Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > General Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 17-August-2005, 06:10 PM
buzzlightbeer buzzlightbeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 155
Default

an international collaboration of particle physicists has made new measurements that shed more light on the weak force, which is responsible for radioactive beta-decay.

The results, which agree with the Standard Model, show that the strength of the weak force acting on two electrons lessens when the electrons are far apart

article
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20-August-2005, 06:13 PM
cran's Avatar
cran cran is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goomalling, Western Australia
Posts: 1,368
Default

okay... chalk one up for the Standard Model
__________________
Quote:
"I don't know...I'm making it up as I go along!" ...Dr I. Jones

"...and your wise men don't know how it fee-e-e-eels...
to be thick as a brick..." J. Tull

"Nature abhors perfection... cats abhor a vacuum!"

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-November-2005, 08:49 AM
jkmccrann jkmccrann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,291
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzlightbeer
an international collaboration of particle physicists has made new measurements that shed more light on the weak force, which is responsible for radioactive beta-decay.

The results, which agree with the Standard Model, show that the strength of the weak force acting on two electrons lessens when the electrons are far apart

article
Well surely that makes logical sense? If it was the other way around, wouldn't things be a little chaotic?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-November-2005, 09:32 AM
devilmech devilmech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkmccrann
Well surely that makes logical sense? If it was the other way around, wouldn't things be a little chaotic?
It's been hypothesized for quite a while, almost since the weak force was discovered, but only now has it been show to be true through observation. Chalk one up for science =)
__________________
The visions we present to our children shape the future. It matters what those visions are. Often they become self-fulfilling prophecies. - Carl Sagan, 1992
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-November-2005, 10:19 PM
Eta C's Avatar
Eta C Eta C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heart of Darkness
Posts: 1,596
Default

The problem in doing this measurement is that the weak force is, well, weak. Interactions between electrons are dominated by their electrical charge and the EM force. It's a very tricky experiment to isolate the part of the interaction carried by the weak force. Plenty of experiments have been done that validate the weak force's behavior in neutrino interactions, but then neutrinos only interact via the weak force which is why they interact so seldom. This experiment, while giving the expected result, was one that had to be done. After all, scientists don't take it as a matter of faith that the weak force should operate the same way for electrons as it does for neutrinos.

There is a force that gets stronger as the distance increases. The color force between quarks is weak close in, but grows in strength as the distance increases. This is partly due to the fact that the force carriers (gluons) also carry the color charge (as opposed to photons, which are electrically neutral). The weakening of the force at short distances is referred to as asymptotic freedom and was the subject of the 2004 Nobel in physics.
__________________
"I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind." - William Thompson, 1st Baron Lord Kelvin

"If it was so, it might be, and if it were so, it would be, but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!" - Tweedledee

This isn't right. This isn't even wrong. - Wolfgang Pauli
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-November-2005, 09:45 AM
Ken G's Avatar
Ken G Ken G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,562
Default

There is an even more common force that increases with distance-- the spring force, or any force that arises from a harmonic potential. OK, that's cheating, it's not a particle force, though it certainly is a familiar force in macroscopic contexts. Note that none of these forces can increase for all distances, as jkmccrann points out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today