Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > General Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-February-2008, 07:46 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Well... I'm not happy about string theory, and i don't study it.
Maybe that's why you're not happy about it; maybe you don't know enough.

Now, I'm not saying that's necessarily true; I don't really know anything about string theory myself, and I don't think I'd understand it if I studied more. It's way over my head. But I don't think you get to complain about how wrong an idea is if you don't know what it is you're complaining about. And yet it seems to happen all the time . . . .
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-February-2008, 11:15 PM
Ken G's Avatar
Ken G Ken G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Well... I'm not happy about string theory, and i don't study it.
Right-- does that not prove the opposite of what you were claiming? You claimed that people don't continue to study something they are happy with, and I was arguing the inverse. Our liking of the Big Bang theory doesn't cause us to avoid confronting it, we confront it constantly because we like it-- we like dealing with it, using it, testing it, kicking its tires, etc. It's basically a complete lie that the scientific community resists challenges to its paradigms-- it loves its paradigms and loves supporting them, but it also loves it when they are challenged and loves replacing them when it has good enough occasion to do so. You might say that the history of science has been one of loving its theories to death.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 09:13 AM
Occams Ghost Occams Ghost is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 449
Default

Oh i don't know... the way physicists are talking at the moment, strin theory will be dead within a decade.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 09:44 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
Oh i don't know... the way physicists are talking at the moment, strin theory will be dead within a decade.
If you don't study it, how do you know? Besides, it depends on which physicists you're talking about/to.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 09:49 AM
Occams Ghost Occams Ghost is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 449
Default

I talk to Dr. Fred Wolf... and he is certainly against string theory.

Then you hear about the major guy's like Sheldon Glashow. The very fact nothing experimental can arise from string theory, it is an unfalsifiable theory.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 09:51 AM
Occams Ghost Occams Ghost is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 449
Default

''If you don't study it, how do you know?''


Because it is ridiculous how it goes. Tiny vibrating and closed strings in an 11, maybe 12 to 26 dimensional space and time? Considering we see only three dimensions, something about it seems wrong. Terribly wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 10:08 AM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
''If you don't study it, how do you know?''


Because it is ridiculous how it goes. Tiny vibrating and closed strings in an 11, maybe 12 to 26 dimensional space and time? Considering we see only three dimensions, something about it seems wrong. Terribly wrong.
You dismiss it prior to studying it or researching it?

If scientists did that, we would have very few working models.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 10:44 AM
Occams Ghost Occams Ghost is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 449
Default

Define a working model, because string theory cetainly isn't one.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 05:41 PM
Sp1ke's Avatar
Sp1ke Sp1ke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Posts: 597
Default

I'm not sure pursuing this line of discussion is useful, OG, but I'd reply to your question with "Why is string theory not a working model?"

I bet there are plenty of researchers out there who still think it works. OK, it's not complete or perfect. It might turn out to be a dud. There probably will be a better theory coming along some time soon. But if scientists did their research based on "Ooh I don't think that looks very pretty and its got some problems, lets forget about it", I don't think we'd have progressed very far.
__________________
Spike
:)
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 07:59 PM
tdvance's Avatar
tdvance tdvance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 2,502
Default

As far as I know, string theory is a working model--consistent with observations. The problem with string theory is so much observation is input, rather than output, of the theory, just like with the epicycles--so many input parameters to string theory, some suspect it could be made to fit just about anything. To actually test it, it must predict things not predicted by other theories, things that can be tested. The only thing I've heard so far is that the Large Hadron Collider should produce mini black holes under String Theory but not under the Standard Model, so that would be the first likely test in the near future.
__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 12-February-2008, 09:06 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Are you saying that string theory is very... tangled?

It ties you up in knots?
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2008, 11:00 PM
Swift's Avatar
Swift Swift is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
Posts: 12,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Occams Ghost View Post
I talk to Dr. Fred Wolf... and he is certainly against string theory.

Then you hear about the major guy's like Sheldon Glashow. The very fact nothing experimental can arise from string theory, it is an unfalsifiable theory.
Fraser has discussed one idea for testing String Theory on the UT website
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009
All moderation in purple
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Wants Your Opinion on the Lunar Lander Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 8 17-January-2008 05:34 PM
Why we love Astronomy (an opinion) William_Thompson Astronomy 17 02-October-2005 07:57 AM
Opinion Request for Quantum Mechanics Maddad Astronomy 9 04-June-2005 10:49 PM
ETUFO's - Your opinion... what are the chances? HankSolo Against the Mainstream 407 20-October-2003 10:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today