Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General Interest > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 10:12 AM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 5,520
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default Bad Math?

The following has appeared on our intranet

Quote:
Is this really true?
The conjecture is that 0.9 recurring (i.e. 0.9999....9) is actually equal to 1
For this exercise I will use the notation 0.99... as notation for 0.9 recurring. This is because HTML will not let me put the little dot over the 9 without using graphics.
• Let X = 0.99...
• Then 10X = 9.99...
• Subtract X from each side
This gives us
• 9X = 9
• Divide both sides by 9
• Therefore X = 1
But hang on a moment I thought we said X was equal to 0.99...
Yes it does but from our calculations X is also equal to one. So;
• X = 0.99... = 1
Therefore 0.99... = 1
Any thoughts on this as to fatal flaws? :-?

(Note 2nd attempt at posting this)
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: http://www.bautforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic14611_1.gif
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 10:43 AM
Fram's Avatar
Fram Fram is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buggenhout, Belgium
Posts: 3,140
Default

This has been discussed in four or five simultaneous and very long threads. Don't say you have missed those!
__________________
Knowledge is a curse, but ignorance is worse
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:18 AM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

no, 0.999... really does equal 1. And there seems to be nothing wrong with that argument.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:27 AM
lti lti is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 247
Default

hmm that proof doesnt really make any sense.

but 0.9 recurring certainly does equal 1
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:29 AM
Fram's Avatar
Fram Fram is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buggenhout, Belgium
Posts: 3,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
hmm that proof doesnt really make any sense.

but 0.9 recurring certainly does equal 1
What doesn't make sense? It's perhaps not a rigorous proof, more of an example, but it's an example that rightly convinces many people.
__________________
Knowledge is a curse, but ignorance is worse
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:40 AM
lti lti is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 247
Default

what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:53 AM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9

isn't it 9.999....-0.999...=9?
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:55 AM
worzel's Avatar
worzel worzel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9
On the left hand side you have 10X-X, which must equal 9X, And on the right hand side you have 9.999...- 0.999... which must equal 9.

I would have thought that the step some may question is 0.999... x 10 = 9.999...
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand ternary, those who don't, and those waiting for a bus.
If logic doesn't work, then surely it does.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 11:56 AM
Captain Kidd's Avatar
Captain Kidd Captain Kidd is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,123
Default

Here we go again. Anybody wanna lay bets on how many pages this goes on?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:02 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9
On the left hand side you have 10X-X, which must equal 9X, And on the right hand side you have 9.999...- 0.999... which must equal 9.

I would have thought that the step some may question is 0.999... x 10 = 9.999...
that's easy, each 9 just moves one space to the left.
Each 9 becomes ten times as large.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:07 PM
Fram's Avatar
Fram Fram is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buggenhout, Belgium
Posts: 3,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
Quote:
Originally Posted by worzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9
On the left hand side you have 10X-X, which must equal 9X, And on the right hand side you have 9.999...- 0.999... which must equal 9.

I would have thought that the step some may question is 0.999... x 10 = 9.999...
that's easy, each 9 just moves one space to the left.
Each 9 becomes ten times as large.
[Devil's advocate] Yeah, but, originally, you had an infinite series of nines after the decimal point, but now you have one less. So that doesn't count, does it?
__________________
Knowledge is a curse, but ignorance is worse
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:13 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fram
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
Quote:
Originally Posted by worzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by lti
what i dont get is how people who didnt get that 0.9... equals 1 would think that 10 - 0.9... = 9
On the left hand side you have 10X-X, which must equal 9X, And on the right hand side you have 9.999...- 0.999... which must equal 9.

I would have thought that the step some may question is 0.999... x 10 = 9.999...
that's easy, each 9 just moves one space to the left.
Each 9 becomes ten times as large.
[Devil's advocate] Yeah, but, originally, you had an infinite series of nines after the decimal point, but now you have one less. So that doesn't count, does it?
If you can say that "you had an infinite series of nines", then
you can also say that the process of moving the 9s to the left gos on for "infinity"
And at the end of the day infinity-1=infinity
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:14 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Bad Math?

Pi = 3, now, there's a REAL challenge!

(Play Salieri!)

