From here.

So...that is pretty invalid as science - but a pretty cool psychedelic trip!


And : STOP YELLING !

__________________
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" - George Santayana

Behold the healing power of word salad! I just hope that the next time I go to a hospital I don't hear the doctor saying this:

This Gariev sounds like some real Grade-AAA woo. Nothing to see here, call in the bunko squad if he tries to sell anything.

__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it.

The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high.

Ugh. Unless someone is a genuine polymath, no matter how smart they are they really should take a degree in the other subject they're prattling on about. In this case, he happens to hit two areas that I do know something about: Linguisitcs and biology.

He starts with a cheery little supposition: "These wave approaches all require that the fundamental property of the chromosome apparatus is the nonlocality of the genetic information". Right there we can go "WRONG!" because genetic information is specific to a locality. You only find the FoxP gene in a certain location and not spread all over the place.

His work is filled with nonsense sentences : "... the ability of the chromosome to gyrate the polarization plane of its own radiated and occluded photons " Chromosomes aren't bioluminescent, and inside the body they don't "gyrate" so that your radiated and occluded photons are aligned.

And he never says how he measures this,though he swears it happens when he passes a laser beam through a Mysterious Substance (he never names it) when it's sitting on a glass slide. Anyone who's studied physics and optics isn't surprised by this, because light bends or bounces when it hits things.

He tosses in a lot of important sounding words that seem good until you try to tear them apart and ask "what is he saying?" For instance, take that sentence above and let's ask the obvious questions that any scientist would -- like do chromosomes gyrate? How do they gyrate? Do we have slides or movies of them gyrating? Is it up and down or around and around? How is this different from their ordianry movement in cell division? How many cells did he track (alive) to watch the chromosomes and does he have any movies of them gyrating around? How do you know what the polarization plane is? Does each strand have its own polarization plane? ...etc, etc.

The more we look and look into those obvious questions, the more we see that this seems to resemble one of those Thrilling Tabloid Articles from Pravda (where they make it all up) rather than any real scientific research.

I could go on and on about the linguistics, too. Trust me... it's in equally shabby shape.