Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 09:30 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default So, you think your SUV motor is big

Take a look at this internal combustion engine. Scroll to the bottom for some cool pics.

http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/

Note that it can only spin at 102 RPM.

Quote:
The Wartsila-Sulzer RTA96-C turbocharged two-stroke diesel engine is the most powerful and most efficient prime-mover in the world today. The Aioi Works of Japan's Diesel United, Ltd built the first engines and is where some of these pictures were taken.

It is available in 6 through 14 cylinder versions, all are inline engines. These engines were designed primarily for very large container ships. Ship owners like a single engine/single propeller design and the new generation of larger container ships needed a bigger engine to propel them.

The cylinder bore is just under 38" and the stroke is just over 98". Each cylinder displaces 111,143 cubic inches (1820 liters) and produces 7780 horsepower. Total displacement comes out to 1,556,002 cubic inches (25,480 liters) for the fourteen cylinder version.

Some facts on the 14 cylinder version:
Total engine weight: 2300 tons (The crankshaft alone weighs 300 tons.)
Length: 89 feet
Height: 44 feet
Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102 rpm
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 09:32 PM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucson_Tim View Post
Note that it can only spin at 102 RPM.
At that size, one rotation is such a long trip that it better pack some snacks.
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 09:34 PM
Fazor's Avatar
Fazor Fazor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,854
Default

They featured these (or similar) on "How It's Made" the other week. Amazing. The irony is thinking about how many engines it would take to move the engine to the shipyard.
__________________
I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 09:36 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default

Since it's a two-stroke, I wonder if it makes that "ra-na-na-na-na-na" noise.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 10:29 PM
Trebuchet's Avatar
Trebuchet Trebuchet is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The great NorthWet
Posts: 1,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucson_Tim View Post
Since it's a two-stroke, I wonder if it makes that "ra-na-na-na-na-na" noise.
Just very slowly...

Years ago I got a tour of a natural gas pipeline pumping station which had engines (powered by the product, of course) which much have approached that size. I was standing next to a cylindrical object the size of a garbage can when the guide pointed out that it was a piston which had been removed in a previous overhaul. I hadn't recognized it because of the size.

I suppose the owners like single engine/single propeller designs for cost but if I was the captain I think I'd vote for some redundancy.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 25-October-2007, 10:30 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
I suppose the owners like single engine/single propeller designs for cost but if I was the captain I think I'd vote for some redundancy.
Yes. I didn't agree with that statement either.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 12:00 AM
Zachary Zachary is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 388
Send a message via MSN to Zachary
Default

Wow. How long do you think it'll be before somebody puts one in a car?
__________________
"Bessie Braddock to Churchill "Winston, your drunk!"
Churchill: "Bessie, you're ugly, and tomorrow morning I shall be sober""

the solar system
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 12:06 AM
Noclevername's Avatar
Noclevername Noclevername is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachary View Post
Wow. How long do you think it'll be before somebody puts one in a car?
More like build a car aound one!
__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 06:34 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,375
Default

Thats the kind of thing my Dad used to look after for a living. Until he retired he was a Marine Cgief Engineer. He started on Steam in the 50s and finshed his days on big Diesel plant. He was the comissioning Engineer on a couple of big Tankers built in Japanese yards for British clients in the early 70s.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 06:50 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
Thats the kind of thing my Dad used to look after for a living. Until he retired he was a Marine Cgief Engineer. He started on Steam in the 50s and finshed his days on big Diesel plant. He was the comissioning Engineer on a couple of big Tankers built in Japanese yards for British clients in the early 70s.
That must have been interesting work.

Being around LARGE machinery is sort of exciting. I worked in a steel mill for a while when I was younger and being next to and watching 50,000 HP electric motors "roll" the steel ingots was cool. The BOF was also "thrilling" to watch. Hard to explain.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 07:12 PM
Larry Jacks Larry Jacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,618
Default

I suppose the owners like single engine/single propeller designs for cost but if I was the captain I think I'd vote for some redundancy.

So would I but apparently the engines have proven so reliable that redundancy isn't required. There are a lot of those container ships out there. I don't recall many of them having problems with engine failures. If container ships were being endangered or lost due to engine failures then they'd be building them with more than one engine.

