This topic is very interesting, dont be so quick to brush it off saying im a kook lol but this is some fascinating stuff.

http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2002/10/55826
http://chicagoiands.org/stories/Mark%20Sauer
http://www.skepticalinvestigations....o/vanLommel.htm


One things for sure this research raises way more questions than answers.

In addition to the cited reasons, endorphins, learned information and behavior, and something called dreaming should be included, all of which continue, apparently at levels sometimes not detected by our current instruments, in an intact brain for a short while after other body functions either slow down or cease. Such investigations are reminiscent of well-documented accounts of severed heads briefly retaining control of various facial muscle reactions. Oddly enough, a lot of these reports are from the period of the French Revolution. Accounts such as those in the OP would have more impact if they documented such things occurring in a brain that had significantly deteriorated due to a lack of blood supply over a period of a few days.

Re the blind folks, the article doesn't mention how long they had been blind. Plus, even if blind at birth, such persons would certainly develop their own unique mental imagery for what was inputted by the other senses and learning, including a sense of body image.

Always be wary of a "scientist" who throws around the word "miracle".

__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.

A little summary of the articles would be nice so people can decide if they want to take the time reading them. For example:

The first article has a person who says that consciousness has no physical essense. Which is odd, because no one who has had their brain removed has retained consciousness, providing strong circumstancial evidence that all those physically measurable electrical signals coursing through the brain have something to do with consciousness.

And so on.

Exactly.

Believe it or not, I have been dead twice.

No near death experiences here.

Came close myself.

Hepactic coma from liver failure. It sucked mightily but I came back. It was going into it that was weird, but nothing like you'ld heard. Be as sick as you've every been in your whole life. Be told by your personal physician for the last six years you ain't gonna make it 8 hours because as of the last blood test, you you have no liver function left, THEN begin to experience visual disturbanses you believe are the begining of desolution. (The term for when your mind goes away because the chemical processes that form it have stopped.) THAT is a near death experience.

If Einstien is correct and EVERYTHING is relative to the observer, then to me a near death experiance looks like a computer monitor who's horizontal lines of pixals looked liked dynamite fuse burning at different speeds, from left to right and when the image of the room I was in was gone, so was I.

And then I woke up. The nurse touched my wrist to time me out. She was looking at her watch when I peeked at her. She immediately got my doctor who camre in and gave me a really big, "Are we glad to see you!" He was truely amazed. I don't apologize for not dying. Stuff started working again. What can I say. I have the medical records to prove it. Plus, by typing now, it's a strong indicator I didn't die 12 years ago.

If Mr Brak or Mr Hutchinson have their ears on, my AST and ALT levels were so high my kidneys were failing, yet had no trace of jaundice. Not even corneal. A condition unique to a medication I was taking at the time to control siezures. Since pulled off the market.

I "fired" a new personal physician who looked me square in the face and said, "No. That doesn't happen". I immediately wanted another doctor.

(I actually wanted to physically assault him for his smarm, but I didn't. Bad form, you know. Like hitting a priest, only worse. Priests aren't as organzed. You'll stop getting "the good help" after that.)

__________________
Gimme a minute to read through Jay's latest observations...

What is the definition of being dead? Is it when your heart stops or when brain functions cease or are both necessary for the term to apply? I just wonder if I have been using the term incorrectly as I have been saying for the past 17 yrs that I died 4 times. Technically, my heart just stopped 4 times, once when the paramedic arrived on the scene, he said he had to revive me, then three more times during surgery. Could you even survive if your brain stops functioning? All I know is I didn't have any wacky experiences. To me it was just walking down the sidewalk, stopping to light a cigarette, seeing a deli across the street, suddenly craving Dorito's, nothing, then waking in a hospital bed, not knowing who I was or why I was there. The odd thing is, the first surgery was just to stabalize me. I don't remember this but my mother and my sister were in recovery, the first time I had any level of consciousness. They said I didn't open my eyes, didn't say a word, I just brought my hand up to smoke a phantom cigarette, the very last thing I was doing before I got hit. Of course, that's how I got busted smoking which I never thought was fair.

