Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Life in Space
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2005, 07:12 PM
Saluki's Avatar
Saluki Saluki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, Illinois, USA
Posts: 744
Send a message via Yahoo to Saluki
Default How to detect extraterrestrial life?

In the ongoing search for extraterrestrial life, it seems to me that so far, most of the probes/rovers have relied on indirect means. They try to determine whether a given environment is/was hospitable to life rather than whether there actually is/was life there. For example, we look for things like evidence of liquid water, atmospheric composition, temperature, pressure, etc.

I am interested in how we would directly decect extra-terrestrial life. Keeping in mind that life might have evolved much differently in a different environment, what we currently know about life on earth may not be applicable to alien life. However, IMO, there would be a few generic traits that the alien life would need to posess to be called life. These would include:
  1. Metabolism - The ability to convert available energy into a form usable to the life-form.
  2. Tropism - The ability to respond to external stimuli.
  3. Reproduction - The ability to propagate the species.

I am not a biologist, so I am probably oversimplifying here, but what exactly would we use to detect these functions when they might take forms that are completely unpredicted? Also, could we ever definitively conclude that there is/was no "life" on a given planet? Sure, if we detected something that is somewhat familiar, we could prove the positive, but could we ever prove the negative?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2005, 07:23 PM
Jorge's Avatar
Jorge Jorge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 745
Send a message via MSN to Jorge Send a message via Yahoo to Jorge Send a message via Skype™ to Jorge
Default

well, i'm no export so i'm just giving my 2 cent

I would keep it at seeing if there is a chance of life on a moon/planet/object

if there is a chance,... we can send a more advance probo to posibly find out what.

I see no point in trying to look for life lets say on the moon, i would probebly not find anything becouse it is just not posible.

hmmz doesn't seem to make much sens, hope you get waht i'm trying to say
__________________
GCS/S d(+) s+:+ a--- C++(+++)>$ W+++>$ L>+ M+>++ w++ P+>++ tv@ PS b+ DI+ G e-> h! r-- !z+

~Jorge Schrauwen
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2005, 08:16 PM
ToSeek's Avatar
ToSeek ToSeek is offline
Vulcan Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Greenbelt, MD
Posts: 24,225
Default

The Viking biology experiments were the only ones to look for life on another planet (so far). They appeared to looking for products of metabolism, for the most part.
__________________
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2005, 08:32 PM
Jorge's Avatar
Jorge Jorge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 745
Send a message via MSN to Jorge Send a message via Yahoo to Jorge Send a message via Skype™ to Jorge
Default

I just though of something, wouldn't it be easest to look for the wast productes of life? stuff life leave behind?
__________________
GCS/S d(+) s+:+ a--- C++(+++)>$ W+++>$ L>+ M+>++ w++ P+>++ tv@ PS b+ DI+ G e-> h! r-- !z+

~Jorge Schrauwen
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 18-January-2005, 08:59 PM
Saluki's Avatar
Saluki Saluki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Springfield, Illinois, USA
Posts: 744
Send a message via Yahoo to Saluki
Default

Thanks for the Viking link To Seek. I had forgotten about the bio experiments on Viking. I was a kid at the time of Viking (born in 1967), but I did follow them fairly closely. In looking at the experiments, it appears that they were strictly looking for a carbon-based life form that metabolizes in ways similar to life on Earth.

While carbon is an ideal base for life because of its bonding characteristics, IMO, it is not the only option. Also, what if there is some metabolization process unique to life on Mars, Titan, or wherever? What would a life form that "fed" on kinetic energy (wind, fluid motion) be like?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today