Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General Interest > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 02:27 PM
Matherly Matherly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,283
Default Socialism vs Capitalism- where to begin?

NOTE: The thread is NOT about debateing the merits of either Socialism or Capitalism. Please don't go there, as I don't want this thread to be closed before I can get peoples' input on sources.

Hey all,

I am going to be involved in an informal debate in the Real World, not at BABB concerning the merits of Socialism and Capitalism. Now, I know the basics from my Micro- and MacroEconomic courses in college but I want to do some research that really looks into the two systems and criticises them both positivly and negativly (I want to avoid Straw Men versions)

My question: do any of you have any sources you would recommend? I am quite happy to go to the library so the recommended sources do not have to be on the Internet.
__________________
Carl Matherly

Offical Battlestar Galactica Apologist

Named Time Magazine's 2006 "Person of the Year"

Last edited by Matherly; 28-September-2007 at 06:31 PM. Reason: Tried to make my intent more clear.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 02:32 PM
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,492
Default

What is this "library" of which you speak?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 02:36 PM
Fazor's Avatar
Fazor Fazor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,907
Default

Can't you just copy and paste articles from wikipedia? Economics was one of my least favorite subjects, so I'm afraid I won't be much help.
__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
Lisa: "I'm so proud of you guys that I've even tipped off the local media!"
Reporter: "Yeah, and I already have the perfect headline! 'Activity Participated in by Some'! Ah, perfect!"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 02:46 PM
Celestial Mechanic's Avatar
Celestial Mechanic Celestial Mechanic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 4,416
Default

At the risk of belaboring the obvious, I would suggest going back to the seminal works of both: The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith and Das Kapital by Karl Marx.

Important disclaimer: I have read neither of these books. They would be the first two that I would consult in such a research project, but not the last. Does anyone know of more recent works on each?
__________________
Microsoft is over if you want it.

The bar has been lowered for the promotion of ATM ideas; the bar for the acceptance of ATM ideas must remain high.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 02:51 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,936
Default

Do you know the names of countries that are supposed to be either capitalist or socialist? If you do, you can look up information on them and compare them. The CIA factbook might be helpful for a quick overview of countries.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 03:01 PM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 930
Default

On the other side of the time spectrum, the two hottest books related to capitalism that just came out are "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" by Naomi Klein and "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World" by Alan Greenspan. Since these books just came out and are making waves, there's a good chance they might come up in your debate. I'd check out both of them before the debate.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 03:14 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,505
Default

I can't offer much on this from an academic standpoint, but I do think that there are definitely certain areas of society where capitalistic competition makes utterly no sense (and of course many areas where it does). My main example is electric utilities. Would it make sense if many different competing companies were stringing their own separate transmission lines all over our cities and towns? That would be utter insanity. It would be an unneeded duplication of effort and expense that all consumers would end up paying for. There are many other excellent examples where "socialism" makes perfect economic sense.

The problem is, the word "socialism" carries such a bad connotation in the U.S. It is inevitably associated with Marxian socialism and therefore a stepping stone to communism. In the current world, this is ridiculous, but the ignorance and biases of Americans are, unfortunately, well rooted.

It's a matter of framing. Whoever is allowed to frame an argument has an almost insurmountable advantage. Obviously health care in the U.S. is a major problem. We've got hundreds or thousands of insurance companies that all want to maximize their profits, but at whose expense? Well, it's the patients. I think a central system would be a workable solution, but of course this would mean millions of people would lose their insurance company jobs. And once the argument is framed as "socialized medicine," well, you can just forget that potential solution simply because of the stigma attached to the word.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 03:19 PM
Fazor's Avatar
Fazor Fazor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,907
Default

Cougar, the OP expressly asked that we not discuss the merits/drawbacks to either of these two systems, but rather was asking where he can find good reference material on the subject.
__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
Lisa: "I'm so proud of you guys that I've even tipped off the local media!"
Reporter: "Yeah, and I already have the perfect headline! 'Activity Participated in by Some'! Ah, perfect!"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 05:49 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

If you have access to an educational institution (a public library may qualify) you can login to JSTOR - it's a electronic source for academic papers. Just go there, do a search, and you've got everything you need.
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 05:54 PM
farmerjumperdon farmerjumperdon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 3,974
Default

The problem with trying to draw real world comparisons is that I do not think any of the basic appraoches (capitalism, market planning, socialism, communism) even exist in their pure form. Most, if not all countries, practice some hybrid.

