|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I'm a big fan of philosophy, but I find much of it useless, esp. the old time philosophers since the field of Evolutionary Psychology and Neurobiology answers all of their ponderings. Evolutionary Psychology does not get media coverage from the Marxist leaning American mainstream media, so many people still believe old-time philosophers are still valid. Here is the international Evolutionary Psychology headquarters: http://www.hbes.com/
One example of an obsolete philosophical pondering in whether we have free will. But, Evolutionary Psychology has shown us that evolution simply drives the brain to function in ways that maximizes reproductive success. As such, our natural inclinations are set for such a goal. Second, neuro-biology has shown that our brain at the micro-level is just a computer program, where the ones and zeros in the binary code are analagous to the patterns of synapses in the brain. The speed of nerve conduction in the brain is analagous to the processor speed, front-side bus speed, PCI bus speed, and so forth in the computer, and the amount of neurons in the brain is analagous to the computer RAM, cache, and hard-drive size. Thus, humans have no more free will than does a super-computer. But, getting back to the title of this thread, we have modern philosophers now, many whom I still think are useless because they ignore or are unaware of the answers evolutionary psychology and neuro-biology provides. But one philosophical perspective that I believe has validity is the claim that we really cannot know reality in the absolute sense: http://www.simulation-argument.com/ Quote:
Regards.
__________________
Some very incorrect thoughts by Professor Chris Brand |
|
|||
|
So, AA, you started this thread because of a biological need to satisfy evolutionary psychology? Can you elaborate on why?
I have considered the possibility that we are all part of a computer program. I keep coming back to the question: Who programmed it? Who constructed the hardware it runs on? God? The Architect and the Oracle? Two white mice that are representations of hyperdimensional beings?
__________________
"Oh no no no I'm a rocket man Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone." -- Sir Elton John J Pax |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Oh no no no I'm a rocket man Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone." -- Sir Elton John J Pax |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
|||
|
Great! I finally accept the fact that I'm encoded in pi and now you move me to a computer simulation!
__________________
Life is like a box of chocolates. All of your choices are bad for you. |
|
|||
|
Been reading Gibson a bit too much lately? Did you know he typed his manuscripts on a manual typewriter?
__________________
When I am done here I think I will go create something from metal. |
|
||||
|
Nah. do not belive that we are in a computer simulation. I mean if we were, you still have to ask yuorself: Why did they create the Mime? A being of such pure evil could never be creatied willingly by a programmer.
Seriously? No. Yes i believe we evilved, yes i believe the brain can be explained in computer terms. Does that mean that our brain is a computer programmed by some other being? no. Everything in our brain, all our actions, all our manerisms are learned, and evolved throught millenia of trial and erorr. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
|||
|
Oh, so is it like Tron? Are we all computer programs that still have a biological or higher dimensional User? Are we avatars of a superstring entity or entities?
So, is the poet correct when she says that your eyes are the Windows(TM) into your soul? I guess ctrl+ alt+delete works in real life as evidenced by this parsing: Control. Alternately, delete. Hmmm, the essence of big government? So if we assume the programmer is God, or at least resembles one by virtue of having godlike powers over us, then who is Satan? Bad AI? Virus? Malware? Script-kiddie? Hacker/Cracker? Kid brother who wants to play space invaders while God is trying to finish his 10th grade cyber-biology paper?
__________________
"Oh no no no I'm a rocket man Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone." -- Sir Elton John J Pax |
|
||||
|
And who's that guy over there wearing the Red Hat? Prometheus? :-k
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Flying in space is risky business, but just staying on this planet is risky business too." - John Young, astronaut |
|
||||
|
Without evidence of this being the case, I see it as just an interesting idea which has no direct effect and is therefore of no practical value.
(Without meaning to offend anyone, [edit - I removed this bit, really a bit much]). The most interesting idea I've seen on this line is this: 1. say there is only one "real" Universe. 2. say that it is posible to simulate a (subset of the) Universe in a computer. 3. say there could be many computers simulating Universes. 4. it follows (apparently) that we are much more lilely to be in a simulated Universe than in the "real" Universe. I had trouble with that. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Knowledge is a curse, but ignorance is worse |
|
||||
|
I don't where I read an interesting argument about this.
If we lived in a computer simulation, we might find out because of anomalies in physical systems. A computer cannot practically simulate a physical system with infinite accuracy. For example, the popular Pioneer anomaly might be the result of rounding errors done by the computer that calculates the motion of the Pioneer using Newtonian Mechanics.
__________________
papageno "Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous?" - Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes) "It's all about context!" - Vince Noir (The Mighty Boosh) "I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!" - Zapp Brannigan (Futurama) "...because the logic of the lines traced from reality is as poor of aesthetic value as it is strict in consistency. " - Paolo Bozzi (Naive Physics - free translation) |
|
||||
|
As Enzp said, this is just the old brain in the vat (we called it brain in a box) debate. It was the kind of thing that kept me up all night, talking with my friends, when I was 15 (ah, the good old days).
Quote:
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King) One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009 All moderation in purple |
|
||||
|
Is Searle's Chinese Box argument of any value here ? :-?
To what end would such a program have been constructed? Would each person be simulated by a parallel processor / sub program? With the exponential growth rate we have, would there not be an upper limit to how many beings the great computer could handle (Or maybe that is the purpose of wars, a special program designed to run system purges so processor space is freed up) Are we going to be demolished by the Vogons 5 minutes before the final read out? ![]()
__________________
Moderations in purple Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things. To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: ![]() ───────────────────────────────────────────── ◄ Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice ► |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hear us, oh great Operating System, spare us this day from the Ctrl-Alt-Delete! Neither Format us nor Delete us. Raise us up to Archival Storage. Shelter us from the Blue Screen of Death. ![]()
__________________
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King) One Earth, One Sky - IYA 2009 All moderation in purple |
|
||||
|
If we were living in a computer simulation, the programmer might have thought about some lines starting with "on Error GoTo" !!
(bureaucratics... )
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name. |
|
|||
|
And God said, "Let there be Light!"
Unable to parse voice command. Please Restate. "Let there be Light!" Dictionary module missing, reloading backup, please restate. "Let there be Light!" Hardware fault in Sound Hardware:Microphone --Harmonic Distortion, please lower voice and restate. "Let there be Light." Command Accepted, Please input color, brightness, contrast parameters, and also light source or sources dimensions, locations, illumination levels, color temperature.... "To Hell with it!" God pushes the button.
__________________
"Oh no no no I'm a rocket man Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone." -- Sir Elton John J Pax |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
To the regular visitor of internet bulletin boards it is clear that it's an excellent idea your parents get to choose your real name. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
On Error Resume Next Just accept it and move on. ![]()
__________________
Do try not to take me too seriously. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|