A California court ordered the termination of two Redwoods in order to eliminate the shade cast upon a neighbor's solar panel.

Besides the fact that living trees (Redwoods!) must be sacrificed for solar energy, it strikes me odd that in this case there may be little to be gained. The electric power needed to cool a house that is not shaded probably can not be generated by the Solar panels. A house becomes much hotter without shade. This may not be true in this case since the picture shows a large portion of the roof is covered by the panels that do provide shade themselves. I would be curious how much more net energy savings is gained by the chainsaw execution, if any.

__________________
Lighten up! This is a stellar board! Author: duh.

"The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the universe to do..." Author: Galileo supposedly.

San Jose Mercury News, with aerial photograph. (I don't know if CNN is reporting old status from then, or after an appeal decision the defendants planned, or if they didn't actually appeal.)

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

Sometimes the simplest solutions elude people???

__________________
UFO's and Aliens are Real. There is so much evidence like the UFO pictures and Alien pictures Here. Howl can you Deny?

I'm not much of a tree-hugger. If the redwoods were just a few years old, I would understand. If they were thousands of years old, it would be a shame, as there's little sane justification for cutting down any old-growth forests.

Why not just move the solar panel??? Electricity does travel over these fantastic inventions known as "copper wires."

And if the solar panels were for the heating of water, there are ways to handle that issue, too.

__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."

These are freakin redwoods. Did the guy with the solar panels think that they would stay short? Leave it to California to cut down redwoods cause some fool didnt take their growth into account.

I am suprised that the logging companies havent started putting up panels so they can cut the trees when they grow.

California has priors:...consists of the one redwood remaining after its nearby mates were felled in the name of progress.

__________________
*

I expect the guy thought his neighbors could and would keep their redwoods trimmed in accordance with state law.

I've got redwood bonsai. They don't inevitably reach 100 meters in height. (Google image search redwood bonsai)

I do wish the law would be changed. But I also don't blame the guy for asking that it be enforced for his benefit.

__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ...

I guess my question is: Did he check with his neighbors as to their intentions before he put the panels in?

Law or no law, it seems quite rude to force the trees to be removed cause he couldnt be bothered to take the trees into account beforhand. Even worse if he knew the law and decided to just screw his neighbors.

According to the article:

I suspect there were problems between the neighbors before this. But, anyway, I'm not sure we should so quickly dismiss access to sunlight on one's own property. With PV becoming more important, should your neighbor be able to block off your sunlight when they feel like it? It seems to me that this could be an important property right.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

__________________
We want our children to go to the planets. Burt Rutan 6/21/04
Tuckers! Science! Automotive Oddities! Boycott Trek XI! Building my hot rod with the help of the intarwebs Those who would delay scientific progress for a little temporary prosperity shall have neither.

Yes, I started thinking about the Simpsons when I read the article. I don't know if the neighbor was a smart version of Monty, but it's possible.

__________________
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

Disclaimer: Avatar is not an official NASA image and does not imply any specific interplanetary or interstellar capability.

The Leif Ericson Cruiser

Interesting point! Spark the debate.

I think that the point that should be addressed is "how old was that redwood"?

I think you'll find that the redwoods in question were just a few years old.

It was more of an exercise in journalistic marketing than it was an exercise in either journalistic integrity or truth.

And a very poor job on the part of the journalist.

__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."

Good question!

Yes, sunlight is an important property right when it has value.

And the debating answer is that trees can be planted anywhere, including places which don't obscure sunlight.

__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."

It's slightly off-topic, but a recent study has shown that current solar panels are far better than they used to be in terms of overall energy payback.

A few decades ago, it cost almost as much energy to build the panels as they produced over their lifetime. Now with improved materials and production techniques, it requires only 2% to 11% of their eventual energy output to make them. In other words, PVs now make very good sense from a carbon-emissions standpoint.

I wonder what the comparison would be between the carbon savings of the PV panels vs. the carbon sequestration of the trees being removed. I'll bet the solar panels win hands down. (Of course, trees have value beyond being mere carbon sinks. I'll bet one big reason they were planted was as a privacy screen. Then there are issues of aesthetics, wildlife habitat, shade, wind break, and suchlike.)

__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)

As a privacy screen the trees probably wouldn't need to grow beyond 15 feet.
Ditto for windbreak.
As for shade, the whole point of the matter was that it was the neighbor who got it, and he didn't want it

__________________
An emperor without enemies, a king without a kingdom, supported in life by the willing tribute of a free people.

I don't know how to double-quote this, so, Donnie B you're up: "It's slightly off-topic, but a recent study has shown that current solar panels are far better than they used to be in terms of overall energy payback.

A few decades ago, it cost almost as much energy to build the panels as they produced over their lifetime. Now with improved materials and production techniques, it requires only 2% to 11% of their eventual energy output to make them. In other words, PVs now make very good sense from a carbon-emissions standpoint.[/quote]

That's an important point to keep in mind here, folks, particularly with the availability of rooftop solar systems.[/quote]

I wonder what the comparison would be between the carbon savings of the PV panels vs. the carbon sequestration of the trees being removed. I'll bet the solar panels win hands down. (Of course, trees have value beyond being mere carbon sinks. I'll bet one big reason they were planted was as a privacy screen. Then there are issues of aesthetics, wildlife habitat, shade, wind break, and suchlike.)"

Yeah, a 15 ft windbreak sort of stinks. Way too short.

By the way, folks - I'm speaking faciously.

Please be kindly.

Still, this continues to raise the question of one's real nature.

I'm off for now (bathroom break).

Ok. Don't have anything more to add.

__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."

Excellent point - well represenented.

I think if every home roof were covered in PV panels we'd probably have solved the "energy crisis" long ago.

We're really not all that smart, are we?de413.6

The last seven characters are evidence of the stack of DVDs falling on me, so not, I guess we're really not that smart!

By the way: Ouch.

__________________
I am Mugs, of the Alien clan of Usa, Nordamerica, a Terran, of Sol.

Mine: "Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often not a very good one at that."

Heinlein's: "Staying young requires the unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods." "Freedom begins when you tell Ms. Grundy to go fly a kite."

I kind of mixed generalities and specifics in that parenthetic remark. The part that starts "Then there are..." was intended to be about trees in general. I was trying to prevent anybody from getting the idea that I thought the only valid measuring stick for trees vs. PVs was the carbon footprint.

Let me rephrase:
(Of course, trees have value beyond being mere carbon sinks. I'll bet one big reason they were planted in this instance was as a privacy screen. But in general there are also issues of aesthetics, wildlife habitat, shade, wind break, and suchlike that come down on the tree side of the ledger.)

__________________
Bring back Firefly!

"It is quite clear that Occam's razor does not sharpen in your pyramid." (Nicolas)

"Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest." (Paul Simon)