Chatroom
 

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

   

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 25-April-2008, 08:13 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,538
Default Guillermo del Toro to direct 'The Hobbit,' sequel

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Guillermo del Toro is directing "The Hobbit" and its sequel, which will span the 60 years between the first book and the beginning of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, New Line Cinema announced Thursday. 9news.com
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 25-April-2008, 10:20 PM
A.DIM's Avatar
A.DIM A.DIM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,520
Default

Cool.
He should do well with it.

The kids and I were recently watching the animated version and they were asking why no "real" movie has been made.

They say the damnedest things.

__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25-April-2008, 11:15 PM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 1,843
Default

Sequel? What happened after The Hobbit was that B. Baggins, Esq., lived in comfort and quiet, and did his best to avoid the Sackville-Bagginses. Makes for a boring movie.

Or are they shooting the one book as two movies?

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 26-April-2008, 08:13 AM
Paul Beardsley's Avatar
Paul Beardsley Paul Beardsley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Havant, England
Posts: 3,005
Default

I think it's about events going on elsewhere in Middle Earth - things hinted at in the appendices to Lord of the Rings.

I'd like to see them do some Silmaril tales.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 26-April-2008, 07:02 PM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

This is great news - a vast improvement on Jackson. My main worry now is that the sequel will avoid the available Tolkien material, using a lot of new material instead.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 27-April-2008, 12:50 PM
Nowhere Man's Avatar
Nowhere Man Nowhere Man is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southfield MI
Posts: 1,843
Default

User Friendly has the answer.

Fred
__________________
"For shame, gentlemen, pack your evidence a little better against another time."
-- John Dryden, "The Vindication of The Duke of Guise" 1684
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 27-April-2008, 01:13 PM
Kaptain K's Avatar
Kaptain K Kaptain K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elgin, Tx
Posts: 7,588
Default

Ouch!
__________________
Any day you wake up on "the right side of the dirt" is a good day.

T. Anderson
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 28-April-2008, 02:33 PM
Mister Earl's Avatar
Mister Earl Mister Earl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,067
Default

Ah, the Simerillion. That's the hardest reading book I own, and I've read it several times
#EDIT: Anyone have the luxury of owning a hardback copy of Frodo Lives! ?
__________________
Currently conducting pre-deployment training, shortly followed by mobilization to Iraq. Note that PMs may take a long time to be responded to.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 28-April-2008, 03:07 PM
DyerWolf DyerWolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dark Side of the Sun
Posts: 1,019
Default

Excellent!

If anyone can incorporate the darkness necessary to give the Hobbit its proper gravitas, it is Guillermo del Toro.

I just hope they keep side characters, like Beorn who help develop the story and give the world its depth. (C.f. Tom Bombadil, and Old Man Willow, who were left out of Jackson's rendition...)

I also hope they stick to Jackson's length - i.e. making the movies long enough to do the story justice, rather than trying to stick to typical length movies.

Looking forward to it!
__________________
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
- Goethe

Jump in with both feet!
- Me, indulging my inner eight-year-old


*** *** ***

"Are you a mad-hatter that just types what he wishes, or have you actually any physics training?"
Occam's Ghost to Grant Hutchison.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2008, 08:15 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,538
Question

Del Toro: "I was never into heroic fantasy. At all. I don't like little guys and dragons, hairy feet, hobbits -- I've never been into that at all. I don't like sword and sorcery, I hate all that stuff."
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2008, 09:18 PM
A.DIM's Avatar
A.DIM A.DIM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Earl View Post
Ah, the Simerillion. That's the hardest reading book I own, and I've read it several times
#EDIT: Anyone have the luxury of owning a hardback copy of Frodo Lives! ?
Nope, but I've got a hardback copy of The Silmarillion with foldout maps and all...

And I'd have to agree about the difficulty in reading it... damned near worse than the Bible!
__________________
"Where the telescope ends, the microscope begins. Which of the two has the greater view?" - Hugo

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2008, 09:35 PM
Paul Beardsley's Avatar
Paul Beardsley Paul Beardsley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Havant, England
Posts: 3,005
Default

The Silmarillion is a gorgeous book. More immersible than Lord of the Rings, IMO. The Children of Hurin is high on my reading list.

But the more I think about it, the more I believe Jackson got it right. Any truer to the source material, we'd have had the entire Tolkien Society in ecstacy, but everybody else (including casual fans of the books) glancing at their watches and muttering, "Did they really have to include the bath song?"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-May-2008, 10:43 PM
Lianachan's Avatar
Lianachan Lianachan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: A' Ghàidhealtachd
Posts: 1,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
Any truer to the source material, we'd have had the entire Tolkien Society in ecstacy, but everybody else (including casual fans of the books) glancing at their watches and muttering, "Did they really have to include the bath song?"
There's a middle ground between those two extremes. A lot of things - like, indeed, the bath song - are entirely irrelevant and could be dropped without any impact whatsoever. My main problem with the films isn't so much what was missed out, which Tolkien himself said was an inevitable part of any film adaptation, it was the changes to the characters. Which Tolkien himself said was a complete no no.
__________________
I offer a complete and utter retraction. The imputation was totally without basis in fact, was in no way fair comment and was motivated purely by malice. I deeply regret any distress that my comments may have caused you or your family, and I hereby undertake not to repeat any such slander at any time in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 10:05 AM
Paul Beardsley's Avatar
Paul Beardsley Paul Beardsley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Havant, England
Posts: 3,005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lianachan View Post
There's a middle ground between those two extremes.
I honestly think Jackson found that middle ground, although I certainly do not think the films are flawless. IMO he produced a film that hit the spot with two vital groups: the popcorn-munchers* and the books' casual fans. The only two groups who appear to be dissatisfied are the Tolkien purists (a very small demographic whom Jackson knew would go to see it anyway) and people who simply don't like that sort of thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lianachan
My main problem with the films isn't so much what was missed out, which Tolkien himself said was an inevitable part of any film adaptation, it was the changes to the characters. Which Tolkien himself said was a complete no no.
It's worth keeping in mind that Tolkien was not a film maker.

It is perfectly possible that Two Towers would have been as good as, if not better, than the film we actually got if, say, Faramir had said, "Don't worry Frodo, unlike my brother I shall not covet the ring." But it might have been disastrous. I don't think Jackson took decisions like this lightly.

My feeling at the moment is that I would love to see a Hobbit that follows the book exactly, including the dwarves' crockery song, the oft-ignored giants playing football on the mountain, and Bombur going on about his dream of a feast while the others are starving.


*People who watch films for the sole purpose of being entertained.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Sequel Factor Ripper Small Media at Large 227 09-April-2004 02:55 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
©  2006 Bad Astronomy and Universe Today