Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > Space and Astronomy > Life in Space
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:34 PM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Your answer to a question about science is a reference to religious beliefs. Great.

By the way, the word "consciousness" gets kicked around here all the time with people throwing around different beliefs. Thanks for another great example of why it is so useless in a scientific discussion.
Prove to me that buddhism is a religion. Spirtuality is a natural part of humanity. You don't separate it from humanity to have a higher understanding. Science is only a catching net, it doesn't reveal any truth, we are the ones that realize the truth, not science. Science is merely a method to test out how theories.

Consciousness has plenty of scientific coverage. Look it up. It mirrors what buddhism says about it.
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:36 PM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
Knowledge without memory is useless- any particular item of knowledge you might have would be forgotten instantly. Omniscience plus amnesia does not work, unfortunately- because you would lose all knowledge straight away.
We're not talking about knowledge. We're talking about KNOWING. KNowing does not require 'knowledge'. Knowledge, is subjective. Knowing, is not.
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:39 PM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Humanity can't be the goal of evolution because evolution does not have a goal.

Dinosaurs didn't want to be human becasue humans could not have survived in the planetary conditions of the time.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:40 PM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
I think most folks here understand that you've made that assertion. The issue is that you're promoting a scientifically unsupportable belief.
Prove it.
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:42 PM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ara Pacis View Post
Humanity can't be the goal of evolution because evolution does not have a goal.

Dinosaurs didn't want to be human becasue humans could not have survived in the planetary conditions of the time.
rofl, yes we could have. Wejust weren't around. Dinoasaurs did want tobe human, beacuse that's what all wanting and desire leads to. And anyway, we evolved from their descendents, other reptiles, into mammal, and eventually into us.
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:47 PM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,550
Default

Actually mammals evolved from therapsids, a group of reptiles which existed before the dinosaurs evolved. So in many ways we did not evolve from the dinosaurs, and they signally failed to evolve into us. In your theory most- in fact almost all- species fail to acheive their goal.
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:48 PM
N!ck N!ck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 34
Send a message via MSN to N!ck
Default

ToySoldier, you can't just reply to a message with 'prove it', and by can't, I am taking into account the fact that you already have.

'And you're saying, that if any one creature on this planet desires something, given the emotion, life/fate/universal balance instantly paves the way to it becoming, Human?

'And by Human we're saying, two-legged, walking, talking ape-like creatures?
With hair, and not fur?
__________________
"Well, gee' they might wanna know, I mean; what happens if I, drop a black hole, in a black hole?"
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:50 PM
N!ck N!ck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 34
Send a message via MSN to N!ck
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
In your theory most- in fact almost all- species fail to acheive their goal.
I like to think, although in their current states, most of the species inhabiting this planet have evolved just fine

I know it's not your theory, but I'd like to see if anyone agrees with me here.
__________________
"Well, gee' they might wanna know, I mean; what happens if I, drop a black hole, in a black hole?"
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:53 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
Prove it.
Sorry, it's your burden of proof. Here was your statement:

Human life is the result of everything that wants to be, the stars, the planets, our moon. Everything in the uinverse pulled on earth, that created the first life forms, so that they could become us. It was all meant to be.

Please present the scientific support for "It was all meant to be."
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 03-March-2008, 11:59 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
Consciousness has plenty of scientific coverage. Look it up. It mirrors what buddhism says about it.

