center on 2340.  As with most groups the members are mostly elliptical and S0 galaxies and thus showing the golden color of old stars due to the lack of new star formation.  Apparently these galaxies have so interacted with other members of the group that the dust and gas needed for star formation has been stripped from them leaving them to slowly redden and fade away.

The spherical galaxy to the upper left of NGC 2340 is IC 465 and maybe also NGC 2334.  Why the "maybe"?  Seems there's lots of problems with the visual observations that created the NGC catalog.  This is one of them.  Since the catalog is numbered in RA order (at the time of the catalog, precession has changed things somewhat since then when looking at galaxies today on opposite sides of the sky) it should be west of NGC 2340 not east.  This is the first hint that something may be wrong.  For further information I'll refer you to Dr. Corwin's discussion at the NGC catalog.  http://www.ngcicproject.org/dss/dss_n2300.asp Scroll down to NGC 2334 and click on the data button then scroll down that window for the lengthy discussion.  

The large elliptical near the right edge nearly directly west of NGC 2340 is NGC 2332.  Below it is IC 457 which may or may not be NGC 2330.  This problem is included in the lengthy discussion of IC 465/NGC 2334 in the above link.  

I've made an annotated image showing member galaxies as well as a few non member ones.  If they are a member no distance is given.  If a non member the distance in millions of light-years is appended to the name.  Some have no red shift data so are noted with a ? for distance.

There are some other ID problems in this image.  IC 462 is just a blue star.  Could it be the observer saw the nearby galaxy but got the position of the star by mistake?  I can't find anything on this one.  

Then there's the blue object I've identified as [VCV2001] J071006.8+500245 at almost 2 billion light-years.  NED shows many different catalog entries for it.  One, the one I used, says it is a quasar, one of the closest known.  Another calls it a galaxy (RX J0710.0+5002 ID) as well as an X-ray source.  It's shown as an IR source in the 2MASS catalog (2MASSi J0710068+500246). It is also listed in several radio catalogs.  It certainly is using most of the spectrum.  Due to its strong blue color, typical of "nearby" quasars I chose to go with the quasar designation.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Image with less compression:
http://www.spacebanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2707&stc=1

Rick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Taking a break from Arp galaxies:<br />
<br />
NGC 2340 is the largest and brightest member of the WBL 133 galaxy group located about 275 million light-years away in the constellation of Lynx and not far from the far larger Abell 569.  The group contains some 13 members though not all are withing my image.  I should have moved 2340 from the center to capture more of them but this was taken automatically as I slept so the scope just obeyed my instructions to center on 2340.  As with most groups the members are mostly elliptical and S0 galaxies and thus showing the golden color of old stars due to the lack of new star formation.  Apparently these galaxies have so interacted with other members of the group that the dust and gas needed for star formation has been stripped from them leaving them to slowly redden and fade away.<br />
<br />
The spherical galaxy to the upper left of NGC 2340 is IC 465 and maybe also NGC 2334.  Why the &quot;maybe&quot;?  Seems there's lots of problems with the visual observations that created the NGC catalog.  This is one of them.  Since the catalog is numbered in RA order (at the time of the catalog, precession has changed things somewhat since then when looking at galaxies today on opposite sides of the sky) it should be west of NGC 2340 not east.  This is the first hint that something may be wrong.  For further information I'll refer you to Dr. Corwin's discussion at the NGC catalog.  <a href="http://www.ngcicproject.org/dss/dss_n2300.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ngcicproject.org/dss/dss_n2300.asp</a> Scroll down to NGC 2334 and click on the data button then scroll down that window for the lengthy discussion.  <br />
<br />
The large elliptical near the right edge nearly directly west of NGC 2340 is NGC 2332.  Below it is IC 457 which may or may not be NGC 2330.  This problem is included in the lengthy discussion of IC 465/NGC 2334 in the above link.  <br />
<br />
I've made an annotated image showing member galaxies as well as a few non member ones.  If they are a member no distance is given.  If a non member the distance in millions of light-years is appended to the name.  Some have no red shift data so are noted with a ? for distance.<br />
<br />
There are some other ID problems in this image.  IC 462 is just a blue star.  Could it be the observer saw the nearby galaxy but got the position of the star by mistake?  I can't find anything on this one.  <br />
<br />
Then there's the blue object I've identified as [VCV2001] J071006.8+500245 at almost 2 billion light-years.  NED shows many different catalog entries for it.  One, the one I used, says it is a quasar, one of the closest known.  Another calls it a galaxy (RX J0710.0+5002 ID) as well as an X-ray source.  It's shown as an IR source in the 2MASS catalog (2MASSi J0710068+500246). It is also listed in several radio catalogs.  It certainly is using most of the spectrum.  Due to its strong blue color, typical of &quot;nearby&quot; quasars I chose to go with the quasar designation.<br />
<br />
14&quot; LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME<br />
<br />
Image with less compression:<br />
<a href="http://www.spacebanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2707&amp;stc=1" target="_blank">http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=2707&amp;stc=1</a><br />
<br />
Rick</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11253d1258664884-ngc-2340-wbl-133-ngc2340l4x10rgb2x10-7.jpg" target="_blank">NGC2340L4X10RGB2X10-7.jpg</a> (135.8 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11254d1258664884-ngc-2340-wbl-133-ngc2340l4x10rgb2x10-id.jpg" target="_blank">NGC2340L4X10RGB2X10-id.jpg</a> (125.8 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>RickJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96908-ngc-2340-wbl-133-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Horsehead Up Close in Ha</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96877-horsehead-up-close-ha.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:04:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Last weekend after a bit of follies with my set-up that led to only a small amount of imaging time, I took 30 minutes of Ha data of the Horsehead Nebula through my C-11 at f10.

