Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Fun-n-Games
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 06:20 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,544
Default Which weighs more?

A tonne of feathers, or a tonne of rocks?

I've only just realised that this old, old chestnut is quite a difficult question.

Any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 06:53 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,230
Default

Well, I got out my scales, I weighed a ton of rocks and then I weighed a ton of feathers. And you know what? They both weighed one ton. Imagine that!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 07:44 PM
toejam toejam is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,549
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Brak View Post
Well, I got out my scales, I weighed a ton of rocks and then I weighed a ton of feathers. And you know what? They both weighed one ton. Imagine that!
Was that a ton? or a tonne? or a short ton?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 07:50 PM
Frog march's Avatar
Frog march Frog march is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 4,056
Default

I remember an old thread with this in, and the complexity involves buoyancy, so the answer is the most dense weighs more, probably the rocks I guess.
__________________
Brian's mother: He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 08:10 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,230
Default

Quote:
Was that a ton? or a tonne? or a short ton?
It's quite simple really. We are discussing the weight of feathers. So what has feathers? The answer is simple, a duck. So if the rocks weigh as much as a duck, it's a ton.

Or you could just use the metric system. If you're lazy.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-January-2008, 08:57 PM
chrissy's Avatar
chrissy chrissy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: co.durham.england
Posts: 10,497
Send a message via Yahoo to chrissy
Default

not difficult they weigh the same a tonne.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas,average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. Admiral Hyman Rickover.USN.

"Make the most of every day like it could be your last and enjoy each others company as this will make good memories for when we pass". chrissy

*A rock is for life not just for throwing*
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2008, 09:08 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,544
Default

I think one valid answer may, paradoxically, be the feathers.
Remember that the units for mass and weight are often the same.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2008, 10:16 AM
Frog march's Avatar
Frog march Frog march is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 4,056
Default

wouldn't the 1 tonne mass of feathers have more buoyancy(in air), than the 1 tonne mass of stones, therefore weighing less?
__________________
Brian's mother: He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2008, 10:44 AM
sirius0's Avatar
sirius0 sirius0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Australia, Central Victoria
Posts: 300
Default

What weighs more? A 10,000 size chicken (who once had feathers; apparently someone has been going around shaving birds to get a tonne of them for research or something) or a ton (metric) of bricks?
__________________
When the chips are down; put them in a bowl and share them around!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2008, 11:13 AM
mahesh's Avatar
mahesh mahesh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lat 51.50n long 0.05w
Posts: 4,709
Send a message via Yahoo to mahesh
Default

A ton is one hundred runs in cricket and carries a lot more in the record books! so there! ducky!
__________________
clear skies
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 28-January-2008, 12:50 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,544
Default

A tonne (in mass) of rocks on Mars would weigh less.
There are no tonnes of feathers on Mars, or anywhere else in the Solar system. So on average a tonne of rocks would weigh less.
But I don't know what the average weight of rocks in the universe is (note the traditional question asks about weight and rocks, not mass and rock...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
muscle weighs more than fat? 3dknight General Science 14 02-December-2007 01:14 PM
Walker Texas Ranger weighs in on evolution soylentgreen Off-Topic Babbling 2 26-October-2006 10:55 AM
James McCanney weighs in on Sedna Lycus Against the Mainstream 32 24-March-2004 02:19 AM
The Western Australian weighs in JayUtah Conspiracy Theories 6 20-March-2003 05:49 PM
Scientific American weighs in The Bad Astronomer Conspiracy Theories 9 14-January-2003 04:05 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today