|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4133668.ece
I'm certain I've seen a thread on this before, but I can't find it. Should be interesting to see what comes of this, if anything.
__________________
Spock Jenkins of the Vulcan Jenkins'. |
|
|||
|
The catch is scaling up the operation so that it can produce enough fuel to be useful on a national (US) level. Apparently you'd need a plant the size of Chicago to service US consumption.
Still its a brilliant start. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day. T. Anderson |
|
|||
|
The bacteria are going to get out and take over our country and turn all the farm land into oil and we won't have any food or water because the oil will contaminate the water and the bacteria will eat the food! AAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!
Let me get Crichton on the phone...
__________________
Spock Jenkins of the Vulcan Jenkins'. |
|
|||
|
I think the catch is that you are still dependant on the energy contained in the feedstock and growing plant material to feed the bacteria is still going to be a relatively inefficient process. They mention that the process is very much like ethanol production, but more efficient because they don’t need to distill the final process.
I suspect bio diesel from algae will prove superior because the algae absorbs sunlight to turn into fuel, and only requires nutrients, where this bacteria needs to get all it’s energy from the food it’s given. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|