30 minutes Ha with an ST-10 on a C-11 @ f10, binned 2x2.  Calibrated and stacked in CCDStack, major processing in PixInsight, finishing in Photoshop.

A full story of my issues that night and my processing procedure is on my web site (http://obsballona.net/wordpress/2009/11/18/horsehead-nebula-at-f10/).

Clear skies,

--Andy</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Last weekend after a bit of follies with my set-up that led to only a small amount of imaging time, I took 30 minutes of Ha data of the Horsehead Nebula through my C-11 at f10.<br />
<br />
30 minutes Ha with an ST-10 on a C-11 @ f10, binned 2x2.  Calibrated and stacked in CCDStack, major processing in PixInsight, finishing in Photoshop.<br />
<br />
A full story of my issues that night and my processing procedure is on my <a href="http://obsballona.net/wordpress/2009/11/18/horsehead-nebula-at-f10/" target="_blank">web site</a>.<br />
<br />
Clear skies,<br />
<br />
--Andy</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11249d1258610644-horsehead-up-close-ha-horse-091114-ha-nr-sm.jpg" target="_blank">Horse-091114-Ha-NR-sm.jpg</a> (140.6 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>andyschlei</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96877-horsehead-up-close-ha.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arp 187  For Arp galaxy lovers only</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96867-arp-187-arp-galaxy-lovers-only.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Been a while since I posted an image.  Seems my ISP screwed up my connection.  I could send tiny text messages but anything larger would stop mid transmission.  They seem to have it fixed.  Unfortunately this is not one of Arp's more interesting galaxies from a visual point of view.

Arp 187 is classed under Arp's Galaxies (not classifiable as S or E): Narrow filaments.  It is otherwise known as MCG-02-13-040A, a radio galaxy about 550 million light years away.  

Arp's image, inverted from mine, shows a faint narrow filament going south east from the galaxy.  It is best seen in my image if the image size is reduced.  On the other hand I show a large filament to the NW out of the frame of Arp's image.  It shows on the DSS plates so is real though only slightly above my noise level.  I do need to add time to this one.  Arp apparently saw the NW filament as shown by his comment: "Faint filament points to dense nucleus.  Possible fainter filament toward compact galaxy to NW."  The galaxy is located in the northeast corner of Eridanus not far from Rigel.  This is likely a somewhat obscured region due to dust in our galaxy.  It's also too far south for good seeing from my location.

This field is rather barren of other galaxies.  Nor do I see a certain candidate for interaction with Arp 187.  It might be that it is the result of a merger that has already happened.  The northern filament passes right by a possible candidate.  It's just right of the filament and appears like a slightly distorted star. It is the IR galaxy 2MASX J05045039-1013535.  Little information is available for it.  One note at NED says; "Interacting with compact galaxy to the northwest?  Radio-source. M 05-10, 6 arcmin to the north."  Is this the galaxy the note refers to?  I don't see it being massive enough to have caused this much disruption if at the same distance.  It appears to me more likely it is far beyond it.  As to the radio source NED doesn't list it or show any source 6 minutes north of Arp 187.

The obvious galaxy west and a tad south of Arp 187 is 2MASX J05044617-1015169, another IR galaxy with little information available.  

The large galaxy near the top right of center is IC 401, an SB(rs)b? and possible LINER galaxy about 150 million light years distant.  Far too close to have anything to do with Arp 187.  There are a few other IR galaxies in the image but none with much information.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB 2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Arp's image:
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Arp/Figures/big_arp187.jpeg

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

I've included a 2x enlargement for what it is worth.

