|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello everyone. I would like son input on this thought.
BEFORE THE BIG BANG. There is ample evidence that around 13.7 billion years ago the universe that we now view and explore became visible. We know that it was initially very hot and has now cooled to minus 454 degrees Fahrenheit as discovered by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. We also know that the presences of the light elements of Hydrogen and Helium support the concept of a big bang or at least an expansion of material. The material (galaxies) are moving away from us as discovered by Edwin Hubble and this indicates that they were all together at a central place at the beginning. (Hubbard’ Law.) Therefore it is reasonably certain that the universe had a beginning at a central point. The current standard Theory is that it started with a “Singularity”, thought to be an extremely hot, extremely dense and extremely small area that explosively began to expand and create the universe as we currently see it. This appears to be the view of Steven Hawkings as stated in an article published in the Royal Society magazine. This expansion “created” Time, Motion, Gravity, Pressure, Light, Radiation , Space and Material.. This concept of “Singularities” violate several basic physic principles. 1st. If it was hot before it expanded, it had to be moving, then Time existed then.. Time is the interval between events. That interval can be extremely brief and moving implies events are taking place. 2nd. The concept that the entire material content of the visible universe came from a single small ball of hot, dense “something” not only violates the law of the conservation of matter, but also that of common sense. You don’t make something from nothing and nothing, other than the singularity, was thought to be the only condition there. 3rd. If there were no Space at that beginning, just where was this “Singularity” located? 4th. If there was no Gravity at the beginning, just what held the “Singularity together so densely? A more reasonable hypothesis based on sound physical laws would suggest that before the big bang that there was no light, no heat, no motion, no space, no gravity and no time. That doesn’t suggest that there wasn’t anything there. A sub-sub atomic particle, which I call a unipole, occupied the entire existence, packed densely without beginning and without end in all directions. This is a concept that is hard to get your mind around. Particles packed so tightly there is no Space but without pressure. Particles at absolute zero have no Motion therefore no Time These particles were at rest and therefore no Gravity was present. There was no Heat. Totally Cold. There was no Light.. Totally Black. This is the nature of existence. This is the nature of reality. This is the nature of nature This is the nature of God. I say it’s like God because it always existed and always will. Sans beginning and sans end. No god maker or particle maker involved. Approximately 13.7 billion years ago, for some reason, two unipoles merged together and formed a dipole, releasing heat, motion and causing a chain reaction throughout the surrounding unipoles thus changing them into Hawkings “singularity.“, having gathered densely together by the intense gravity that the dipoles generated. This initial reaction was not 100% complete as unipole clusters still remain and are regarded as “Dark Matter” and are apparently not affected by gravity. Probably because of their singular polarity. That chain reaction still continues on the frontier of the expanding space and has long since retreated from our visible range. It leaves behind vast amounts of hot dense material and its gravity is causing the remnants (galaxies) to expand outward at an increasing rate of speed. It is also the source of the “Dark Energy” that is postulated to be present. We have two important facts that indicate that it is continuing. Our known visible Universe is expanding at an increasing rate. We record unknown radiation from invisible parts of space. (out of range of our best light telescopes.) After the initial reaction, the evolution to quarks, proton, atom, the periodic table, stars, galaxies, planets, life, Ipods and TV screens began. What other wonders will they produce for us? I have not used the word creation in this manuscript because the process was one of pure physics. Matter was not created nor destroyed but only changed in form. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BBT breaks physical laws according to YEC | pbethala | Against the Mainstream | 14 | 09-April-2008 06:19 AM |
| CTRL-V Game | kucharek | Fun-n-Games | 152 | 08-June-2006 03:01 PM |
| Cutting the Cord on the Big Bang | Jerry | Against the Mainstream | 92 | 28-December-2004 09:38 AM |
| Big Bang Refuted? | BrianStewart | Against the Mainstream | 361 | 12-December-2004 04:31 AM |
| Help - Big Bang | Moccomouse | Astronomy | 12 | 02-August-2003 05:42 AM |