Well then, you should have no trouble providing references that show a specific, objective definition of "consciousness" and the experiments that confirm this definition.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Reply With Quote
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:00 AM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
rofl, yes we could have. Wejust weren't around. Dinoasaurs did want tobe human, beacuse that's what all wanting and desire leads to. And anyway, we evolved from their descendents, other reptiles, into mammal, and eventually into us.
No, there was to much CO2 and not enough easily digestible food. Dinosaurs were big because they had to be able to take in lots of nutrient poor food and store lots of atmospheric gas for oxygen exchange. They probably had small brains because the environment didn't provide enough energy to support such energy intensive organs.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:01 AM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
Actually mammals evolved from therapsids, a group of reptiles which existed before the dinosaurs evolved. So in many ways we did not evolve from the dinosaurs, and they signally failed to evolve into us. In your theory most- in fact almost all- species fail to acheive their goal.
Um, sorry to inform you, but theraspids have only existed for around 200 million years. Dinosaurs have existed for a few million years longer than that.
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:02 AM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ara Pacis View Post
No, there was to much CO2 and not enough easily digestible food. Dinosaurs were big because they had to be able to take in lots of nutrient poor food and store lots of atmospheric gas for oxygen exchange. They probably had small brains because the environment didn't provide enough energy to support such energy intensive organs.
rofl. No there wasn't. The air back then was much cleaner and easier to breathe than it is now.
Reply With Quote
  #164 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:05 AM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N!ck View Post
ToySoldier, you can't just reply to a message with 'prove it', and by can't, I am taking into account the fact that you already have.

'And you're saying, that if any one creature on this planet desires something, given the emotion, life/fate/universal balance instantly paves the way to it becoming, Human?
Your attempts to discredit me are pathetic.

I never said all animals become human eventually. Some die out to give rise to better creatures. Howerver, all that wanting and dsire that they have, is the result of them wanting to be human.... wanting to become what we have become.
Reply With Quote
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:07 AM
ToySoldier ToySoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Sorry, it's your burden of proof. Here was your statement:

Human life is the result of everything that wants to be, the stars, the planets, our moon. Everything in the uinverse pulled on earth, that created the first life forms, so that they could become us. It was all meant to be.

Please present the scientific support for "It was all meant to be."
Scientific evidence.

You can only do what you think is right, and you can only do what is possible. Therefore, whatever you do, was meant to happen.

Take omniscience for example, yo know eveyrthing you're going to do. This means that whatever you do was meant to be.
Reply With Quote
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:20 AM
Ara Pacis's Avatar
Ara Pacis Ara Pacis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: between the candle and the star.
Posts: 1,975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
rofl. No there wasn't. The air back then was much cleaner and easier to breathe than it is now.
Not according to the documentary I saw a couple weeks ago.
__________________
"What you think you thought you saw you did not see." Agent J, MiB - Manhatten Bureau
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:23 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
Um, sorry to inform you, but theraspids have only existed for around 200 million years. Dinosaurs have existed for a few million years longer than that.
That is not correct; Therapsids evolved in the Permian, which is before the Triassic. The Dinos did not evolve until the Triassic.
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:26 AM
eburacum45's Avatar
eburacum45 eburacum45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: old york
Posts: 4,550
Default

It seems that 'knowing' something is not quite as useful as 'knowledge'.
If you 'know' something without proof and data you run the risk of being incorrect; if you are incorrect you may never 'know' that you are.
This is not knowledge, it is 'belief'. And belief can be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:31 AM
N!ck N!ck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 34
Send a message via MSN to N!ck
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToySoldier View Post
Your attempts to discredit me are pathetic.

I never said all animals become human eventually. Some die out to give rise to better creatures. Howerver, all that wanting and dsire that they have, is the result of them wanting to be human.... wanting to become what we have become.
I'm not trying to discredit you.

When I use a question mark, it normally indicates my confusion, or in the context I initially went for, a vague chance for you to correct me not... fly off the handle with insinuations of me somehow, attempting to discredit you, where all I've done is worded something / you've / misread wrong.

Though your stamina is intriguing, how you can sit there, if you're sitting, and brush off everyones' polite, if not as-equally-passionate-as-your-own replies, as if it's dirt on your shoulder.

Will you ever stop 'rofl'ing and, just maybe, back up your claims?
Wikipedia will do.
Just as long as you're not just scoffing at everyones' own opinions.

Sorry Soldier, but I'm being as polite as I can.
__________________
"Well, gee' they might wanna know, I mean; what happens if I, drop a black hole, in a black hole?"
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 04-March-2008, 12:49 AM
DrWho DrWho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 90
Default

This thread has some of the most funny misconceptions and delusions that I have come across in a very long time. Let me recap some howlers:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy
the goal of evolution is humanity... now put 2 and 2 together.
1)That's becau