__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:24 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 5,520
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fram
This has been discussed in four or five simultaneous and very long threads. Don't say you have missed those!
Sorry I seem to have missed all of them ops:
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: http://www.bautforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic14611_1.gif
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:47 PM
worzel's Avatar
worzel worzel is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London
Posts: 3,114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
If you can say that "you had an infinite series of nines", then you can also say that the process of moving the 9s to the left gos on for "infinity"
And at the end of the day infinity-1=infinity
Yeah, but some people have difficulty with that. If someone thinks that 1 - 0.99... doesn't equal 0 then then they presumably think that multiplying 0.99... by 10 will inrease the difference between the 9s after the decimal point by 10 also. So taking away the original 0.99... from 10 x 0.99... should leave you with 9 + (9 times the difference between 0.99... and 1).

The demonstration only works if you think that difference is 0. But it does demostrate that it makes sense to think that, in this case.
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand ternary, those who don't, and those waiting for a bus.
If logic doesn't work, then surely it does.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:55 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by worzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
If you can say that "you had an infinite series of nines", then you can also say that the process of moving the 9s to the left gos on for "infinity"
And at the end of the day infinity-1=infinity
Yeah, but some people have difficulty with that. If someone thinks that 1 - 0.99... doesn't equal 0 then then they presumably think that multiplying 0.99... by 10 will inrease the difference between the 9s after the decimal point by 10 also. So taking away the original 0.99... from 10 x 0.99... should leave you with 9 + (9 times the difference between 0.99... and 1).

The demonstration only works if you think that difference is 0. But it does demostrate that it makes sense to think that, in this case.
at the start of the proof your just using the form 0.9999...., your not saying it is equal to 1 it is just a way of writing down a number.

with 9.9999....-0.9999....(expressing the numbers in the same way) doesn't it seem obvious that the 0.9999.... part of the expressions cancel out? There is a 9 in the first expression for every nine in the second which just leaves the 9 to the left of the decimal point.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 12:59 PM
Tensor Tensor is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 3,890
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
doesn't it seem obvious that the 0.9999.... part of the expressions cancel out?
Just because it's obvious to you, doesn't mean it's obvious to everyone. (for the record, it is obvious to me.)
__________________
Some try to tell me, thoughts they cannot defend,... - Moody Blues.

Neptune- The original Dark Matter.

The author feels that this technique of deliberately lying will actually make it easier for you to learn the ideas. - Donald Knuth
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:14 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

9.9999.... is just 9+0.9999....

so if you put it like
9.9999....-0.9999....=
9+0.9999....-0.9999....=9

it is easier to see that the 0.9999.....s simply cancel out leaving 9.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:14 PM
SciFi Chick's Avatar
SciFi Chick SciFi Chick is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fram
This has been discussed in four or five simultaneous and very long threads. Don't say you have missed those!
Sorry I seem to have missed all of them ops:
One wonders where you were then. There were polls with it in the title, etc.

Heck, I got into some serious trouble in one of them that resulted in my being temporarily banned.

Where were you?
__________________
"The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient."
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:20 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tensor
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
doesn't it seem obvious that the 0.9999.... part of the expressions cancel out?
Just because it's obvious to you, doesn't mean it's obvious to everyone. (for the record, it is obvious to me.)
I suppose self evident is a better term.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:25 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,112
Default

Here are the previous threads about this:

Do you think 0.9999999~ =1 , that is infinite 9s.
Two reasons why .999...=1
Where do you stand now?
the missing number....

By the way, Sticks, the proof in the OP is correct.

Edited to reshuffle the links.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:26 PM
Sticks's Avatar
Sticks Sticks is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Posts: 5,520
Send a message via MSN to Sticks
Default

in a cave ?

The phrase that comes to mind, which came from Alan Partridge is:

Quote:
My God I have spawned a monster
#-o

Are we talking here about a converging series, or am I totally up the creek with out even a canoe, let alone a paddle ops:
__________________
Moderations in purple

Fame, glory, adventure, a cyber warrior craves not these things.

To report a post (even this one) to the moderation team, click the reporting icon in the upper-right corner of the post: http://www.bautforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic14611_1.gif
─────────────────────────────────────────────
Rules For Posting To This Board ► ◄ Forum FAQs ► ◄ Conspiracy Theory Advice ► ◄ Alternate Theory Advice
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:36 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks
Are we talking here about a converging series, or am I totally up the creek with out even a canoe, let alone a paddle ops:

it isn't a converging series, it is just a way of writing a number and it just happens to represent the same value as 1.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:44 PM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,163
Default

I'm okay with .99999999=1



but is 1 a prime number? is .9999999 a prime number?



those are big questions.