As Bill Lear used to say, the more stuff you have, the more things there are to break.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 07:47 PM
Delvo Delvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,251
Default

Also, having one good engine out of two might not help anyway because then all of your thrust would be on one side of the hull...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 07:57 PM
Captain Kidd's Avatar
Captain Kidd Captain Kidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,123
Default

Which is what the rudder's for. It'd just be hard to make a turn to the side that the working prop's on.

With an unfortunate name, Shafting a Ship is a good article about how many shafts a ship should have.

Quote:
The first consideration is weight economy. The propeller, shaft and gearing all represent dead weight that is duplicated with multi-shaft arrangements. In addition, the curve of engine output power as compared to size and weight is not linear; two smaller engines together weigh substantially more than a single larger unit of the same output. It may, therefore, seem that an ideal arrangement will involve keeping such duplication, that is the number of shafts, down to a bare minimum. Provided the total power in question is below the maximum that can be absorbed by a single propeller, then a single shaft arrangement would seem to be the most efficient. If the installed power is greater than the maximum that can be absorbed by a propeller, then the most efficient arrangement would be that involving the fewest number of shafts; in most cases two. Another way of saying this is that the most efficient design for shafting is to load the propellers as highly (that is, to put as much power through) as possible.

For merchant ships this is indeed the case. Merchant ships are designed for economy of construction and use, not for the most efficient use of high power settings. In their case, the economic advantages of a single shaft outweigh any disadvantages from the layout.
The article then goes on to show that that's not the case for warships due to needing redundant propulsion providers, the ability to provide steering via the props, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2007, 10:08 PM
Larry Jacks Larry Jacks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,618
Default

Some cruise ships have the diesel engines turn generators that in turn power electric motors mounted in steerable pods. The arrangement allows some very large ships to cruise efficiently and then dock without need for tugs.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2007, 02:10 PM
captain swoop's Avatar
captain swoop captain swoop is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 5,375
Default

Most Tugs use directed thrust now.They have an Azimuth Propulsor' and don't have rudders at all.
__________________
'The eye can only see what the mind is prepared to accept'
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2007, 04:31 PM
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ashby, MN, USA
Posts: 2,541
Default

why must everyone always compare a big engine to an SUV engine?
most light duty trucks don't even have "big" engines any more. the biggest common gasoline engines i can think of are right at 6.2 liters- about 370 or so cubic inches.
the light truck diesels are i think at around 6.5 liters.
not exactly "big", when you can get a 7 liter (427) in a Corvette (one that makes over 500hp, gets 26 mpg, and weighs around 400 pounds. gotta love technology). go back 30 years ago, and you could get 500" torque monsters in mid sized Cadillacs, and 440"-460" engines in pretty much everything else.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2007, 04:44 PM
Ronald Brak Ronald Brak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,456
Default

I just realized my car engine and my skull both have the same capacity.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2007, 05:09 PM
Tucson_Tim Tucson_Tim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,825
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
why must everyone always compare a big engine to an SUV engine?.
Ah jeez. Lighten up.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 27-October-2007, 05:55 PM
darkhunter's Avatar
darkhunter darkhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,136
Default

The last SUV I had had a smaller engine than my last project car....

The pickup I have now has an engine nearly twice the size of what my sons car has. I don't currently have a project car for comparison
__________________
"Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it." — Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man

441!!!! :)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 28-October-2007, 09:45 AM
SMEaton's Avatar
SMEaton SMEaton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 326
Default

"We threw a rod!"
"How high did it go?"
"This particular rod was in compression Sir. She went up about 10 feet. Four people injured, luckily there was no one next to it..."
"And?"
"Well, you might want to alert the deck crew. The upper deck is covered white from bird, umm, perturbation."
Probably not technically accurate, but I've had this hilarious image in my head after first reading this thread and the scale involved. Particularly the "how high?".
I thought the compression and consequent pressure might shoot that sucker straight up one or two hundred feet, but then I thought of the massiveness of the rod-piston system, and decided that that was a huge overestimation.
__________________
pax et veritas

Last edited by SMEaton; 28-October-2007 at 10:18 AM. Reason: the killer of humor: explanation
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 14-December-2007, 08:45 PM
publiusr publiusr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,292
Default

I want to assemble one in space with Sea Dragon launches.

Imagine that used to power a drill thru the moon.
Reply With Quote