Rick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Been a while since I posted an image.  Seems my ISP screwed up my connection.  I could send tiny text messages but anything larger would stop mid transmission.  They seem to have it fixed.  Unfortunately this is not one of Arp's more interesting galaxies from a visual point of view.<br />
<br />
Arp 187 is classed under Arp's Galaxies (not classifiable as S or E): Narrow filaments.  It is otherwise known as MCG-02-13-040A, a radio galaxy about 550 million light years away.  <br />
<br />
Arp's image, inverted from mine, shows a faint narrow filament going south east from the galaxy.  It is best seen in my image if the image size is reduced.  On the other hand I show a large filament to the NW out of the frame of Arp's image.  It shows on the DSS plates so is real though only slightly above my noise level.  I do need to add time to this one.  Arp apparently saw the NW filament as shown by his comment: &quot;Faint filament points to dense nucleus.  Possible fainter filament toward compact galaxy to NW.&quot;  The galaxy is located in the northeast corner of Eridanus not far from Rigel.  This is likely a somewhat obscured region due to dust in our galaxy.  It's also too far south for good seeing from my location.<br />
<br />
This field is rather barren of other galaxies.  Nor do I see a certain candidate for interaction with Arp 187.  It might be that it is the result of a merger that has already happened.  The northern filament passes right by a possible candidate.  It's just right of the filament and appears like a slightly distorted star. It is the IR galaxy 2MASX J05045039-1013535.  Little information is available for it.  One note at NED says; &quot;Interacting with compact galaxy to the northwest?  Radio-source. M 05-10, 6 arcmin to the north.&quot;  Is this the galaxy the note refers to?  I don't see it being massive enough to have caused this much disruption if at the same distance.  It appears to me more likely it is far beyond it.  As to the radio source NED doesn't list it or show any source 6 minutes north of Arp 187.<br />
<br />
The obvious galaxy west and a tad south of Arp 187 is 2MASX J05044617-1015169, another IR galaxy with little information available.  <br />
<br />
The large galaxy near the top right of center is IC 401, an SB(rs)b? and possible LINER galaxy about 150 million light years distant.  Far too close to have anything to do with Arp 187.  There are a few other IR galaxies in the image but none with much information.<br />
<br />
14&quot; LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB 2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME<br />
<br />
Arp's image:<br />
<a href="http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Arp/Figures/big_arp187.jpeg" target="_blank">http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp187.jpeg</a><br />
<br />
14&quot; LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME<br />
<br />
I've included a 2x enlargement for what it is worth.<br />
<br />
Rick</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11247d1258596298-arp-187-arp-galaxy-lovers-only-arp187l4x10rgb2x10.jpg" target="_blank">ARP187L4X10RGB2X10.jpg</a> (139.6 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11248d1258596298-arp-187-arp-galaxy-lovers-only-arp187l4x10rgb2x10crop2x.jpg" target="_blank">ARP187L4X10RGB2X10crop2x.jpg</a> (101.1 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>RickJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96867-arp-187-arp-galaxy-lovers-only.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Orion Constellation in its natural environment</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96785-orion-constellation-its-natural-environment.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:28:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all

This image shows the Orion Constellation in its natural environment. It’s a widefield vista showing all the major components, including Betelgeuse, Rigel, the belt stars, M42, the Running Man, the Horsehead and the flame, parts of Barnards Loop and a faint display of IC 2118.

It’s only 35 minutes exposure, with no flats calibration, so it’s not as smooth as I’d hoped, but like all of my IISAC2009 images, it’s given me a glimmer of hope and something to aim for next time.

The image was taken at IISAC2009, on the Friday night when my USB hub was playing up and I couldn't control the camera from the laptop. I mounted my Canon 20D and my new 24-105mm L IS f/4.0 lens on top of my ED80 and pointed it at the Orion Constellation.

The exposures were guided through my 80mm refractor and the DMK21AU04, using PHD Guiding. The camera was controlled using the timer remote. The lens was at 47mm f/5.6, and each exposure was 5 minutes. Dark frame subtraction was done in-camera. 7 exposures @ ISO800, 35 minutes total data. No flats.

I'm really pleased with how the 24-105mm lens is performing - it's a definite keeper and will definitely make a return to this part of the sky in the future.

Blog Post - The Orion Constellation (http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/18/the-orion-constellation)

1200px wide version (http://www.mikesalway.com.au/download/32)