I'd just hand in the following quote and call it a day:

Capitalism is where man takes advantage of his fellow man. Communism is the other way around.

Can't remember the source.
__________________
Don of Borg - Cool, Calm, Collective.

"Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 05:56 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by farmerjumperdon View Post
Capitalism is where man takes advantage of his fellow man. Communism is the other way around.
And socialism is where they do it nicely?
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 06:00 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazor View Post
Cougar, the OP expressly asked that we not discuss the merits/drawbacks to either of these two systems, but rather was asking where he can find good reference material on the subject.
Y-y-y-yeah. At second glance, the OP seems extremely ambiguous. I quote:

Quote:
The thread is NOT about debateing the merits of either Socialism or Capitalism....

I am going to be involved in an informal debate concerning the merits of Socialism and Capitalism.

I want to do some research that really looks into the two systems and criticises them both positivly and negativly...

...do any of you have any sources you would recommend?
So Matherly is going to be in a "debate concerning the merits of Socialism and Capitalism," but this thread is not about debating the merits of Socialism and Capitalism?

My intent was to give Matherly some ideas that might be used in such a debate, myself being a "source"... of some experience.

But OK, fine. Point, point, point elsewhere, but surely don't include any content here.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 06:07 PM
Fazor's Avatar
Fazor Fazor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,907
Default

Sorry I don't mean to censor anyone, not that I have that right or ability anyway. Just don't want this to end up down the enevadable path that is political debate when discussing the two subjects.

And for the record, when I read the first two lines of the OP I had to do a double take. It does look funny "This thread is not about this" "I'm going to be debating this"
__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
Lisa: "I'm so proud of you guys that I've even tipped off the local media!"
Reporter: "Yeah, and I already have the perfect headline! 'Activity Participated in by Some'! Ah, perfect!"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 06:20 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,980
Default

I know I keep repeating myself, but I thought Karl Popper's Open Society and Its Enemies, Volume II had an interesting dicussion of the flaws of capitalism and the motivations behind communism and fascism, in the run-up to World War II. You may think WWII is ancient history, but it was a decisive moment for these ideologies, and the prelude to the Cold War.

For lighter reading, anything by George Orwell, especially Animal Farm.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 06:28 PM
Matherly Matherly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,283
Default Re-worded OP

I have re-worded the OP. Sorry about the confusion

(And for the record, I am looking for source material I can read up on and possibly quote in my debate in the "real world")
__________________
Carl Matherly

Offical Battlestar Galactica Apologist

Named Time Magazine's 2006 "Person of the Year"
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 06:46 PM
Demigrog's Avatar
Demigrog Demigrog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,172
Default

Most of the suggestions so far are selling a particular viewpoint. I'd go with an introductory Economics college textbook, to get a generally well rounded discussion. And drink caffine, lots of caffine.
__________________
Do try not to take me too seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 07:04 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demigrog View Post
Most of the suggestions so far are selling a particular viewpoint. I'd go with an introductory Economics college textbook, to get a generally well rounded discussion.
That's buying into a particular viewpoint, too.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 07:13 PM
Delvo Delvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Default

An Economics textbook would only cover capitalism; to include socialism, you'd need an introductory Political Science textbook... unless what you're relly interested in is not socialism itself (a type of government) but the kind of economy that's typically associated with such governments... in which the words to watch for are "Command Economy" and "Wealth Redistribution".
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 07:38 PM
Cougar's Avatar
Cougar Cougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 4,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Demigrog View Post
And drink caffine, lots of caffine.
Oh, that's just so capitalista!

[Just joking, of course. I think.]
__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 07:54 PM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,213
Default

if you are going to debate the merits of the two systems and try to figure out which is "better", just ask yourself which one better applies to basic human nature when they get together in societies.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 07:59 PM
tofu tofu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: florida, USA
Posts: 2,491
Default

A real man would do the entire debate quoting only Heinlein.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 09:18 PM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

Really, you can't go wrong with primary sources.

