Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 12:58 PM
farmerjumperdon farmerjumperdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 3,948
Default Today's Ray of Hope

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/13/na...94vD4D74xpXGqg
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective.

"Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 01:03 PM
Dragon Star's Avatar
Dragon Star Dragon Star is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lake Mary, FL
Posts: 3,744
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Star
Default

Thanks for the link.

I am still a bit wearry about this, they could be doing this just to keep from a war between Religion and Science, expecially after all of that ID stuff. Just have to wait and see...
__________________
Life is full of choices. Sometimes you make the good ones, and sometimes you have to kill all the witnesses.

Lurker
- "This is baut... we can't decide on the safety of pbj sandwiches in less than 9 pages..."
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 07:44 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,981
Default

What makes me kind of sad is that the two congregations they describe equal 106 people, which is about a third the size of the fundamentalist church some of my friends from grade school attended. I really think the many, many churches, synagogues, et al that have no problem with evolution and recognize that it doesn't have to conflict with faith need to get more vocal. The individual congregations seen one-on-one may not match in numbers, but the congregations will outbalance in the other direction.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 09:24 PM
LurchGS's Avatar
LurchGS LurchGS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: I can see your house from here
Posts: 3,057
Default

I think they were pointing out that even small, out of the way, churches are endorsing Evolution - not just the big industrial churches - further showing the IDers as fringists and loonies.

DS - I don't worry too much about organized religion vs science. There's no war there (certainly not the way there was even 200 years ago). As science makes discoveries, religion must adapt to it. (ok, science does too, but that's internal,not forced on it from outside, if you follow my drift)

And, I don't think the organized religions would hold off from a 'war' with science if they thought they had a snowball's chance in Bahgdad of winning. but maybe I'm just being cynical.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 09:36 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,511
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LurchGS
And, I don't think the organized religions would hold off from a 'war' with science if they thought they had a snowball's chance in Bahgdad of winning. but maybe I'm just being cynical.
It gets awfully cold in the desert at night, when you think no one is paying attention to what you're doing. Kinda like these stealth maneuvers IDers keep trying to pull.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 09:45 PM
LurchGS's Avatar
LurchGS LurchGS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: I can see your house from here
Posts: 3,057
Default

that would imply that the IDers have the backing of the major religions - and (at least, as far as I know) they don't.

Or am I misunderstanding you? (wouldn't be the first time I misunderstood somebody else. I could have sworn my wifeoid said 'yes', lo these many years ago)

But, I do think that if organized religion - the big houses - thought they could win a war or battle with science, they'd take it on. (I suppose the IDers could be some 'department of dirty tricks' for the Pope or whoever leads the Baptists or something ... but I doubt it. They're more sophisticated than this)

(oh, lest anybody get irate, the selections of religious entities in the preceeding paragraph are for display purposes only. They are not intended as attacks in specific, nor are they intended for individual resale)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 09:53 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,511
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Well, I read this situation thus. IDers as agents independent of organized religions are the ultimately deniable soldiers. They're perfectly willing to sacrifice themselves for the cause without any of the mainstream leadership getting bogged down when they get caught. Yet should they succeed, they'll be chanted up in the churches as "good Christians spreading the gospel" with the institutional amnesia erasing any of the denials and condemnation that might have previously been spouted when they got caught.

Religious leadership is like political leadership. Its a bad idea till it works, then it was your idea the whole time. And yes, that's raw, unrepentant, unabashed cynicism you're reading.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13-February-2006, 10:00 PM
LurchGS's Avatar
LurchGS LurchGS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: I can see your house from here
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doodler
Well, I read this situation thus. IDers as agents independent of organized religions are the ultimately deniable soldiers. They're perfectly willing to sacrifice themselves for the cause without any of the mainstream leadership getting bogged down when they get caught. Yet should they succeed, they'll be chanted up in the churches as "good Christians spreading the gospel" with the institutional amnesia erasing any of the denials and condemnation that might have previously been spouted when they got caught.

Religious leadership is like political leadership. Its a bad idea till it works, then it was your idea the whole time. And yes, that's raw, unrepentant, unabashed cynicism you're reading.
Ok, we don't really disagree - at least, it doesn't sound as though you think the Pope (or whomever) is really behind it.
Yeah, if it were to succeed, then they'd certainly jump on the band wgon and proclaim it a good thing.

God, it feels so good to be a cynic!

said by a froth-at-the-mouth two-basin kitchen cynic!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 14-February-2006, 05:04 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LurchGS
Yeah, if it were to succeed, then they'd certainly jump on the band wgon and proclaim it a good thing.
I dunno. The Catholics certainly got their fingers burned on opposing science in the past. I think the current generation at the Vatican (and, yes, it took 'em long enough to come 'round) are big into "science is over there and we're over here and let's keep it that way." Could be true of other religions, too, but I'm not as well versed in 'em.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 14-February-2006, 11:02 AM
HenrikOlsen's Avatar
HenrikOlsen HenrikOlsen is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark 55.6773° N 12.3610° E
Posts: 5,671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren
The Catholics certainly got their fingers burned on opposing science in the past.
That's one way of saying it
1769: The city of Brescia, Italy is devastated when the Church of San Nazaro, near Venice, is struck by lightning. The resulting fire ignites 200,000 lb (90,000 kg) of gunpowder being stored there, causing a massive explosion which destroys one sixth of the city and kills 3,000 people. The disaster prompts the Roman Catholic Church to abandon their religious objection to using lightning rods to protect their property.
__________________
It would be hard to imagine an uglier building that hadn't won a major architectural award.
Pratchett, Making Money
Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 14-February-2006, 01:16 PM
farmerjumperdon farmerjumperdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 3,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LurchGS
But, I do think that if organized religion - the big houses - thought they could win a war or battle with science, they'd take it on. (I suppose the IDers could be some 'department of dirty tricks' for the Pope or whoever leads the Baptists or something ... but I doubt it. They're more sophisticated than this)
Always wondered about that; who does lead the baptists? (and the Lutherans and Unitarians and Presbyterians and . . . )

Maybe they all just report directly to God. I like a nice flat org structure.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective.

"Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 14-February-2006, 02:50 PM
Doodler's Avatar
Doodler Doodler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,511
Send a message via AIM to Doodler Send a message via MSN to Doodler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmerjumperdon
Always wondered about that; who does lead the baptists? (and the Lutherans and Unitarians and Presbyterians and . . . )

Maybe they all just report directly to God. I like a nice flat org structure.
I believe they have some overagency to which they report, I don't know exactly. In the end, the overbody is primarily advisory, imposing rules through stigma and peer pressure than any actual mandate. Its not like the Catholic structure at all. The Episcopal church is the only non-Catholic branch I'm aware of with a built in superstructure going back to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Even then, some progressive churches under the Episcopal flag throw the middle digit to the Church of England and march to their own tune.
__________________
I'm not completely heartless, the doctor who removed it told me he'd never be able to get it all.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 14-February-2006, 02:54 PM
teri tait's Avatar
teri tait teri tait is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,849
Send a message via Yahoo to teri tait
Default

if it isn't about love, I don't know whot is or all blue boys look like a Knepper.
__________________
Teri berry...quite contrary, how does your garden grow?
Width, silver, bells, cockle, shells, and prithe made all in aureole
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today