Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 12:04 AM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 7,086
Default

In evolutionary terms, favorable adaptation refers to the local environment. In the current local environment, you don't use guns, you use lawyers and the mass media.
__________________
The Devil offered me power. I told him I preferred aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 02:11 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
(Note that I don't say Caucasian; my ancestors aren't from the Caucasus region.)
No, your ancestors are from Africa. Just like all the rest of us.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 02:21 AM
Jens's Avatar
Jens Jens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post

Let me remind you that the Native Americans ruled this land well and wisely for millenia before we came in and reduced them to "reservations" and handed them whiskey.
I generally agree with your sentiments, but I do think that this is a somewhat romantic view. The Native Americans did the best they could, of course, but in reality there was a lot of intertribal warfare and competition for resources, as there was everywhere else in the world. I think that the rise of any major political force was hampered by the interesting fact that there were basically no domesticable animals in the New World. There were no chickens, no pigs, no cows. But in any case, like in many places in the world, they tried to make a livelihood from the resources they had, and fought one another for resources. This is no different from peoples around the world.

But I also think that if they want to secede, that should be a right. They will likely face significant difficulties, as people who secede usually do. Look at Eritrea or Timor Leste.
__________________
As above, so below
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 03:56 AM
novaderrik novaderrik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ashby, MN, USA
Posts: 2,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Bold Mine:


Reading this post inspires me to feel anger

The tone is racist, implicative that Native Americans are good for nothing welfare suckers and manual labor.

Let me remind you that the Native Americans ruled this land well and wisely for millenia before we came in and reduced them to "reservations" and handed them whiskey.

Your post is disgusting.

It makes me want to rant- but apparently I would be wrong for doing so and your post is perfectly acceptable- Im just imagining things
lighten up- you know what i meant. just like any other group, they get a lot of handouts from our federal government. i use "welfare" as kind of an umbrella term to refer to anything that our government does for them or gives to them or anyone else..
and the "jobs we won't do" is a jab at the current debate over what the defenders of the ILLEGAL immigrants that flood across our southern border on a daily basis say they are here to do- an argument that anyone with more than 3 functional brain cells knows is a load of the stuff that comes out of the back of a cow.
and, besides, 3/8 of me is native American, with the other 5/8 being pure European white trash of various origins- so i can pick on whoever i want because i can't help myself due to my inferior pedigree. well, maybe i can't pick on African people, or Asians, or Middle eastern people, or the indigenous people of Australia- but anyone else is fair game.
so, i'll say it again- let them secede. they'll be back when things get tough.
__________________
"blacker than the blackest black... times infinity."- Nathan Explosion
The.. Best.. Thread..Ever...
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 05:12 AM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jens View Post
No, your ancestors are from Africa. Just like all the rest of us.
True, true. However, if we are to look at where my ancestors came from within the last 2000 years or so, it's Western Europe, not the Caucasus. (And, well, probably India, though I'm not sure that particular question has been resolved, and if you go back to when the last ancestor of that particular ethnic group left Europe, she was my only Eastern European ancestor--from Czechoslovkia, though I don't know what country it is now.)
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 09:57 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Verginia Crater
Posts: 11,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
lighten up- you know what i meant.
Going by your post, it seems I didn't.

But lightening up happens when a person gets to explaining misunderstandings

Jens, I don't think I'm partaking in a "romantic" view of the native American Lifestyle pre-US conquest.

I think I am looking at it subjectively. I am well aware of the scrounging and inter-tribal and extra-tribal warfares.

And there were also many tribes that were no better than disgusting, slobbish scavengers eating raw rotting meat.(that is not a snub- a very accurate description)

However, overall, the benefits of most of the tribes lifestyle were far superior, in many ways, to the current ones. There were also drawbacks.

There are also many misconceptions still floating around today about tribal lifestyle.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 01:19 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
from Czechoslovkia, though I don't know what country it is now.)
It's 2. Just replace the first 'o' with a blank (well, kinda)
And when was that? It probably wasn't Czechoslovakia at the time.

(Oh boy, I get to point out a spelling error to Gillianren...joy, joy, even if it is an innocent typo)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
Quote:
lighten up- you know what i meant.
Going by your post, it seems I didn't.
Well; I'm with you on that previous post because I do see that stereotype. I don't know what the welfare statistics are, but I don't see that stereotype as much as I used to. Although; it has been replaced by the gambling stereotype, which probably isn't any better.

I felt the "post is disgusting" can be interpreted as a personal attack rather than "post sounds disgusting". It is a subtle difference, but it could mean a big change in the readers impression.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 02:25 PM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Verginia Crater
Posts: 11,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
I felt the "post is disgusting" can be interpreted as a personal attack rather than "post sounds disgusting". It is a subtle difference, but it could mean a big change in the readers impression.
It is subtle, and I haven't decided yet if I agree with you or not. By directing the comment at the post itself, not the person, i figured it was the same effect- But I'll bear it in mind.

