Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > General Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16-January-2008, 11:29 PM
vonmazur's Avatar
vonmazur vonmazur is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 596
Smile Transparent Materials and Light...

Could someone with the knowledge help me to figure out to answer a local woo woo about this????

He has a belief that somehow, the passage of light thru transparent materials, proves Relativity is wrong....He thinks that the light slows down, and this is proof...of something. I told him that light goes thru and if not absorbed, continues to travel at lilght speed. He also believes in something called "slow glass" that was invented/discovered in the middle ages in Europe, and is now some kind of forbidden technology. Supposedly the glass would transmit the image with a delay of time....useful for spying on subjects etc....

I have heard of supposed photographs made in the 17th century, but never seen any proof, maybe he is confused about the supposed nature of this glass. According to the conspiratorial crowd, the Masons have a photo of Shakespeare (Shieks Pir-according to one of them...) that was made with a pin hole camera and a plate of silver in the Bard's time....Has any one here heard about this particular woo woo idea???

Dale in Alabama
__________________
"Ad astra per aspera"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 12:29 AM
G O R T's Avatar
G O R T G O R T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 232
Default

The term slow glass comes from a science fiction book called The light of other days.

Light is slowed within transparent material by slowing the absorbtion/reemission time of individual encounters with atoms. This is the refractive index. Light in a vacuum (between atoms) always travels at c.
__________________
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" - George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 12:41 AM
mr obvious mr obvious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 656
Default

If you really want to blow his mind, you can look up various articles where people have used exotics (Bose-Einstein Condensates, if I'm not mistaken) to slow down and even virtually stop light. They have also managed, by using light pulses, to 'store' the light information and then release it at a desired later time by using a secondary excitation source. Finally, for relatively simple signals, they have managed to propel some of the signals faster than light (not through a vacuum).

But GORT has the right general idea - light does slow down in a material with a different (higher) index of refraction as the initial propelling medium. What this has to do with photographing Shakespeare is perhaps much ado about nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 01:00 AM
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ashby, MN, USA
Posts: 2,581
Default

i saw a show on the History Channel about how some people think that the Shroud of Turin is actually a photograph made by Leonardo DaVinci by using simple technology that was available in his time- the reason the head seems to be too "large" for the body is because it was likely photographed separately onto the same cloth that the body was photographed onto.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 02:13 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
i saw a show on the History Channel about how some people think that the Shroud of Turin is actually a photograph made by Leonardo DaVinci by using simple technology that was available in his time- the reason the head seems to be too "large" for the body is because it was likely photographed separately onto the same cloth that the body was photographed onto.
Yeesh, like that one hasn't been busted again and again.

The only place I've ever heard the term "slow glass" is here:
http://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/tymesandson.htm
--describing a comic book story.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 10:19 AM
JohnD JohnD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,519
Default

vm,
He's right - and this is the basis of optics and refraction.
See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/educat...ion2_rev.shtml
But you are right too, in that light continues at its original speed when it leaves the translucent substance.

AS for 'slow glass', this is an imaginary concept, used and re-used in fiction and fable, like many others because they reflect powerful human wishes and desires. EG poisons that simulate death (Romeo & Juliet, Rip Van Winkle), the hidden heir revealed (Moses, Aragorn), identical twins (Comedy of Errors, Count of Monte Christo). Rather better known SF authors have used 'slow glass' such as Robert Shaw and Arthur C.Clarke. The very words "slow glass" have a pleasing assonance that have lead to them being used by artists in photography and film, and it is the name of a fishing fly! Try Googling for them!

John
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 10:46 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,485
Default

An individual photon never travels slower than the speed of light in a vacuum. What is happening in a medium is, the photons are being absorbed and then reemitted. This process takes time, so what we percieve as a beam of light slows down, but the actual light itself in its short jumps never travels slower than the speed of light in a vacuum.

This is what G.O.R.T. said, I just thought it might be helpful to expand on it a little.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17-January-2008, 07:50 PM
vonmazur's Avatar
vonmazur vonmazur is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 596
Default

Thanks for the replies, I think I can explain to him now....and now I remember the SciFi story about the glass and the shroud photo show....

Dale
__________________
"Ad astra per aspera"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The speed of light in materials Astrowannabe Questions and Answers 54 25-October-2006 12:02 AM
Potential Threat to the Huygen Mission Jerry Against the Mainstream 1952 01-May-2005 05:33 AM
We didn't land on the Moon BigJim Conspiracy Theories 96 27-May-2004 05:12 PM
What's Wrong with the Big Bang?? Tim Thompson Against the Mainstream 186 11-January-2003 03:21 AM
magnetic rocket creates wormhole theory uralph Against the Mainstream 9 15-June-2002 01:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today