Capitalism:

Wealth of Nations
The Fable of the Bees
Atlas Shrugged
The World is Flat
The Road to Serfdom
Capitalism and Freedom

Communism/Socialism:

Communist Manifesto
Das Kapital
What Is to Be Done?
The Prerequisites for Socialism and the Tasks of Social Democracy
Social Reform or Revolution
Chairman Mao's Little Red Book

And, as a general reference:

Oxford Dictionary of Politics
Oxford Dictionary of the Social Sciences
Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy
Oxford Companion to Philosophy
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 09:38 PM
Van Rijn's Avatar
Van Rijn Van Rijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 11,640
Default

Atlas Shrugged is a primary source? I'd recommend leaving that novel until later. If you want to read up on Ayn Rand's ideas, I'd suggest some of her non-fiction collections, like Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal which also has some essays by other authors.

But let's be clear: Pretty much everything on the subject is going to come with a point of view, and often isn't going to have much to do with the real world. For instance, what Marx wrote about, and what actually came about in the real world, are two very different things.
__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Last edited by Van Rijn; 29-September-2007 at 12:00 AM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 11:35 PM
Gruesome's Avatar
Gruesome Gruesome is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Greenville, South Caroliney
Posts: 672
Default

I don't want to get off on a rant here...

So, I wont.

However, if one is seeking reference material on the OP's question, I would simply point the OP to history. Compare the RESULTS of past and present nations with the respective INTENT of each economic philosophy.

We all want to go to Mars, but which is the best approach to get us there?
__________________
"It was a crime of passion! Not premeditated dentistry!"
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 28-September-2007, 11:56 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 9,210
Default

As scientists, we like evidence. With one, we have records dating back from the ancient Greeks to look at, with the other, only from the 19th century to today.
Quote:
We all want to go to Mars, but which is the best approach to get us there?
To give me a rocket, a space suit and a camera and count down.
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"Carl Sagan sent a message to ET,
Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility
Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity
Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 29-September-2007, 01:51 AM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,936
Default

Reading primary sources would be helpful background if you have the time, but if I wanted to compare two cars I would look at their real world performance and reliability. So if I was comparing socialism and capitalism I would compare the two in action, not in theory. Now if your debate is anything at all like a typical debate it will probably an exercise in futility as there will be no agreed upon definition of what exactly socialism or capitalism is in practice and so it will be very difficult to compare the two. This problem might be solved by getting an agreed upon definition of the terms prior to the debate, but this might prove impossible. So instead you could go into the debate and instead demonstrate how futile the debate is by showing how on the definition you use puts countries most people assume are capitalist into the socialist group or countries that most peple assume are socialist into the capitalist group. A crude measure such as defining a socialist country as one in which the government collects more than 50% of GDP in taxes is better than nothing. This is crude because it ignores how much "wealth" is held by the public sector.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 29-September-2007, 02:16 AM
novaderrik's Avatar
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Henning, MN, USA
Posts: 3,213
Default

just read the Communist manifesto and the US Constitution..
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 29-September-2007, 02:30 AM
The Supreme Canuck's Avatar
The Supreme Canuck The Supreme Canuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 6,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
Atlas Shrugged is a primary source?
I'd defend it as such. Not as any sort of scholarly work, but as expounding a certain viewpoint and as a way of looking at the world. Clearly it isn't up to the same standard as, say, Wealth of Nations, but it has value nonetheless.
__________________
Quaeso quousque humi defixa tua mens erit? Nonne aspicis, quae in templa veneris?
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 29-September-2007, 02:47 AM
Delvo Delvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Default

But it didn't lead to anything; no political historical movements or events came from it.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 29-September-2007, 02:56 AM
IsaacKuo's Avatar
IsaacKuo IsaacKuo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
just read the Communist manifesto and the US Constitution..
Not being a Constitutional scholar, I have to ask...What does the US Constitution have to say (or not say) about Capitalism?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did Life Begin In Space? New Evidence From Comets ToSeek Life in Space 14 24-August-2007 02:19 PM
For the CLOWNS of the forum Chook Off-Topic Babbling 458 09-July-2006 06:21 AM
Astronomers Begin a Massive Survey of the Milky Way Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 0 07-December-2005 09:31 PM
Cassini Ready to Begin Its Saturn Tour Fraser Universe Today Story Comments 0 13-September-2005 02:01 PM
Cassini & Lightning On Saturn-When Will The Search Begin Mr. Milton Banana Space Exploration 7 05-July-2004 02:50 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today