Thanks for looking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all<br />
<br />
This image shows the Orion Constellation in its natural environment. It’s a widefield vista showing all the major components, including Betelgeuse, Rigel, the belt stars, M42, the Running Man, the Horsehead and the flame, parts of Barnards Loop and a faint display of IC 2118.<br />
<br />
It’s only 35 minutes exposure, with no flats calibration, so it’s not as smooth as I’d hoped, but like all of my IISAC2009 images, it’s given me a glimmer of hope and something to aim for next time.<br />
<br />
The image was taken at IISAC2009, on the Friday night when my USB hub was playing up and I couldn't control the camera from the laptop. I mounted my Canon 20D and my new 24-105mm L IS f/4.0 lens on top of my ED80 and pointed it at the Orion Constellation.<br />
<br />
The exposures were guided through my 80mm refractor and the DMK21AU04, using PHD Guiding. The camera was controlled using the timer remote. The lens was at 47mm f/5.6, and each exposure was 5 minutes. Dark frame subtraction was done in-camera. 7 exposures @ ISO800, 35 minutes total data. No flats.<br />
<br />
I'm really pleased with how the 24-105mm lens is performing - it's a definite keeper and will definitely make a return to this part of the sky in the future.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/18/the-orion-constellation" target="_blank">Blog Post - The Orion Constellation</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mikesalway.com.au/download/32" target="_blank">1200px wide version</a><br />
<br />
Thanks for looking.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11241d1258486087-orion-constellation-its-natural-environment-20091016-orionwide-600px.jpg" target="_blank">20091016-orionwide-600px.jpg</a> (97.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>iceman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96785-orion-constellation-its-natural-environment.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>M31 quick and dirty at 10deg altitude</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96737-m31-quick-dirty-10deg-altitude.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I really wanted to capture a great image of the beautiful Andromeda Galaxy (M31) from IISAC2009, but everything conspired against me and it just didn’t work out the way I’d hoped.

With a host of problems, I only captured 15 minutes of data and no flats calibration. Despite all that, it’s my first image of M31 and even though it was only at 10deg altitude, it gives me some hope that I can capture a better image in future.

On the first night, I started capturing data but wasn’t happy with my framing so I started to change the composition, and then I had problems with guiding and clouds. On the second night the guiding problems continued to plague me, and once they were sorted out, I had issues with my USB hub which took quite a fall during the day when a big gust of wind blew my laptop hutch off the table. On the third night, clouds low in the North prevented any imaging of M31, so I turned the scope to something else.

So all I ended up with was 3 usable frames from the first night, with no flats calibration and an awkward composition.

The image was captured with my normal Deep Space Imaging equipment –  the unmodded Canon 350D with the ED80, riding on the EQ6 and guided with an 80mm refractor using my DMK21AU04 and PHD guiding.

Exposures were 5 minutes each, with dark frame subtraction in camera. 3 exposures @ ISO800, FL ~ 480mm, F/6.

Blog post - M31 The Andromeda Galaxy (http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/17/m31-the-andromeda-galaxy-from-iisac2009)

1200px wide version (http://www.mikesalway.com.au/download/31)

Thanks for looking.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I really wanted to capture a great image of the beautiful Andromeda Galaxy (M31) from IISAC2009, but everything conspired against me and it just didn’t work out the way I’d hoped.<br />
<br />
With a host of problems, I only captured 15 minutes of data and no flats calibration. Despite all that, it’s my first image of M31 and even though it was only at 10deg altitude, it gives me some hope that I can capture a better image in future.<br />
<br />
On the first night, I started capturing data but wasn’t happy with my framing so I started to change the composition, and then I had problems with guiding and clouds. On the second night the guiding problems continued to plague me, and once they were sorted out, I had issues with my USB hub which took quite a fall during the day when a big gust of wind blew my laptop hutch off the table. On the third night, clouds low in the North prevented any imaging of M31, so I turned the scope to something else.<br />
<br />
So all I ended up with was 3 usable frames from the first night, with no flats calibration and an awkward composition.<br />
<br />
The image was captured with my normal Deep Space Imaging equipment –  the unmodded Canon 350D with the ED80, riding on the EQ6 and guided with an 80mm refractor using my DMK21AU04 and PHD guiding.<br />
<br />
Exposures were 5 minutes each, with dark frame subtraction in camera. 3 exposures @ ISO800, FL ~ 480mm, F/6.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/17/m31-the-andromeda-galaxy-from-iisac2009" target="_blank">Blog post - M31 The Andromeda Galaxy</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.mikesalway.com.au/download/31" target="_blank">1200px wide version</a><br />
<br />
Thanks for looking.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11236d1258402441-m31-quick-dirty-10deg-altitude-20091015-m31-600px.jpg" target="_blank">20091015-m31-600px.jpg</a> (95.4 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>iceman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96737-m31-quick-dirty-10deg-altitude.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The M7 Open Star Cluster in Scorpius</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96711-m7-open-star-cluster-scorpius.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all

This image of M7 (Ptolemy's Cluster) was taken at IISAC2009, early on the Saturday night before it clouded over. The Milky Way was setting in the West, and I captured 50 minutes of data on this object before it set behind the mountain.

This image is my first real deep space (prime focus) image in some time (since January this year!!), so while it’s not in the league of Louie’s beautiful version of M7 that appeared on APOD last week (congrats Louie!), I’m reasonably happy with the image given the lack of data, no flats calibration and the guiding problems I was having at IISAC2009. It really needs to be much deeper and longer to get the golden star field of the Milky Way.

The image was captured with my normal Deep Space Imaging equipment –  the unmodded Canon 350D with the ED80, riding on the EQ6 and guided with an 80mm refractor using my DMK21AU04 and PHD guiding.