Don't want novaderrik thinking I find him or his other posts bad in any way- Normally we agree on most things and I can only think of two posts he has ever made that caused aggravation with me- and that was one of them
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 02:34 PM
Delvo Delvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,251
Default

This thread is the first place I've ever seen the people called "Lakotan(s)", as if they were the people of a place called "Lakota". To me, "Lakota" has always been the name of the people... but then what would the country be called? Calling it "Lakota" would be a bit like calling England "English". Maybe it would be named with a word in the Lakota language that has nothing to do with the name "Lakota"...
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 02:58 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delvo View Post
...but then what would the country be called? ...
Lakos?
Yeah; it does sound a bit trekkie.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 05:57 PM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: McMinnville, Oregon
Posts: 7,086
Default

I suppose you could just ask a member of the tribe about a preferred spelling.
__________________
The Devil offered me power. I told him I preferred aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 07:00 PM
Moostang Moostang is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 20
Default

I think this attempt will be as successful as their attempts get the Black Hills returned to them.
Its sad the things that happen on some of these reservations, especially to the children now (my MIL works at a home for these kids and her b/f is Lakota and is very active in the tribe), becoming their own nation would only make these situations worse and would make it hard to get some of these children placed in better situations. From what I have seen some if not most of the tribes wouldn't be able to afford to have special homes for these abused kids, the casino monies don't make it a lot of these kids, what assistance they do get comes from the government commodities.
__________________
-Sabrina
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 07:14 PM
Gillianren's Avatar
Gillianren Gillianren is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 12,824
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
It's 2. Just replace the first 'o' with a blank (well, kinda)
And when was that? It probably wasn't Czechoslovakia at the time.

(Oh boy, I get to point out a spelling error to Gillianren...joy, joy, even if it is an innocent typo)
I know it's two. The Czech Republic and Slovakia. (You'd want a hyphen.) I knew where it was in the 1980s, when I studied it; I don't think we established at the time what country it had been in when she lived there. I feel vaguely ashamed of this, actually.
__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 07:18 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 7,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
I know it's two. The Czech Republic and Slovakia. (You'd want a hyphen.)
Hyphen?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
I knew where it was in the 1980s, when I studied it; I don't think we established at the time what country it had been in when she lived there. I feel vaguely ashamed of this, actually.
Well, I won't hold it against you. My heritage is Czech. Austro-Hungarian in there somewhere... but the region will always be Czech whether it's own country or not.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 07:45 PM
sarongsong's Avatar
sarongsong sarongsong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
...Let me remind you that the Native Americans ruled this land well and wisely for millenia...
"Ruled"? More like "lived in harmony with".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
...I don't think I'm partaking in a "romantic" view of the native American Lifestyle pre-US conquest...I am well aware of the scrounging and inter-tribal and extra-tribal warfares. And there were also many tribes that were no better than disgusting, slobbish scavengers eating raw rotting meat.(that is not a snub- a very accurate description)...
"A very accurate description"---based on what?
__________________
*
Reply With Quote
Old 21-December-2007, 07:50 PM
tofu
This message has been deleted by tofu. Reason: I think it's a little harsh.
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 07:56 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 7,779
Default

Quote:
No, your ancestors are from Africa. Just like all the rest of us.
I believe you mean "like all the other posters who are human."
__________________
"If you think the LHC will create black holes, you might as well believe Hobbits are at the bottom of your garden."- Dr. Mike Inglis
Rovers forever! - ToSeek
"Carl Sagan sent a message to ET,
Neil Armstrong walked in the Sea of Tranquility
Steve Squyers built Spirit and Opportunity
Dan Haylen upchucked in zero gravity." -Brent Simon, The Space Camp Song
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 21-December-2007, 08:20 PM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Verginia Crater
Posts: 11,906
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong View Post
"Ruled"? More like "lived in harmony with".
That is better worded. Thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarongsong View Post
"A very accurate description"---based on what?
There were a few tribes by the pacific that would qualify - by today's langauge- as "white trash."

Happens in the best of families I guess
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 22-December-2007, 04:15 AM
Krel Krel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novaderrik View Post
besides, 3/8 of me is native American,
One hundred percent of me is native American!

As are Canadians, and Mexicans, and American Indians. But as this is the United States of American, we are Americans.

Today the flavor is native American. At one time it was Amerindian. There were others that I don't remember, and am too lazy to look them up. What will it be tomorrow? Native Aborigine?

Or maybe that one should be reserved for the lost people that anthropologist say inhabited this land before the Indians got here.

NATIVE? HA! They're descendents of immigrants, just like the rest of us.

These people are whistling in the wind. As was pointed out earlier, awhile back some States tried to exercise their Constitutional right to secede. It ended badly. The Indian nations are in no better position, and are probably in a worse one. Because no matter what the lip service there is to autonomy, they still have to answer to, and dance to Uncle Sam's tune.

David.
Reply With Quote