|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Seems a ways from any significant population areas:
Quote:
__________________
* |
|
||||
|
These earthquakes are getting a little out of the way lately. Here in Mexicali we have been experimenting one most every day and sometimes even 2 or more times a day for aproximately 2 and a half weeks now.
Fortunately, we have not had a very strong one, the strongest I think was about 5.3 but sure enough to scare you. Why this has been happening lately is still not very clear, the only thing the news has mentioned is that it is do to a new fault discovered recently here in the area. Titana
__________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius (and a lot of courage) to move in the opposite direction....Albert Einstein. |
|
||||
|
Very indirectly. The northward movement of the Pacific plate relative to the North America plate is a continuation of a much older tectonic sequence - the over-riding of the Farallon plate by the NA plate. There are two remnants of the Farallon plate left - the Cocos to the south of the San Andreas fault and the Juan de Fuca to the north. The rest of the Farallon has been subsumed beneath the continental crust of North America.
The interaction between that plate and the bottom of the NA plate is what geologists believe is causing the the Basin & Range province to 'stretch' or extend. This extension causes the crust to break up into fault blocks and tilt - much like dominoes would. The blocks slide against one another as 'normal' faults. The resulting landscape has been described as "caterpillars marching north". The recent earthquake in Nevada is undoubtedly a consequence of one of these normal faults slipping a bit. I haven't checked the USGS website yet to see the seismologic interpretation yet, but that's my bet. For an interesting read on the area, take a look at Geology of the Great Basin, by Bill Fiero. John Mcphee's Basin and Range is also excellent - it's more of an essay than Fiero's book, but McPhee is an accomplished lay-geologist. I love the Basin & Range area and the Mojave desert. |
|
||||
|
I checked the USGS page on this quake - definitely a normal fault movement. The beachball (moment tensor sloution) shows a bit of slip, but that's not unusual.
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/eq_depot/2..._nsa9_cmt.html |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| British Columbia Earthquake | Blob | General Science | 12 | 15-February-2007 06:09 AM |
| A Nice Little Earthquake | PetersCreek | Off-Topic Babbling | 13 | 03-August-2006 10:14 AM |
| Beijing Earthquake Monitoring Stations | Blob | General Science | 0 | 14-July-2006 10:11 PM |
| Did they go to the Nevada Desert ? | Sticks | Conspiracy Theories | 65 | 09-September-2005 09:13 AM |
| For those concerned about an earthquake ‘uptick’ | Captain Kidd | Against the Mainstream | 8 | 30-May-2003 03:47 AM |