Exposures were 5 minutes each, with dark frame subtraction in camera. 10 exposures @ ISO800, FL ~ 480mm, F/6.

Larger version here:
The M7 Open Cluster in Scorpius (http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/16/the-m7-open-star-cluster-in-scorpius)

Thanks for looking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all<br />
<br />
This image of M7 (Ptolemy's Cluster) was taken at IISAC2009, early on the Saturday night before it clouded over. The Milky Way was setting in the West, and I captured 50 minutes of data on this object before it set behind the mountain.<br />
<br />
This image is my first real deep space (prime focus) image in some time (since January this year!!), so while it’s not in the league of Louie’s beautiful version of M7 that appeared on APOD last week (congrats Louie!), I’m reasonably happy with the image given the lack of data, no flats calibration and the guiding problems I was having at IISAC2009. It really needs to be much deeper and longer to get the golden star field of the Milky Way.<br />
<br />
The image was captured with my normal Deep Space Imaging equipment –  the unmodded Canon 350D with the ED80, riding on the EQ6 and guided with an 80mm refractor using my DMK21AU04 and PHD guiding.<br />
<br />
Exposures were 5 minutes each, with dark frame subtraction in camera. 10 exposures @ ISO800, FL ~ 480mm, F/6.<br />
<br />
Larger version here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2009/11/16/the-m7-open-star-cluster-in-scorpius" target="_blank">The M7 Open Cluster in Scorpius</a><br />
<br />
Thanks for looking.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11230d1258353886-m7-open-star-cluster-scorpius-20091016-m7-600px.jpg" target="_blank">20091016-m7-600px.jpg</a> (95.2 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>iceman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96711-m7-open-star-cluster-scorpius.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Film's Legacy - Cepheus / Cygnus]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96656-films-legacy-cepheus-cygnus.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Greetings astrophotographers. I recently started a new project called The
Legacy Project. This is the first of many in what may be the waning days of
film astrophotography (I hope not of course) and as one of its few remaining
practitioners will be taking special care in planning, processing and displaying
these images.

Description from my flickr page and link to image:

This image is the results of a 75 minute exposure on Kodak E200 transparency
film.

The Cygnus and Cepheus region rides high in the Summer and Autumn sky in the
heart of the northern Milky Way.

The camera and lens used for the image was a Pentax 67 medium format camera and
165mm f/2.8 lens stopped down to f/4.8. The camera was mounted to an equatorial
mounted telescope which tracked the stars by compensating for the Earth's
rotation.
Image: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2606/4104055220_b15f1611dc.jpg 

Lager image obtained here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/12598495@N08/4104055220/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Greetings astrophotographers. I recently started a new project called The<br />
Legacy Project. This is the first of many in what may be the waning days of<br />
film astrophotography (I hope not of course) and as one of its few remaining<br />
practitioners will be taking special care in planning, processing and displaying<br />
these images.<br />
<br />
Description from my flickr page and link to image:<br />
<br />
This image is the results of a 75 minute exposure on Kodak E200 transparency<br />
film.<br />
<br />
The Cygnus and Cepheus region rides high in the Summer and Autumn sky in the<br />
heart of the northern Milky Way.<br />
<br />
The camera and lens used for the image was a Pentax 67 medium format camera and<br />
165mm f/2.8 lens stopped down to f/4.8. The camera was mounted to an equatorial<br />
mounted telescope which tracked the stars by compensating for the Earth's<br />
rotation.<br />
<img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2606/4104055220_b15f1611dc.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Lager image obtained here: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12598495@N08/4104055220/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/12598495@N08/4104055220/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>nightfly</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96656-films-legacy-cepheus-cygnus.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>15/11/2009 - solar observation sketch</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96654-15-11-2009-solar-observation-sketch.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A great day today. Medium seeing and my god the solar disk full of phainomena.

I use CORONADO MAXSCOPE SM 60mm DOUBLE STACK 0.5A Ha to make my sketch today because this telescope gave to me the best solar details of all my telescopes. It`s a great solar piece.

So today we have.

Polar filaments at SOUTH. And Q.R.FILAMENTS reserved at the west side.

I count six chromospheric plages. And i see an A.R.Filament at the plage who is near to 1029.

1029 has great size. It`s giant and we wait to come closer to the center of the disk.

The hedgerow eruptive area prominence at NE upper of the AR 1029 is too much powerfull. Today has broken in three pieces.

Make a sketch with exactly of what i see.

So i present to you.

