Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 04:48 AM
Doe, John's Avatar
Doe, John Doe, John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: undisclosed
Posts: 634
Default

Remember when JPax had the sigline that said something like, anything you send me in PM will be used against you in public. Just a thought about maybe why SFC didn't take it to PM's. She knew he wouldn't keep it there. Total speculation on my part.
__________________
Free speech is no problem
It's listening that costs
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 04:50 AM
Normandy6644's Avatar
Normandy6644 Normandy6644 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ithaca, New York
Posts: 3,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doe, John
Remember when JPax had the sigline that said something like, anything you send me in PM will be used against you in public. Just a thought about maybe why SFC didn't take it to PM's. She knew he wouldn't keep it there. Total speculation on my part.
Good call, I remember that too.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 04:58 AM
stu stu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 279
Send a message via AIM to stu
Default

I also wish to lend my voice in saying that, in my interpretation of the BA's rules (though since it's not my board, my interpretation doesn't really matter), JPax should've been banned long, long ago, and if anything, SciFi Chick should've gotten a medal.

Personally, I got into an arguement with JPax before on this board and even though I tried to remain relatively civil, I got really ticked off at him. Among others, SciFi Chick came to my defense and she was also among those who had told me that JPax likes to start these sorts of arguments and then tries to confuse the issue with colorful and flowery language that is dripping with sarcasm. If I hadn't been in the right frame of mind, I would've posted how I felt and gotten myself banned.

I think SciFi Chick just had been up against this so many times, she was probably having a bad day, and JPax just tipped her over the edge.

In my opinion, the banning criteria should be allowed to be offset by a person's track record, in which case SciFi Chick should be welcomed back on this board with open arms.
__________________
"If not now, later." -- me

Useful astro site (yes, it's mine, but it's still quite extensive) ~ http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/stu/index.html
My Astrophotography/Photography site ~ http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/stu/me/photos/index.html
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:13 AM
Kesh's Avatar
Kesh Kesh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 1,134
Send a message via ICQ to Kesh Send a message via Yahoo to Kesh
Default

I'm just glad I avoided that subject every time it was posted. I still don't understand the debate (and please don't bring it in here!), but people get insanely argumentative over it every time.
__________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."
Philip K. Dick, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes."
Mark Twain

Avatar courtesy of Bunny.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:15 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I also agree entirely with the theme of his thread. Please think it over BA...
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 06:01 AM
ChesleyFan ChesleyFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 218
Default

Dang. Look what happens when I go to work...

Can't say I had much dealing with JPax. The SciFi Chick banning floored me, though.

And now here I am, waiting for the BA to submit his "lengthy post" at one in the morning...
__________________
I like crinoids.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 06:06 AM
MrObvious MrObvious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stu
I also wish to lend my voice in saying that, in my interpretation of the BA's rules (though since it's not my board, my interpretation doesn't really matter), JPax should've been banned long, long ago, and if anything, SciFi Chick should've gotten a medal.

Personally, I got into an arguement with JPax before on this board and even though I tried to remain relatively civil, I got really ticked off at him. Among others, SciFi Chick came to my defense and she was also among those who had told me that JPax likes to start these sorts of arguments and then tries to confuse the issue with colorful and flowery language that is dripping with sarcasm. If I hadn't been in the right frame of mind, I would've posted how I felt and gotten myself banned.

I think SciFi Chick just had been up against this so many times, she was probably having a bad day, and JPax just tipped her over the edge.

In my opinion, the banning criteria should be allowed to be offset by a person's track record, in which case SciFi Chick should be welcomed back on this board with open arms.

Well said Stu, I'd go further to say she showed remarkable restraint considering all the history.
Point in case, it would never have happened if it was acted upon earlier so I quess we can all learn something here. If there is someone doing such things then report them straight away, it's too late once people are pushed beyond their limits. Secondly, it's impossible for the BA to keep this place fair without our input.....
__________________
MrObvious
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 09:52 AM
Glom's Avatar
Glom Glom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: University of Birmingham
Posts: 6,649
Send a message via MSN to Glom
Default

I think this will go down in the history of the board as the St. Paddy's Day Scandal. Usually, everyone accepts BA's decisions on banning even if they are unhappy about it. But this time, we are getting incitement to rebellion.
__________________
Freedom For Fission A breath of fresh Iodine-131
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 09:58 AM
Lycus's Avatar
Lycus Lycus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: California
Posts: 1,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glom
Usually, everyone accepts BA's decisions on banning even if they are unhappy about it. But this time, we are getting incitement to rebellion.
So, would the appointment of a moderator from amoung our ranks be akin to the creation of a Parliament? (Just kidding, BA :wink: )
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 10:20 AM
N C More's Avatar
N C More N C More is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth, MA
Posts: 2,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stu
I also wish to lend my voice in saying that, in my interpretation of the BA's rules (though since it's not my board, my interpretation doesn't really matter), JPax should've been banned long, long ago, and if anything, SciFi Chick should've gotten a medal.

Personally, I got into an arguement with JPax before on this board and even though I tried to remain relatively civil, I got really ticked off at him. Among others, SciFi Chick came to my defense and she was also among those who had told me that JPax likes to start these sorts of arguments and then tries to confuse the issue with colorful and flowery language that is dripping with sarcasm. If I hadn't been in the right frame of mind, I would've posted how I felt and gotten myself banned.
Generally, I stay out of this type of issue but this time is an exception. Last night I sent a PM to the BA stating my observations of JPax's behavior. I have seen JPax engage in this type of thing many times. His condescending attitude coupled with suble put downs and veiled insults has been going on for some time. This sort of thing is not beneficial for free and open discussion and certainly not the sort of thing that would be found to be "welcoming" by anyone new to the bulletin board. I know that his behavior was wearing on many and feel that SciFi Chick was finally the one who broke down and voiced her frustration with this individual.

I, too, enter a plea for reconsideration.
__________________
An open mind is like an open window...without a good screen you'll get all sorts of weird bugs!
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 11:12 AM
TriangleMan's Avatar
TriangleMan TriangleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Qatar
Posts: 3,528
Default

Man, leave to celebrate St. Patrick's day and all heck breaks loose.
__________________
Now while I might be amused by Cthulhians, I don't necessarily distrust them to carry out the functions of government. -- JayUtah

What's it like being a skeptic in the Middle East? Check out my blog.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:03 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

We need more women on these and other boards.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:12 PM
Gullible Jones's Avatar
Gullible Jones Gullible Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,032
Default

There will be shortly enough...
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:13 PM
pumpkinpie's Avatar
pumpkinpie pumpkinpie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gullible Jones
There will be shortly enough...
What do you mean by that?
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:14 PM
Musashi's Avatar
Musashi Musashi is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,252
Send a message via AIM to Musashi
Default

Don't women reproduce by budding? If so, we will soon have tons of women on the board.
__________________
Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,
þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon,
hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:22 PM
Frog march's Avatar
Frog march Frog march is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 4,271
Default

No, they're all on the body snatchers BB.




.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 18-March-2005, 05:22 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

She's back.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today