|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here are some panspermia-related links: Definition of panspermia Are We All Aliens? The New Case for Panspermia Society for Life in Space panspermia.org
__________________
Goddard's Journal |
|
|||
|
Please excuse my ignorance here, there seems to be a presupposition with this theory that life evoled on Mars first and then was seeded here by meteorite impact.
I just wonder if there's any basis in science for this supposition. I suspect there must be, but if so, what is it? Why would Martian oceans evolve life before Terran ones?
__________________
There we were in the park when suddenly some old lady says I stole her purse..... I chucked the professor at her but she kept coming..... So I had to hit her with this purse I found. -- Bender |
|
||||
|
The best reason I am aware of is that Mars has a relatively low escape velocity; therefore material can leave that world after a much less energetic impact, allowing the hypothetical microbes inside to survive more easily.
Any impact that sent Earth rocks into orbit would be so energetic it would probably sterilise the material. Such impacts, capable of sending Earth rocks into orbit, are also rare; consider the fact that no material has been found on Earth that originated on Venus, which is of similar size to the Earth; but several meteorites are believed to have come from Mars. So, logically, if any exchange of living material ever took place in the early solar system, it probably came from Mars (or another small body) to the Earth, rather than the other way round. That does not prove that it necessarily did. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Incidentally, I wouldn't look to "www.panspermia.org" as a reference. It seems to take a "Creation Science" slant. You'll quickly find, among other things, an "Evolution vs. Creationism" page with complaints about "Darwinists." 'Nuff said. |
|
||||
|
I believe the panspermia idea goes back as far as Lord Kelvin. Considering all the superstition of the Middle Ages (or even earlier), meteor showers may have caused some thoughts on this idea as well.
It does not explain how life formed, however, only gives it more time elsewhere to form. I suspect it didn't need it but I skipped biology so don't take me too serious. ![]()
__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh. "The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly. |
|
|||
|
I would also bet that bacteria can survive a controlled descent via parachute as well as meteorite impact. So how do we know there isn't life on Mars and we put it there? Sort of a man-made panspermia?
|