Evidence please?

For starters:

What was your datum reference frame from which these measurements were made?

How much allowance was made for deterioration of the materials?

How was the lack of flatness of the stone sides factored in?

How were deviations from flatness of the datum features calculated and factored into the xyz reference frame?

Were later additions to the structure ignored?

Were missing sections added by estimation?

Were geometric errors related to lack of straightness of the sides accounted for?

What was the soak temperature when the materials were being measured?

What was the actual measuring equipment?

Were the equipment's accuracy and precision variables factored into the results?

Again, evidence, please, which addresses each and every of the questions asked above, all of which are pertinent regarding the veracity of your claim.

__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.