 SOLAR OBSERVATION 3D SKETCH Ha (http://www.myblog.gr/007/12057/SOLAR+OBSERVATION+SKETCH.html)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A great day today. Medium seeing and my god the solar disk full of phainomena.<br />
<br />
I use CORONADO MAXSCOPE SM 60mm DOUBLE STACK 0.5A Ha to make my sketch today because this telescope gave to me the best solar details of all my telescopes. It`s a great solar piece.<br />
<br />
So today we have.<br />
<br />
Polar filaments at SOUTH. And Q.R.FILAMENTS reserved at the west side.<br />
<br />
I count six chromospheric plages. And i see an A.R.Filament at the plage who is near to 1029.<br />
<br />
1029 has great size. It`s giant and we wait to come closer to the center of the disk.<br />
<br />
The hedgerow eruptive area prominence at NE upper of the AR 1029 is too much powerfull. Today has broken in three pieces.<br />
<br />
Make a sketch with exactly of what i see.<br />
<br />
So i present to you.<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.myblog.gr/007/12057/SOLAR+OBSERVATION+SKETCH.html" target="_blank">SOLAR OBSERVATION 3D SKETCH Ha</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>THEO-007</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96654-15-11-2009-solar-observation-sketch.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>14/11/2009 - solar observation</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96608-14-11-2009-solar-observation.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A great day today for me for two reasons. 

1) first we have sun here in athens after a long time. Heavy mist but i saw our great star.

2) we have the great return of the 1029.

So........

We have small but too much SOUTH polar filaments. This means power.

We have a great loop prominence over the AR 1029.Very beautiful.

And laste we have the great return of the active region 1029. Today i saw the first of her chromospheric faculaes.

Too much power over there at NE.

 SOLAR OBSERVATION IMAGES (http://www.myblog.gr/007/12056/ACTIVE+REGION+1029+RETURN.html)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>A great day today for me for two reasons. <br />
<br />
1) first we have sun here in athens after a long time. Heavy mist but i saw our great star.<br />
<br />
2) we have the great return of the 1029.<br />
<br />
So........<br />
<br />
We have small but too much SOUTH polar filaments. This means power.<br />
<br />
We have a great loop prominence over the AR 1029.Very beautiful.<br />
<br />
And laste we have the great return of the active region 1029. Today i saw the first of her chromospheric faculaes.<br />
<br />
Too much power over there at NE.<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.myblog.gr/007/12056/ACTIVE+REGION+1029+RETURN.html" target="_blank">SOLAR OBSERVATION IMAGES</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>THEO-007</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96608-14-11-2009-solar-observation.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NGC-1499, The California Nebula</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96457-ngc-1499-california-nebula.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Made Nov. 8.  Set up the Hap Griffin modified Canon 40D with 13nm Astronomik clip-in Ha filter and 200mm f/2.8L lens, side by side with the 80mm Stellarvue Nighthawk II guidescope with Orion SSAG and PHD on the CGE mount in my side yard.  This is twelve 270 second subs at 3200 iso, twelve darks and twelve flats stacked in DSS and processed in PhotoShop CS3:

Image: http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880California-Nebula.jpg </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Made Nov. 8.  Set up the Hap Griffin modified Canon 40D with 13nm Astronomik clip-in Ha filter and 200mm f/2.8L lens, side by side with the 80mm Stellarvue Nighthawk II guidescope with Orion SSAG and PHD on the CGE mount in my side yard.  This is twelve 270 second subs at 3200 iso, twelve darks and twelve flats stacked in DSS and processed in PhotoShop CS3:<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.cloudynights.com/photopost/data/500/24880California-Nebula.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>BlueTiger</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96457-ngc-1499-california-nebula.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sharpless 2–129 nebula in H-alpha: mosaico [field: 4,03° x 2,43°]]]></title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96400-sharpless-2-129-nebula-h-alpha-mosaico-field-4-03-x-2-43-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Great nebula located in the south-west part of Cepheus, 
with nicknamed the Flying Bat Nebula. 
Given the large size of the nebula was necessary 
prepare a mosaic composed of 4 shots with field 2.1° x 1.4°, 
done in four nights. 

For each shot were exposed 10 frames of 1800 seconds, 
for a total of 20 hours. 
Photo taken with Pentax SDUF II 400 / 4 + ccd Sbig ST-10XME 
+ filter H-alpha from Roman sky 
www.danilopivato.com 
Best regards, 

Danilo Pivato</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Great nebula located in the south-west part of Cepheus, <br />
with nicknamed the Flying Bat Nebula. <br />
Given the large size of the nebula was necessary <br />
prepare a mosaic composed of 4 shots with field 2.1° x 1.4°, <br />
done in four nights. <br />
<br />
For each shot were exposed 10 frames of 1800 seconds, <br />
for a total of 20 hours. <br />
Photo taken with Pentax SDUF II 400 / 4 + ccd Sbig ST-10XME <br />
+ filter H-alpha from Roman sky <br />
<a href="http://www.danilopivato.com" target="_blank">www.danilopivato.com</a> <br />
Best regards, <br />
<br />
Danilo Pivato</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>Danilo Pivato</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96400-sharpless-2-129-nebula-h-alpha-mosaico-field-4-03-x-2-43-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Run down by geostationary satellites</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96398-run-down-geostationary-satellites.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Arp 292, IC 575, or what is it like to be run over by a hoard of geostationary satellites?  This one is in the geostationary satellite belt as seen from my latitude.  Only by waiting for it to get low in the west could I move the belt's perspective such that it fell below the object.  But that put it down in lousy seeing.  Also it meant the star colors wouldn't align well as they are displaced by the prism effect of our atmosphere.  Blue moved so much during just a 10 minute frame I couldn't get it to align very well so stars have a blue fringe.  Another problem of viewing through our atmosphere.  A few trails can be seen above the main belt.  I tried to reduce them as much as possible but couldn't eliminate them completely.  I didn't try with those below Arp 292.  The trails squiggle back and forth thanks to our unsteady atmosphere.

