Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > General Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 04:55 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkepticJ View Post
You're just confusing the issue with facts. What we really need to do is go with our gut-feeling.
The Truthiness shall prevail! (I know in my heart it will!)
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 11-April-2008, 12:50 PM
jhwegener jhwegener is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 260
Default

[quote=parallaxicality;1206328]There is a movement growing among the followers of Richard Dawkins and his ilk that is closely tied to the "selfish gene" idea and their attempt to bypass religion; its core belief is that everything, morality, aesthetics, ideology, ultimately has a scientific basis.
Since history is really just the collective result of billions of individuals acting according to their impulses, if their actions could be predicted based on their prospective evolutionary advantage, then history, by definition, is predictable, which means history is a science.

[quote]
This form of "historical science" has a long history itself, but attempts to give "historical laws" and predictable history has made questionable results. It seems doubtfull wether Dawkins followers can make any positive contribution, though a dialogue between biologists and historians perhaps could benefit both.
In addition: not even evolution seems to follow very predictable patterns, and even the term "selfish gene" is questionable (what is really meant? )
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conciousness and cutting a brain in half, what would happen? Ross PK81 General Science 368 14-April-2008 05:55 PM
Planck regime - GR and QM incompatibility? Nereid Questions and Answers 102 06-January-2007 04:28 PM
Bad Science on History Channel--again jgravatt Small Media at Large 36 09-September-2005 02:02 PM
UFO Files: More BA (and Science) on the History Channel Maksutov Small Media at Large 11 07-July-2004 07:38 AM
Astrophyiscs, Creationism & the age of the Universe Tim Thompson Against the Mainstream 198 15-October-2002 05:10 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today