We had a co-worker suffer a massive heart attack recently. This person was revived. They indicated that there was no light to go towards and that they in fact had no recollection of anything until they awakened in recovery.

I had my heart stopped during open heart - but its function was handled by a machine so that doesn't count. My brain was still getting oxygen and they were able to restart it no problem.

__________________
Spock Jenkins of the Vulcan Jenkins'.

The Mind's Sky, Human Intelligence in a Cosmic Context by Timothy Ferris gets into this a bit, with a scientifically sensible explanation. I recommend anything written by Timothy Ferris, starting with The Red Limit.

__________________
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

Not odd at all, when you think about it. There were an awful lot of beheadings during the Revolution, and they were all pretty closely--in two sense of the word!--observed. A lot of the aristos were of a scientific or semi-scientific bent, and they actually asked people to observe them to see how long their heads kept moving.

And Closetgeek, the definition of "dead" is pretty fluid these days for just such reasons. When you have neither heartbeat nor brain activity, you're pretty dead, but it's possible to meet past clinical standards of dead and still be alive to certain current medical professionals.

__________________
Gillian

"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

"You can't erase icing."

"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

The light, the feeling of well-being, the out of body sensations, are all symptoms of anoxia. Talk to any airman who has had training with a high altitude chamber test. I have passed out from anoxia, and I felt wonderful.

The difficulty in actually pronouncing people dead is why in first aid there's fairly strict rules about when you're allowed to stop resuscitation.

Basically the person has to be decapitated or rotting for you to not try to resuscitate him.

If you've had training in first aid and stops trying for anything less, you could in theory be charged with criminal neglect (or whatever it's called when you know how to help someone and don't do it).

All this with the caveat that that's how I was taught first aid, possibly others do it differently.

__________________
It would be hard to imagine an uglier building that hadn't won a major architectural award.
Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.

In my considered opinion, that's really, really, really weird. Dr Hutchinson might have an opinion that's a little more professional and not based upon information acquired off the back of cereal packets.

I had a possible NDE when I was 7 or 8. No lights-and-tunnel, no dead relatives, I just remember running through the house one minute, the next waking up and being told I'd smashed my head and my Dad had to give me CPR and mouth-to-mouth.

I've had dreams with out-of-body experiences, and sometimes I remember traumatic things from that "outside myself" point of view too. But no evidence it's anything but a trick of perception.

__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort

The first article actually does mention this...this research is interesting though, what do you guys think though is this research bogus or it has some validity?

The first article, the only one I bothered to look at, has a guy asking for hundreds of thousands of dollars to do research into the survival of consciousness after death. This guy says that consciousness has no physical essence. That statement is bizarre. We have vast amounts of data that indicate that the physical state of the human brain is intimately related to consciousness. I wouldn't pay that person to wash test tubes, let alone give them a huge sum of money to do research with.

Not that my Phys Ed teacher was a lawyer or anything, but when I was taught CPR back in high school 25 years ago we were told almost the same thing. CPR is to continue until I was relieved by a professional or were physically incapable of continuing. Tag teaming was allowed but only a professional could decide that CPR can be stopped.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_rescue

In the department of not-so-scientific research, as I recall, Houdini had arrangements with his wife for after death signals from him, if possible. The results were negative.

Bogus. People have been serching for conclusive, non-subjective evidence since time began, and found zilch.

__________________
"If this were play'd upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction."
Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Illuminati's Razor-The most complicatedly evil answer is usually the most correct answer. - Fazor
"Every book is a children's book if the kid can read." - Mitch Hedberg
"Distance doesn’t matter much in space, where if you just start a thing off with the right kind of shove, sooner or later it will get where you want it to go." -Frederik Pohl, Mining the Oort

Is this topic considered debunked then?

There isn't any scientific evidence of a mind without a functioning brain.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: