If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum > General > Off-Topic Babbling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 06:53 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 4,837
Default Back to the Future

I'm watching Back to the Future III, this evening, and the critical hurdle was that they couldn't figure out a way to get a Delorean up to 88 mph. They tried alcohol, but it blew the manifold off the engine, rendering it useless.

I won't give away their solution (spoiler), but would like to open this thread for Back to the Future aficionados so we can discuss alternative methods of propelling a DeLorean to 88 mph in ways available in 1885.

(by the way, aficionado is the correct spelling, as it's a modern Spanish word, as is patio, even though most English-speaking people spell it afficionado).

First, we must remember that the DeLorean that went to 1885 was the one with the Mr. Fusion, could fly, etc. However, the lightening strike that sent it there fried the time circuits and the car's flying ability.

There was one hilarious and highly improbably scene in the movie where they were pulling it behind a 6-horse team, but since horses top out around 40 mph, less than half that required for DeLorean time travel, it was improbable that they would have ever tried that in the first place... ( and they only reported 35 mph in the movie...)

I thought of a method involving ropes, a very heavy weight and a cliff (particularly, a mesa, plentiful in the old West - and the new!)

Attach one end of the rope to a fixed location. Attach the other to a heavy weight next to the edge of the mesa, with a line draw between the fixed point and the edge perpendicular to the edge of the mesa. The DeLorean is drawn back such that perhaps it's three times distant from that perpendicular line than between the fixed point and the heavy weight, and with equal amounts of rope between it and both the fixed point and the weight. In addition, there's a (for lack of a better term) sort of capstan around which the length of rope between the DeLorean and the weight is fed such that the pulling point remains on a line between the pulling point and the fixed point that's perpendicular to the velocity vector of the DeLorean

It is such that the DeLorean's velocity vector is parallel to the edge of the mesa (not over it, as some might have thought - remember, the fusion and the flying circuits have been fried).

Then, simply drop the weight off the cliff. It is pulled by gravity, building velocity. As the rope between the pulling point shortens due to the falling weight, it drags the DeLorean along, at first with a large authority of the weight (potential energy), then, as the rope bend angle nears zero, transferring the falling weight's kinetic energy into even more tug.

I feel quite certain that if this system is properly designed, with enough rope to handle the strain, a suitable location, properly calculated weight, etc., it would have no trouble whatsoever of accelerating the DeLorean to 88 mph (or much further).

That's my solution.

I'd like to hear your solutions!
__________________
WIKIPEDIA and GOOGLE are your friends! But only if you use them.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often, not a very good one at that.

Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you think the two are equivalent, you've never heard of Von Claustwicz, Sun Tsu, or street magicians.

Formal Logical Fallacy List

Last edited by mugaliens : 09-May-2008 at 10:22 PM. Reason: corrections of fact, specifically with the speed of horses
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:00 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 6,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
...I won't give away their solution (spoiler)...
Yep..the plot is still a secret.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
... but would like to open this thread for Back to the Future aficionados so we can discuss alternative methods of propelling a DeLorean to 88 mph in ways available in 1885.
I always wondered why he couldn't just fashion a motor to run on Mr Fusion, but, considering they had less than a week, the first thing that came to thier minds that would be feasible would be enough.

Shouldn't this be in media?
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:13 PM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,127
Default

I wonder if it was the tires moving at 88mph or the machine moving relative to the ground?

If it were just the tires, gears and a team of horses could have put it on a treadmill and gotten it up to the required speed.


I think refining alcohol to work in the Delorean would have been easier than all of that.
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:24 PM
Extravoice's Avatar
Extravoice Extravoice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 574
Default

I didn't see the movie (I liked the original, though).

I don't see why they couldn't get the desired effect using a sufficient length of rope and a number of pulleys in a block and tackle arrangement.

Horses pull on the part that moves a small amount, while the car moves a large amount. You may need a large number of horses, but they were plentiful in those days, right?
__________________
"All natural, huh? So is lightning." - Mike Rowe
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:27 PM
mike alexander's Avatar
mike alexander mike alexander is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: People's Republic of Oregon
Posts: 5,022
Default

Put it on a railroad flatcar. Trains could reach 88mph by 1885.
__________________
The Devil offered me power. I told him I preferred aperture.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 07:32 PM
tdvance's Avatar
tdvance tdvance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bowie, MD
Posts: 1,054
Default

I happened to think of the problem a few days ago (and I can't remember how it came to mind)--and if I remember right, the only thing wrong with the car they were using was indians shot an arrow in the gas tank and it had no gas. There just HAS to be a way to make Mr. Fusion do that job! 1.41 gigawatts or whatever it was ought to be able to accelerate a car to 88mph somehow.
__________________
-----
Todd (Bowie, MD, US, North America, Earth, Sol System, Vega region, Local Bubble, Orion arm, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group, Virgo A Cluster, Virgo supercluster, the universe in which spock is clean shaven)

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

personal page: http://blog.astrosketches.info
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:09 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 4,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry View Post
I think refining alcohol to work in the Delorean would have been easier than all of that.
Well, in early trials they blew the intake manifold, rendering the engine useless.

How Doc, given his PhD would forget to refine the 80-proof into near 100-proof is beyond me, as all gas engines today can run on 200-proof for a short time (certainly enough to get it to 88 mph).

But, he didn't, and fed it 80-proof, which, in the story, blew the intake manifold.
__________________
WIKIPEDIA and GOOGLE are your friends! But only if you use them.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often, not a very good one at that.

Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you think the two are equivalent, you've never heard of Von Claustwicz, Sun Tsu, or street magicians.

Formal Logical Fallacy List

Last edited by mugaliens : 11-May-2008 at 12:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:18 PM
Redrum's Avatar
Redrum Redrum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rochester uk,Kent
Posts: 137
Default

The future, well....all that I can say is that it shall be no different from the grotty old past....and the strange and messed up present. Oh, and the the first one was good, the last one was ok....and the second is...well I have never seen that one...is it good, bad or ugly? Or is it like an axe in the back.
__________________
Bonus Agricola .
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:19 PM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdvance View Post
I happened to think of the problem a few days ago (and I can't remember how it came to mind)--and if I remember right, the only thing wrong with the car they were using was indians shot an arrow in the gas tank and it had no gas. There just HAS to be a way to make Mr. Fusion do that job! 1.41 gigawatts or whatever it was ought to be able to accelerate a car to 88mph somehow.


maybe if they had an electric motor at the local hardware store
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:20 PM
crosscountry's Avatar
crosscountry crosscountry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texan in Texas
Posts: 4,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
Well, in early trials they blew the intake manifold, rendering the engine useless.

How Doc, given his PhD would forget to refine the 80-proof into near 100-proof is beyond me, as all gas engines today can run on 100-proof for a short time (certainly enough to get it to 88 mph).

But, he didn't, and fed it 80-proof, which, in the story, blew the intake manifold.

I'm not sure my truck can go 88mph

2001 chevy s10 4-cyl.
__________________
"I will do my best to understand and explain the universe from big to small without invoking miracles, unrepeatable events, or divine intervention. In place of those things I will use observations, mathematics, and science."


-Cross
My travel blog

Some of my Astrophotography


Those that lack education have a hard time understanding its value. - Cross
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:20 PM
KaiYeves's Avatar
KaiYeves KaiYeves is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Currently on assignment on planet shown in avatar photo
Posts: 6,549
Default

Could you use vegtable oil?
__________________
Kai's home computer is broken and her posting may be eratic for a while
Quote:
Rovers forever!
- ToSeek
"The only way to explore the universe is to go and look." - Brian Cox
Well, the best way to find out is to go there and, find out. - Raven's Cry
'Evolution and science are one thing, but you don’t mess with Yoko Ono. Everybody knows that. ' - 386sx
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 08:24 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 4,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
The future, well....all that I can say is that it shall be no different from the grotty old past....and the strange and messed up present. Oh, and the the first one was good, the last one was ok....and the second is...well I have never seen that one...is it good, bad or ugly? Or is it like an axe in the back.
Actually the third is my favorite, the second is my least favorite, and the third is a close second to my favorite.

But to understand the third, you should watch the second, and in order to watch the second you must first understand the first, which forms the foundation behind the entire series.

dislaimer: i am not a promoter, distributor, or in any way financially connected with anyone who either acted in, directed, wrote the screenplay, produced, was any sort of grip, gate guard, or LA police or wherever these movies were created.

I simply like them for their own right. They're good, they're fun! Highly entertaining.

Back to the movie (it's not yet over...)
__________________
WIKIPEDIA and GOOGLE are your friends! But only if you use them.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often, not a very good one at that.

Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you think the two are equivalent, you've never heard of Von Claustwicz, Sun Tsu, or street magicians.

Formal Logical Fallacy List
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 10:24 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 4,837
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry View Post
maybe if they had an electric motor at the local hardware store
In 1885, Crosscountry?

Resynch your jets, as your misfiring on a few...
__________________
WIKIPEDIA and GOOGLE are your friends! But only if you use them.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often, not a very good one at that.

Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you think the two are equivalent, you've never heard of Von Claustwicz, Sun Tsu, or street magicians.

Formal Logical Fallacy List
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 10:26 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dortmund
Posts: 4,837
Default

And where is Trebuchet when you need him...
__________________
WIKIPEDIA and GOOGLE are your friends! But only if you use them.

Perception isn't reality. It's merely an abstraction thereof, and quite often, not a very good one at that.

Perception is what happens between the senses and consciousness. Reality is what happened before that. If you think the two are equivalent, you've never heard of Von Claustwicz, Sun Tsu, or street magicians.

Formal Logical Fallacy List
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 10:43 PM
LunarOrbit's Avatar
LunarOrbit LunarOrbit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 302
Default

I'm surprised Doc Brown couldn't put together a simple rocket motor. The Chinese were making rockets way back in the 13th century, and with the Doc's modern knowledge he should have been able to slap together a basic rocket motor using gunpowder or alcohol and attach it to the DeLorean.
__________________
" We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard..." - John F. Kennedy
TheSpaceRace.com
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 10:47 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 15,483
Default Re: Back to the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
Could you use vegtable oil?
If the engine were a diesel, then perhaps.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-May-2008, 10:48 PM
Maksutov's Avatar
Maksutov Maksutov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fifth corner of the Earth
Posts: 15,483
Default Re: Back to the Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
The future, well....all that I can say is that it shall be no different from the grotty old past....and the strange and messed up present. Oh, and the the first one was good, the last one was ok....and the second is...well I have never seen that one...is it good, bad or ugly? Or is it like an axe in the back.
Now there's a word I haven't seen nor heard in a long time: grotty.
__________________
A person's name, or a mark representing it, as signed personally or by deputy, as in subscribing a letter or other document.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 01:01 PM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
The future, well....all that I can say is that it shall be no different from the grotty old past....and the strange and messed up present. Oh, and the the first one was good, the last one was ok....and the second is...well I have never seen that one...is it good, bad or ugly? Or is it like an axe in the back.
Back to the Future > Back to the Future II > Back to the Future III.

It sort of goes downhill, but with a veeery gentle slope. The second movie is still very watchable, and indeed the third as well.

Mugaliens, wouldn't the rope probably snap?
__________________
"All your bias are belong to us." Ara Pacis
"A witty saying proves nothing." Voltaire
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-May-2008, 02:38 PM