First pyramid found in Europe. Quite extraordinary

PHOTO:
http://www.bosnianpyramid.com/

STORY:
http://www.cp.org/english/online/ful.../g112920A.html

You're ToSeeked somewhere (I think in Babbling).

Looks an awful lot like a hill to me. They'll need firm evidence to prove this is a hill shaped into a pyramid and not a pyramid shaped hill.

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

This does look like evidence to me

__________________
An emperor without enemies, a king without a kingdom, supported in life by the willing tribute of a free people.

I am willing to believe there's a pyramid there. But with the tiny and unclear images on that site I can't tell for myself, and I can't read the reports.

They claim to have found hundreds of meters of straight walled and 90° splitting tunnels, which would indeed prove (to large extent) a manmade structure. But with tiny unclear photos (in which I hardly can recognize a tunnel) we've got very little more than stories to judge from. Same goes from the stone pictures: I can't see whether they're manmade, how they are positioned on the hill etcetc.

Finding archealogical itmes on that hill (like the ball or what is it on the photo) also does not prove that the hill is man made or severely altered by men. It is known that people used to live around that hill/pyramid in the past. We need clear evidence that the hill has been altered.

I'm waiting for clear imagery, clear reports and the like of the tunnels, stairs, stone cover etcetc.

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

There are pyramids are nearly every continent on earth, why can't Bosnia have one?

__________________
-The Wolf
http://www.ryanmercer.com
http://www.crayonsforjesus.com

Of course they can have one. What needs to be proven is whether they have one.

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

I think this is mostly bogus;
Mr Osmanagic seems to think that this pyramid is 12000 years old.
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com...s.php?id=53968
I think this is extremely unlikely, and this dating makes the rest of his research look shaky.

__________________
Orion's Arm . The Starlark . Voices: Future Tense . OA Flickr set

How much you guys want to bet that Hoagland stumbles across this page and includes it in his site?

27000 years ago, what kind of temple are we talking about here?

I really need CLEAR info on the tunnels and the like before I am convinced. Too bad if he's not lying, but this approach makes it so suspicoous. If you found 200 meters of tunnels, do spend more than 180*180 pixels on it!

That said, I'm really interested in the findings of a professional research of this site.

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

Hum,
i guess that there were only 100 or so people that were living in that part of Europe during the end of the ice age. So given the size of it, and lack of any evidence supporting the theory i would be surprised if anybody took it seriously.

Perhaps, if you put it on E-bay someone would buy it.

What's in the tunnels?

An atmospheric substance called air, and a quite fuggy variant on that, is my guess .

He claims to have explored 200m of tunnels and stopped where there was a T split. There are "stories" of children entering the small pyramid tunnels and coming out on top of the large one on the other side of the river. Perfectly dry tunnels underneath a river after 12000 years - amazing...

__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name.

A more recent CBS News article.

""No fast conclusions, please. The evidence has to be firm, at least beyond a reasonable doubt," he said."

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill

The oldest city known is Çatalhöyük in Turkey, which is 8000 to 9000 years old.
http://www.focusmm.com/civcty/cathyk00.htm
http://www.smm.org/catal/introduction/
This supposed pyramid would need to be three thousand years earlier, during the Palaeolithic period.
Not a chance.

__________________
Orion's Arm . The Starlark . Voices: Future Tense . OA Flickr set

One thing to remember here is that it's entierly possible for the pyranid to me manmade without being from the time he's talking about.
Another possibility is that it's an essentially natural hill that's been shaped and faced.
More archaeology is needed to answer which and when and to me it looks like some of the sillier claims is made to raise the money for that.

__________________
An emperor without enemies, a king without a kingdom, supported in life by the willing tribute of a free people.

Hum,
yeah,
From the CBS article - "The hill was already there, some ancient civilization just shaped it and then coated it with this primitive concrete _ and there you have a pyramid."

Which would be quite possible during the Bronze Age onwards - as that was the time of wide spread hill fortification.

A prime example of Bad Archaeology, it seems to me.

__________________
Orion's Arm . The Starlark . Voices: Future Tense . OA Flickr set

Hey , people

no he does not think that, he said in a interview that pyramid is minimum 3000 old

3000 years is a little more realistic, although why has Osmanagic ever mentioned these ridiculous 12000 and 27000 year estimates at all?
These links quote him as giving those dates
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com...s.php?id=53968
http://sciencepolitics.blogspot.com/...bosnia_07.html
Now it is certainly possible that someone has misquoted him, and mixed the dates up; then the Internet has picked up and repeated the mistake. I would think it pretty strange if Osmanagic really said this in the first place, as it seems to imply that the sun temple was built 27000 years ago on top of a 12000 year old pyramid (not a bad trick).
But if he is going for a relatively sober 3000 b.p. date then it seems not impossible after all.

If this is an artificial mound it is considerably larger than the previous holder of the 'largest mound in Europe' title, Silbury Hill in Wiltshire.
http://www.stonepages.com/england/silburyhill.html
Silbury hill is 4000 years old, but only 130 feet high as opposed to 700 metres.

__________________
Orion's Arm . The Starlark . Voices: Future Tense . OA Flickr set

exactly exactly




bosnian pyramid is not a mound, it is a stone building, there is a stone buidling uder the hill



this is not truth, osmangich said that it is not truth, someone has misquoted him

the truth is there is a stone construction under the hill