Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 01:42 PM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default The Phantom Time Hypothesis

Not sure precisely which fora this belongs on - it's a toss up between here and Conspiracy Theories, at a guess.



This article is discussing a claim that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by link above
..the early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never happened, but were added to the calendar long ago either by accident, by misinterpretation of documents, or by deliberate falsification by calendar conspirators.
Any thoughts?
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 02:38 PM
Dark Jaguar Dark Jaguar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 89
Default

First thought is, how dim could people have been to not notice they skipped a few hundred years by accident when making the new calenders. For some reason I feel as though if a global mistake in which the next new year brought in 2101, I think I might start asking questions. (Sorry, literal interpretation of this.)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 02:40 PM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Jaguar
First thought is, how dim could people have been to not notice they skipped a few hundred years by accident when making the new calenders. For some reason I feel as though if a global mistake in which the next new year brought in 2101, I think I might start asking questions. (Sorry, literal interpretation of this.)
Indeed. The wikipedia entry for this subject lists many problems with it, quite apart from the common sense one you point out.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 02:46 PM
Halcyon Dayz's Avatar
Halcyon Dayz Halcyon Dayz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NLD - Sol III
Posts: 1,619
Default Three Centuries Missing

Very amusing.

We have methods completely independent from documentation
to establish time-lines. Counting tree rings or C-14 analysis for instance.
No missing centuries.
__________________
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it.
Join the Illuminati
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 21-November-2005, 02:50 PM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halcyon Dayz
Very amusing.

We have methods completely independent from documentation
to establish time-lines. Counting tree rings or C-14 analysis for instance.
No missing centuries.
Yup, dendrochronological evidence is listed as a problem with this hypothesis at wiki.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 12:29 AM
genebujold's Avatar
genebujold genebujold is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lianachan
Any thoughts?
You mean aside from the ancient drawings of stars in the position of the skies, along with recorded phenomena of supernovas, the remnants of which we have measured and backwards extrapolated that have corroborated our calenders and disproved the "missing years" theory?

Uh, no.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 02:27 AM
Beleth's Avatar
Beleth Beleth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Santa Carla, California
Posts: 11
Default

It has come to my attention that many things we all take for granted as taking place didn't actually take place:

- the Moon landings
- the Holocaust
- the American Civil War
- and now, 614-911 AD.

I am therefore putting forth my hypothesis:
Nothing in history ever actually happened.
__________________
Qui nos rodunt confundantur
et cum iustis non scribantur!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 22-November-2005, 02:42 AM
LurchGS's Avatar
LurchGS LurchGS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: I can see your house from here
Posts: 3,057
Default

you mean I'm NOT 47 years old?

Not in support of this suggestion (I won't even dignify it by calling it a hypothesis).. but keep in mind, until very recently, historically speaking, the average joe didn't know, nor care, what callendar year it was. If the *church* propagated this hoax, it would have been accepted by everybody, hands down.

I think these guys missed the bus. The events they mention as not happening did indeed happen - what DIDN'T happen was this freakish callendar adjustment.

----------

the older I get, the bigger my gut
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today