Quote:
PRIME NUMBER. Is 1 a prime number? Most textbooks today call it neither prime nor composite, but older texts generally considered it to be prime. In 1859, Lebesgue stated explicitly that 1 is prime in Exercices d'analyse numérique. It is prime in Primary Elements of Algebra for Common Schools and Academies (1866) by Joseph Ray and Standard Arithmetic (1892) by William J. Milne. A list of primes to 10,006,721 published in 1914 by D. N. Lehmer includes 1. [David Cantrell suggests this is more a historical issue and is inappropriate for this page. He writes, "No high-school students (unless they're doing historical research) are going to encounter a legitimate definition of prime which would include 1." This entry may be removed.]
http://members.aol.com/jeff570/ambiguities.html
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:48 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sticks
Are we talking here about a converging series, or am I totally up the creek with out even a canoe, let alone a paddle ops:
it isn't a converging series, it is just a way of writing a number and it just happens to represent the same value as 1.
Sorry, Frog March. It is a converging series, too:

0.999... = 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ...
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 01:56 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

Yes,ok.

but when people start talking about converging series they seem to become more confusesed.

writing 0.9999..... on its own is already a complete number. So is [sumof] 9/10+9/100...... but it doesn't seem like that to some, more like a process than a complete number.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 02:37 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 6,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
Quote:
Originally Posted by worzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
If you can say that "you had an infinite series of nines", then you can also say that the process of moving the 9s to the left gos on for "infinity"
And at the end of the day infinity-1=infinity
Yeah, but some people have difficulty with that. If someone thinks that 1 - 0.99... doesn't equal 0 then then they presumably think that multiplying 0.99... by 10 will inrease the difference between the 9s after the decimal point by 10 also. So taking away the original 0.99... from 10 x 0.99... should leave you with 9 + (9 times the difference between 0.99... and 1).

The demonstration only works if you think that difference is 0. But it does demostrate that it makes sense to think that, in this case.
at the start of the proof your just using the form 0.9999...., your not saying it is equal to 1 it is just a way of writing down a number.

with 9.9999....-0.9999....(expressing the numbers in the same way) doesn't it seem obvious that the 0.9999.... part of the expressions cancel out? There is a 9 in the first expression for every nine in the second which just leaves the 9 to the left of the decimal point.
Worzel's concern is not that one may doubt that

9.999... - 9 = 0.999...

but rather that one may doubt that

0.999... x 10 = 9.999...

And it's a valid concern with this particular proof. Proving the latter would essentially be proving that 0.999... = 1, which means that assuming the later is assuming your conclusion.
__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2010 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 02:47 PM
Frog march Frog march is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: U.K.
Posts: 5,107
Default

0.9999....=

9/10+9/100+9/1000+9/10000.......

all you do if you multiply by 10 is turn that into

9+9/10+9/100+9/1000...... (all the denominators loose a zero)

ie 9.999..... you don't have to already assume that 0.9999....=1, just keep the number in the same format.
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 02:52 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 16,731
Default Re: Bad Math?

It's easy to summarize this thread in non-mathematical terms.

J.J. McClure: When you don't want him he's around! When you want him he's not around! I'm gonna go get a beer!
Captain Chaos: DA-DA-DUM!
(Captain Chaos disappears into the brawling mob)
J.J. McClure: I hate it when he does that!

If'n yer math's bad, then your deliverance is, ya skweel like a piggy!
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 11-May-2005, 03:29 PM
SeanF's Avatar
SeanF SeanF is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 6,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog march
0.9999....=

9/10+9/100+9/1000+9/10000.......

all you do if you multiply by 10 is turn that into

9+9/10+9/100+9/1000...... (all the denominators loose a zero)

ie 9.999..... you don't have to already assume that 0.9999....=1, just keep the number in the same format.
You're missing the point.

If 0.999... <> 1, then 1-0.999... <> 0. In other words, there's a difference between 1 and 0.999... Let's call that difference d.

If the difference between 1 and 0.999... is d, then the difference between 10*1 and 10*0.999... is 10d, but the difference between 9+1 and 9+0.999... is d.

And if that's true, and obviously 9+1 = 10*1, then that means that 9+0.999... <> 10*0.999...

Thus the proof fails.

__________________
SeanF

"Ask to understand, but don't challenge unless you have the knowledge."--NEOWatcher

The contents of this post are ©2010 by SeanF and may not be copied or retransmitted in any form without the express written consent of SeanF
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today