|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Life's Origins: Either Or? | |||
| Abiogenesis on Earth |
|
32 | 86.49% |
| Panspermia |
|
5 | 13.51% |
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I voted abiogenesis.
Panspermia can mean 2 things: That life started in space (e.g. inside a nebula or high orbit of exo-planet and floated into space) OR it started by abiogenesis ON ANOTHET PLANET and survived a flight through space to reach Earth and rain down (e.g. Earth life came from Mars by meteorite originating from Mars' surface). I'm going to apply Occam's Razor now, and pick abiogenesis on Earth as the most likely scenario. The right ingredients were all there. Nothing on Earth seems to have PREVENTED life from starting here, so abiogenesis on Earth seems a more likely option opposed to extra-planetary abiogenesis + surviving space flight. I'm not sure about the odds of life forming in space itself. Is there any reason to suspect that a nebula passed through our solar system 4 or 5 billion years ago and deposited proto-life on Earth? If not, then the odds of panspermia don't seem so good for that option.
__________________
This user is currently on a smooth slope of Mount Improbable |
|
||||
|
Are you asking the question about life on Earth, or life in general in the universe?
If it is the former, the answer could be either, with a somewhat smaller chance of life starting elsewhere in the solar system and migrating here. Mars is the most likely candidate. Lithopanspermia between stars in a cluster is also a very small possibility. -------- If it is about life in the universe as a whole, then all life started originally by abiogenesis, whether or not it has been subsequently transported by lithopanspemia or translocation by intelligent species.
__________________
New Orion's Arm Site . The Starlark . Against a Diamond Sky (OA Novella Collection) . OA Flickr set |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Would you say 1) the odds of life forming in outer space are bettr than the odds of life forming on Earth? Or 2) do you think panspermia-theory a likely candidate for 'seeding' Earth because life would have had more time to develop? (The Universe is older than the Earth, and life has had more time to form in space/nebulae, etc, long before Earth existed.) The options are not mutually exclusive per se, but I have my doubts about number one.
__________________
This user is currently on a smooth slope of Mount Improbable |
|
||||
|
I should've capitlaized "Earth" in the OP; Life on Earth origins (to answer your question, eburacum), as in primordial soup hypothesis...
I find it a conundrum somehow but can't quite articulate it at this time... more interested in the poll results really... ![]()
__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill |
|
||||
|
I'd go with an Earthly origin, just because the conditions in space are less than conducive to life. Could early life have come here from Mars? Possible, but 1) it would need to survive the trip, which would be no easy matter even for today's highly-evolved lifeforms with 5 billion years of survival adaptations, and 2) there's no reason to think Mars would be more likely to develop life than Earth.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
Oh, forgot to address the comet hypothesis. No dice there, a comet wouldn't have enough energy or any liquid water to support life. Even heat from the sun only sublimes off the outer layers, taking both heat and volatiles into space.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
I suspect abiogenesis on Earth. It doesn't mean panspermia or CA is impossible, just unlikely, in my opinion.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Technically, since Earth was formed by planetoids which clumped into planetesimals and then into planets, all water and organic chemicals on Earth did start out in comets and asteroids.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
I'd guess abiogenesis on Earth, but there are so many varieties of possible, if unlikely, transfers of life between planets and other domains. Abiogenesis on Mars with a subsequent move to Earth would be interesting.
After that there are many conceivable levels right up to galactic or even universal panspermia. I don't think they are probable, but what do I know? If I had to guess, I'd say sparsely distributed independent biospheres with occasional cross transfers within a solar system. Last edited by agingjb; 12-June-2007 at 05:47 PM.. |
|
|||
|
Our data, with a sample size of 1, are a little sparse. Abiogenesis on Earth seems to involve a smaller chain of unlikely events, so that's the way I'm voting. I'd put some money on it, but not all my savings.
|
|
||||
|
Actually, I think we've got a sample size of three, maybe more. One of the planets shoes signs of life and another presents evidence of past life, but is itself too small a sampling to be sure. The other objects currently show no signs of present or past life.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau |
|
||||
|
If you mean the Mars meteor, that hasn't been confirmed yet as having evidence of Martian life. What other planet has signs of life?