Arp 292 is a very strange spiral galaxy.  It looks much like M104 seen a bit more edge on except the dust lane is skewed a bit from the plane of the disk carrying the spiral arms.  At the SE end it seems to suddenly curve down even more.  I don't see this in Arp's image, just a straight tilted dust lane.  The difference appears one of color.  Arp's rather monochromatic blue image does resemble my blue image quite closely.  When red and green are added the shape changes.  Compared to M104 it is much redder and the halo much bluer besides the tilted dust lane.

In any case it wasn't the dust lane that interested Arp.  He classes this under "Group Character: Wind effects.  I'm not sure what he's seeing here.  There is a large halo of stars around the main galaxy, again much like M104.  Though in this case it appears slightly offset to the southeast.  Maybe that's what he is referring to. I've attached my image of M104 reduced to how it would appear if at Arp 292's distance.  Notice the similarity.  Though its halo is more symmetrical than that of Arp 292.

Arp 292 is also known as IC 575, an SA pec spiral in Sextans.  Some sources consider the disk a ring.  Considering the viewing angle I'm not sure that's known for sure.  It's red shift puts it about 285 million light-years from us.  This puts it over 9 times further away than M104.  

While Arp classes it under "Group Character" those right around it are of unknown red shift so may not form a group.  The galaxy down and right is MCG -01-25-057, no red shift data.  The one above it is 2MASX J09543313-0650143 and the one down and to the left is PGC 1027592.  No redshift data on either.  

Going further away down below Arp 292 in the geostationary satellite mess is IC 0574 also at about the same distance as Arp 292 so we can say they are partners.  It is classed as SA0.  I find no red shift data on the other galaxies in the image.  The spiral to the NE (upper left) of Arp 292 is PGC 028586.  The one west and slightly north of Arp 292 with an orange core is 2MASX J09540184-0649353.  Directly above 292 at the top of the frame is APMUKS(BJ) B095203.23-062758.2.  The fuzzy comet like galaxy just below the geostationary satellite trails to the SW of Arp 292 is PGC 1026068.  Many other galaxies are cataloged but non carry any useful, to us, information so I'll stop here.

For those wondering where the RGB satellite trails went, all were in the background which when set to gray then vanished for the most part.  A couple can still can still be seen if you look closely.  With only 4 sub frames usable I didn't have enough for both good satellite rejection and good a good noise level so settled on a good noise level and left them in without trying to clone them out.

Arp's image, upside down from my image:
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Arp/Figures/big_arp292.jpeg

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Full image with less compression
http://www.spacebanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2683&stc=1

