Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > General Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 03:29 PM
SUMTHOT SUMTHOT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Default Before the Big Bang

Hello everyone. I would like son input on this thought.
BEFORE THE BIG BANG.

There is ample evidence that around 13.7 billion years ago the universe that we now view and explore became visible.
We know that it was initially very hot and has now cooled to minus 454 degrees Fahrenheit as discovered by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. We also know that the presences of the light elements of Hydrogen and Helium support the concept of a big bang or at least an expansion of material.
The material (galaxies) are moving away from us as discovered by Edwin Hubble and this indicates that they were all together at a central place at the beginning. (Hubbard’ Law.)
Therefore it is reasonably certain that the universe had a beginning at a central point.

The current standard Theory is that it started with a “Singularity”, thought to be an
extremely hot, extremely dense and extremely small area that explosively began to expand and create the universe as we currently see it. This appears to be the view of Steven Hawkings as stated in an article published in the Royal Society magazine.

This expansion “created” Time, Motion, Gravity, Pressure, Light, Radiation , Space and Material..

This concept of “Singularities” violate several basic physic principles.

1st. If it was hot before it expanded, it had to be moving, then Time existed then..
Time is the interval between events. That interval can be extremely brief and moving implies events are taking place.

2nd. The concept that the entire material content of the visible universe came from a single small ball of hot, dense “something” not only violates the law of the conservation of matter, but also that of common sense. You don’t make something from nothing and nothing, other than the singularity, was thought to be the only condition there.

3rd. If there were no Space at that beginning, just where was this “Singularity” located?

4th. If there was no Gravity at the beginning, just what held the “Singularity together so densely?

A more reasonable hypothesis based on sound physical laws would suggest that before the big bang that there was no light, no heat, no motion, no space, no gravity and no time.
That doesn’t suggest that there wasn’t anything there.
A sub-sub atomic particle, which I call a unipole, occupied the entire existence, packed densely without beginning and without end in all directions.
This is a concept that is hard to get your mind around.
Particles packed so tightly there is no Space but without pressure.
Particles at absolute zero have no Motion therefore no Time
These particles were at rest and therefore no Gravity was present.
There was no Heat. Totally Cold.
There was no Light.. Totally Black.
This is the nature of existence.
This is the nature of reality.
This is the nature of nature
This is the nature of God.
I say it’s like God because it always existed and always will. Sans beginning and sans end. No god maker or particle maker involved.

Approximately 13.7 billion years ago, for some reason, two unipoles merged together and formed a dipole, releasing heat, motion and causing a chain reaction throughout the surrounding unipoles thus changing them into Hawkings “singularity.“, having gathered densely together by the intense gravity that the dipoles generated.

This initial reaction was not 100% complete as unipole clusters still remain and are regarded as “Dark Matter” and are apparently not affected by gravity. Probably because of their singular polarity.
That chain reaction still continues on the frontier of the expanding space and has long since retreated from our visible range. It leaves behind vast amounts of hot dense material and its gravity is causing the remnants (galaxies) to expand outward at an increasing rate of speed.
It is also the source of the “Dark Energy” that is postulated to be present.
We have two important facts that indicate that it is continuing.
Our known visible Universe is expanding at an increasing rate.
We record unknown radiation from invisible parts of space. (out of range of our best light telescopes.)
After the initial reaction, the evolution to quarks, proton, atom, the periodic table, stars, galaxies, planets, life, Ipods and TV screens began. What other wonders will they produce for us?

I have not used the word creation in this manuscript because the process was one of pure physics. Matter was not created nor destroyed but only changed in form.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 04:23 PM
antoniseb's Avatar
antoniseb antoniseb is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Irvine CA
Posts: 14,839
Default

Hi SUMTHOT,

Welcome to the BAUT forum. I've closed this thread for several reasons. One is that there is some religious content here (against rule 14). Also, you are discussing ATM topics in the mainstream section of the thread.
__________________
Forming opinions as we speak
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBT breaks physical laws according to YEC pbethala Against the Mainstream 14 09-April-2008 05:19 AM
CTRL-V Game kucharek Fun-n-Games 152 08-June-2006 02:01 PM
Cutting the Cord on the Big Bang Jerry Against the Mainstream 92 28-December-2004 08:38 AM
Big Bang Refuted? BrianStewart Against the Mainstream 361 12-December-2004 03:31 AM
Help - Big Bang Moccomouse Astronomy 12 02-August-2003 04:42 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today