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
That's what I mean, it's inconclusive, but it is still part of the sample set, along with Luna and possibly Titan, Eros, and perhaps we should include Venus too since we've landed on all of them.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I guess I just don't understand what you mean. Earth is still the only planet confirmed to have evidence of life. Mars has questionable data that might show evidence, or might not. None of the other planets/moons mentioned have shown any evidence, at present all we have is speculation, based on a few possibilities. That still leaves just one planet with life.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort Last edited by Noclevername; 13-June-2007 at 02:48 AM.. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau |
|
||||
|
If it's not confirmed, by definition it's not evidence, it's incomplete data.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
I have a theory, but it's a bit woo woo.
What if the Universe really does need a conscious observer for it to exist? Then since we DO exist then the BB would be forced to happen and the first cells would be forced into existence, against all the odds. So from this theory I would say the life either started here on Earth or close by in space or maybe a long time ago soon after the BB, I dunno. If this were the case, then the scary thing maybe that Earth is the only planet with life on. As we have "observed" the Universe and no other planet need have been involve. told you it was a bit woowoo. ![]() |
|
||||
|
Not of the set of planets known to have life! Maybe if we were talking about the set of planets in general, or planets with the possibility of life, that might apply.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction." Shakespeare, Twelfth Night "The Mayan symbol for "book" looks a lot like a triple hamburger, but I've never seen them claiming it as proof the Mayans had Big Macs." - KaiYeves "Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort |
|
||||
|
Quote:
- If you mean that our observations of the Universe make it reality, then doesn't that mean that the Universe didn't exist before humans came along? So how did all those fossils get in the ground? How could we have evolved in the first place, if there was no-one to make the Universe a reality by observing it consciously? - If god is the conscious observer you mean, why would it/he/she be required? I read an amusing quote about quantum physics: Measuring the quantum state of a particle means that you influence the state itself (by shooting photons-light- at it to observe it, you distort your original particle). The quote was that "the true (original) quantum state of a particle would be unknown even to god himself." (paraphrasing here). So technically god (if such a being existed) would have to by-pass the laws of nature if he wants to be a conscious observer of the Universe. Unless god of course limits his observations to observing large scale physics, and ignores observing the quantum states of things. Quote:
Life forms adapt to their environment. Environments (i.e. the Universe) came first, and later life started to inhabit the environment. There is no reason to suggest that we -physical processen among many other processes- somehow forced the Universe into existence. We're not that special ![]() Anyway, not trying to pick a fight here, just agreeing with the 'woo woo' bit ![]()
__________________
This user is currently on a smooth slope of Mount Improbable |
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Intelligent information-processing must come into existence in the Universe, and, once it comes into existence, it will never die out." |
|
|||
|
It possible that endospores such as those formed by anthrax can survive for over a century on earth, but the longer the time spent as an endospore the more likely that their will be fatal damage to the endospore's DNA. Low temperatures could prolong this period, but since chunks of life spore containing rock blown off earth or mars are likely to spend a great deal of time wandering around the inner solar they are unlikely to reach the very low temperatures needed to preserve DNA for a very long time. Rocks closer than the asteroid belt or closer are likely to spend much of their time at 200K or higher which should be warm enough to allow the slow decay of DNA. Early life on earth didn't use DNA and it is possible that this life could be better at surviving space trips, but we can't really say. This makes panspermia by DNA based life very unlikely, but not impossible across interplanetary distances.
|
|
||||
|
And there is another problem with panspermia, Ronald Brak.
Virusses, even if they survived the trip through space, require living cells. They 'hi-jack' living cells and use them to produce more copies of their own genetic material (i.e. to reproduce). If there are no single (or multi)-celled organisms on the planet where it lands, the virus will still die out. Even if this other world is inhabited by life forms, the virus will most likely be unable to adapt to this unknown sort of 'DNA'. Most virusses are quite picky and require a very specific type of host. The best candidate for panspermia would probably be a life form that lives off non-living matter. Spores that lay dorment, and that produce fungi that suck nutrients out of the ground might be likely candidates. Any life form that requires living cells for survival (like virussen that reproduce inside cells, or micro-organisms that feed on living matter) will most likely run out of food long before they reach their new home. And even if they get there, they might encouter an existing ecosystem, which might be very hard to 'infiltrate'. But personally, I'm more of an abiogenesis fan.
__________________
This user is currently on a smooth slope of Mount Improbable |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GOODS: Going Deep into Our Cosmic Origins with NASA's Great Observatories | Blob | Astronomy | 1 | 14-August-2006 02:11 PM |
| Life's Building Blocks: Common in Space? | A.DIM | Life in Space | 49 | 10-January-2006 08:56 PM |
| Meteor Impacts: Life's Jump Starter? | ToSeek | Life in Space | 1 | 10-August-2005 09:56 PM |