Ozzy

ozzy, hi

i feel in the interest of common decency, you ought to post an apology in the OTB section, where you objected to a fellow-BAUTer's site. you don't have to. but may an idea, nevertheless.

sorry i gave you the reply of another member, you can still read it as a reply to you.

They closed my thread for not being scientific enough about space and astronomy so i'll answer you in a message:


Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEELECTRICMONKEY View Post
...
>Some people see my article as numerology even though it's not.

It is exactly numerology.

>I don't prove my point by saying what numbers spiritually mean. I show that for enough people it means something eventually.

You are attaching meaning to ad hoc patterns in numbers on the basis of a perception that the patterns can't plausibly be coincidence, hence must "mean" something. That is numerology. It doesn't matter whether the meaning is "spiritual."

of course it does.
no numerolgy going on when saying 4 is no-prime, and our counting goes by the conecpt of 10, and that perfect number is such and such.
these are all mathematical meanings, not like saying that 4 is about love.

saying that 4 means love is numerology, but saying that enough people see 4 as love is not numerology.

Let's think about this like this:
It is Pareidolia.
All over the world people try to find their number connections using pareidolia, some more, some less, some always, some never.
If humans associate destruction with numbers only using pareidolia, after a few thousand years, you can have two options:
1. If some numbers are indeed more connected to destruction for the mind, globally, they will appear in more cases of pareidolia. If those numbers are not connected to a specific language, they will appear in more cases of pareidolia in different cultures with different language.
2. If all numbers are equally subject to pareidolia as far as destruction goes,
people will find it hard to agree on any set of numbers.

Now, what does the process of pareidolia want to accomplish ?
It wants to give a symbolic meaning to a number.
Let's look at a peridoliac person from the outside.
He tells you "4's makes me love things, 4 is all about love for me, all the girls I loved had so much 4's in their names and lives" and so on.
He says: 4 symbolizes love. (and he can add: to me, to you, to everyone, to our people, to men, for now at least, and so on, while the common to all saying, is giving a symbolic meaning to a number, which is not a mathematical meaning).
All over the world, all cases of pareidolia, are trying to do that.
Now, if a 9/11 combo somehow means destruction for enough people.
(This could be very subtle, even if out of 100 cases, only 5 are a 9/11 combo, if it's the most common combo in the list, it's the one with the most accumulating affect, over thousands of years)
what will happen with a "natural" process of pareidolia ?
The symbol will be more accepted as a symbol of destruction.
Right now, the 9/11 concept is a symbol of destruction in the language, and in more than one calender.
From all possible pariedolia going on, that's the one that convinced most people to see some symbolic connection, consciously, between a 9/11 combo in the year, and with destruction.
Nobody forces you to fear the combo, or to look for it, or any other pareidolic activity, but it forces you to see what is the accepted meaning of the combo in language, if you wish to understand language like others.
How does this match the nowadays ?
Why is from all dates of destruction only the 9.11 is remembered with the date, and with the combo ? why is there so much pareidolia about it than ever before ? why can't we explain the 2012 obsessions saying that in this period of time, dates are more charming than ever which causes a specific stream of pareidolia ?