Rick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Arp 292, IC 575, or what is it like to be run over by a hoard of geostationary satellites?  This one is in the geostationary satellite belt as seen from my latitude.  Only by waiting for it to get low in the west could I move the belt's perspective such that it fell below the object.  But that put it down in lousy seeing.  Also it meant the star colors wouldn't align well as they are displaced by the prism effect of our atmosphere.  Blue moved so much during just a 10 minute frame I couldn't get it to align very well so stars have a blue fringe.  Another problem of viewing through our atmosphere.  A few trails can be seen above the main belt.  I tried to reduce them as much as possible but couldn't eliminate them completely.  I didn't try with those below Arp 292.  The trails squiggle back and forth thanks to our unsteady atmosphere.<br />
<br />
Arp 292 is a very strange spiral galaxy.  It looks much like M104 seen a bit more edge on except the dust lane is skewed a bit from the plane of the disk carrying the spiral arms.  At the SE end it seems to suddenly curve down even more.  I don't see this in Arp's image, just a straight tilted dust lane.  The difference appears one of color.  Arp's rather monochromatic blue image does resemble my blue image quite closely.  When red and green are added the shape changes.  Compared to M104 it is much redder and the halo much bluer besides the tilted dust lane.<br />
<br />
In any case it wasn't the dust lane that interested Arp.  He classes this under &quot;Group Character: Wind effects.  I'm not sure what he's seeing here.  There is a large halo of stars around the main galaxy, again much like M104.  Though in this case it appears slightly offset to the southeast.  Maybe that's what he is referring to. I've attached my image of M104 reduced to how it would appear if at Arp 292's distance.  Notice the similarity.  Though its halo is more symmetrical than that of Arp 292.<br />
<br />
Arp 292 is also known as IC 575, an SA pec spiral in Sextans.  Some sources consider the disk a ring.  Considering the viewing angle I'm not sure that's known for sure.  It's red shift puts it about 285 million light-years from us.  This puts it over 9 times further away than M104.  <br />
<br />
While Arp classes it under &quot;Group Character&quot; those right around it are of unknown red shift so may not form a group.  The galaxy down and right is MCG -01-25-057, no red shift data.  The one above it is 2MASX J09543313-0650143 and the one down and to the left is PGC 1027592.  No redshift data on either.  <br />
<br />
Going further away down below Arp 292 in the geostationary satellite mess is IC 0574 also at about the same distance as Arp 292 so we can say they are partners.  It is classed as SA0.  I find no red shift data on the other galaxies in the image.  The spiral to the NE (upper left) of Arp 292 is PGC 028586.  The one west and slightly north of Arp 292 with an orange core is 2MASX J09540184-0649353.  Directly above 292 at the top of the frame is APMUKS(BJ) B095203.23-062758.2.  The fuzzy comet like galaxy just below the geostationary satellite trails to the SW of Arp 292 is PGC 1026068.  Many other galaxies are cataloged but non carry any useful, to us, information so I'll stop here.<br />
<br />
For those wondering where the RGB satellite trails went, all were in the background which when set to gray then vanished for the most part.  A couple can still can still be seen if you look closely.  With only 4 sub frames usable I didn't have enough for both good satellite rejection and good a good noise level so settled on a good noise level and left them in without trying to clone them out.<br />
<br />
Arp's image, upside down from my image:<br />
<a href="http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Arp/Figures/big_arp292.jpeg" target="_blank">http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp292.jpeg</a><br />
<br />
14&quot; LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME<br />
<br />
Full image with less compression<br />
<a href="http://www.spacebanter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2683&amp;stc=1" target="_blank">http://www.spacebanter.com/attachmen...tid=2683&amp;stc=1</a><br />
<br />
Rick</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11219d1257885168-run-down-geostationary-satellites-arp292l4x10rgb2x10x3reginset-crop.jpg" target="_blank">ARP292L4X10RGB2X10X3REGinset-crop.jpg</a> (107.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>RickJ</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96398-run-down-geostationary-satellites.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mars on November 10th</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96367-mars-november-10th.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Here is an image of Mars that I took this morning. This is the first image where I used the ToUCam in optimized color mode, which disables the sharpening in the camera firmware, allowing for higher quality raw data.

Looks like a blue cloud on the terminator below the North Polar Cap.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here is an image of Mars that I took this morning. This is the first image where I used the ToUCam in optimized color mode, which disables the sharpening in the camera firmware, allowing for higher quality raw data.<br />
<br />
Looks like a blue cloud on the terminator below the North Polar Cap.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11218d1257878377-mars-november-10th-mars-11-10-2009-0435-meade-barlow-meade-extender-311fr.jpg" target="_blank">Mars 11-10-2009 0435 Meade Barlow Meade Extender 311fr.jpg</a> (20.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>Kyle Edwards</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96367-mars-november-10th.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ic 1396</title>
			<link>http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96345-ic-1396-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>First try with the Baader UHC-S Filter. Taken from my driveway. Scope is 190 mm Mak Newt, Camera is Rebel Mod. 15 x 400 iso 1600, plus 1x1000sec. Guided with ED80, PHD and a Starshoot 1. Skies were a rare 7 out of ten. Generally we are fogged or clouded out by 10 pm, but they held till the moon rose. I hope to have some fun with this filter this winter. Regards, always welcome comments and clear skies all. A larger version can be seen at 
http://www.astrophotogallery.org/showphoto.php/photo/4347</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>First try with the Baader UHC-S Filter. Taken from my driveway. Scope is 190 mm Mak Newt, Camera is Rebel Mod. 15 x 400 iso 1600, plus 1x1000sec. Guided with ED80, PHD and a Starshoot 1. Skies were a rare 7 out of ten. Generally we are fogged or clouded out by 10 pm, but they held till the moon rose. I hope to have some fun with this filter this winter. Regards, always welcome comments and clear skies all. A larger version can be seen at <br />
<a href="http://www.astrophotogallery.org/showphoto.php/photo/4347" target="_blank">http://www.astrophotogallery.org/sho...php/photo/4347</a></div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.bautforum.com/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.bautforum.com/attachments/astrophotography/11216d1257817027-ic-1396-ele_filtered8.jpg" target="_blank">ele_filtered8.jpg</a> (95.6 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/">Astrophotography</category>
			<dc:creator>Joshben</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bautforum.com/astrophotography/96345-ic-1396-a.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
