Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Life in Space
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 22-June-2005, 09:05 AM
qraal qraal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 109
Default

Hi All

I was trawling thru the ADS and found an article by Frank Tipler on Life and Cosmology.

Here's the abstract (I know the date is a bit old, but it's news to me. He's also written a new paper discussing experimental verification of the theory)...

International Journal of Astrobiology (2003), 2:141-148 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2003 Cambridge University Press
DOI 10.1017/S1473550403001526
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent life in cosmology
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank J. Tipler

Abstract

I shall present three arguments for the proposition that intelligent life is very rare in the universe. First, I shall summarize the consensus opinion of the founders of the modern synthesis (Simpson, Dobzhanski and Mayr) that the evolution of intelligent life is exceedingly improbable. Secondly, I shall develop the Fermi paradox: if they existed, they would be here. Thirdly, I shall show that if intelligent life were too common, it would use up all available resources and die out. But I shall show that the quantum mechanical principle of unitarity (actually a form of teleology!) requires intelligent life to survive to the end of time. Finally, I shall argue that, if the universe is indeed accelerating, then survival to the end of time requires that intelligent life, though rare, to have evolved several times in the visible universe. I shall argue that the acceleration is a consequence of the excess of matter over antimatter in the universe. I shall suggest experiments to test these claims.

http://tinyurl.com/a28ww [this is a FREE issue of the Journal]

...ok, some of us know of Frank's arguments for the Omega Point theory, that life in this universe (and all possible universes allowed by physics) will process infinite information in a finite proper time and thus reach a space-time singularity a lot like God-hood as the cosmos collapses.

In this article he argues that the accelerating universe is a consequence of the Standard Model of physics as minimally coupled to gravity. The cosmic acceleration comes from the Higgs field being almost cancelled out by the cosmological constant, and this is due to the matter/anti-matter asymmetry. Yet for the laws of physics as we know them to work then there can be no true black holes because these will evaporate away and destroy the entropy information encoded in the matter that fell into them. To stop black hole evaporation then the Universe must recollapse and intelligent life must cause that recollapse...

So how?

Here's where it gets really "Wow! Incredible!" - in both meanings of 'incredible'.

Firstly, the acceleration is due to the existence of baryons. So for the salvation of physics and the universe intelligent life MUST use reverse baryogenesis to convert all matter into energy i.e. total conversion of matter to energy MUST be possible WITHOUT mucking around with antimatter.

Secondly, because accelerated cosmic expansion has pushed regions of space beyond our Hubble volume there must be other intelligent lifeforms out there to cause "reverse baryogenesis" of the rest of the Universe.

Thirdly, he suggests that bacteria are older than the Earth and have seeded planets throughout our Hubble volume - at the fringes of which they will evolve into beings as intelligent as us to cause that "reverse bayogenesis" that sounds REALLY cool. Do you know what a total conversion drive can do??? Firstly it makes a Bussard ramjet viable. Secondly it means you can push planets around. Thirdly it means you can warm them up to nice temperatures.

Downside is that humans won't survive as carbon-based lifeforms - too many baryons - so life will have to figure out how to become a mix of leptons and light. That's ok because in that form the Big Crunch won't hassle us and we have about ~ a quadrillion years before it becomes really pressing.

Anyway, have a read and decide for yourself.

qraal
__________________
The universe is not only weirder than we imagine, it's weirder than we CAN imagine.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today